2016 FORMULA 1 RUSSIAN GRAND PRIX: RACE *** SPOILERS *** | Page 18 | FerrariChat

2016 FORMULA 1 RUSSIAN GRAND PRIX: RACE *** SPOILERS ***

Discussion in 'F1' started by SPEEDCORE, Apr 30, 2016.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Aircon

    Aircon Ten Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Jun 23, 2003
    100,524
    Melbourne, Australia
    Full Name:
    Peter
    #426 Aircon, May 3, 2016
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  2. janesill

    janesill Rookie

    May 4, 2016
    1
    makati
    Full Name:
    jane sillapakalgun
    Rosberg is definitely on a roll these past few months with 4 wins on a row. I can almost smell his teammate Hamilton's frustrations. Must have been under extreme pressure to catch up..
     
  3. toil

    toil F1 Rookie
    BANNED

    Apr 23, 2014
    3,534
  4. Aircon

    Aircon Ten Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Jun 23, 2003
    100,524
    Melbourne, Australia
    Full Name:
    Peter
  5. DF1

    DF1 Three Time F1 World Champ

    Sensor fail....the tech you know...so complex and mind boggling...
     
  6. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Mar 24, 2008
    42,717
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas
    If the car had no water pressure it would seize the engine within a lap.
     
  7. Aircon

    Aircon Ten Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Jun 23, 2003
    100,524
    Melbourne, Australia
    Full Name:
    Peter
    would it? No idea.....but zero pressure would HAVE to be a pretty significant issue
     
  8. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Mar 24, 2008
    42,717
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas
    Incidentally I've got the 2006 Turkish GP on and Rosberg got a radio ''box the car, slow down immediately. We have no water pressure''.

    Car was done for by the end of the lap cruising back to pit.
     
  9. NEP

    NEP F1 Rookie

    Jul 19, 2010
    4,059
    On Earth
    Full Name:
    Nigel


    Counting last year, now seven consecutive victories in a row.

    The 4th Driver to achieve this in F1 history, the others being:-

    Sebastian Vettel - 9 wins
    Alberto Ascari - 7 wins
    Michael Schumacher - 7 wins
     
  10. furoni

    furoni F1 World Champ

    Jun 6, 2011
    13,986
    Vila Verde
    Full Name:
    Pedro Braga Soares
    Who cares.....both cars should burn (withouit the drivers...hummm,hammy could get his hair roasted) to the ground next race!!!
     
  11. ypsilon

    ypsilon F1 Rookie

    May 4, 2008
    2,628
    the Netherlands
    #437 ypsilon, May 4, 2016
    Last edited: May 4, 2016
    From my understanding, a former f1 driver mentioned it after the Sochi race, an f1 cars water is always under pressure.

    Unlike a regular car which is not under pressure when it's cold that. Hence you can take the radiator cap off when it's cold.

    An f1 engine is logically speaking, even more pressurized considering it's tremendous heat buildup. Plus they can't even start an f1 engine when it's cold. It needs pre-warming.

    No pressure can only mean a leak, or when they consider a certain baseline as "zero or no pressure". It's a closed system.

    16 laps in an f1 car, after it already did 36 laps, "without" pressure meaning no or limited flow, sounds ridiculous. Then you would expect it to heat up very quickly, but that just would cause more pressure.

    But maybe someone with a mechanical background can give some insight.
     
  12. ypsilon

    ypsilon F1 Rookie

    May 4, 2008
    2,628
    the Netherlands
    My thoughts as well.

    Everything in an f1 engine is engineered to max performance, but a Mercedes f1 engine can function 16 laps without any water pressure ? and even without dropping back, with similar laptimes as Kimi's Ferrari ?

    Doesn't sound logical.
     
  13. ricksb

    ricksb F1 Veteran

    Apr 12, 2005
    9,975
    Montclair Village
    Full Name:
    B. Ricks
    Kimi closed from 26 secs behind to only 7 by the end of the race. Hamilton dropped off big time. He went from 7 secs behind Rosberg to, I think, 40 secs?
     
  14. tifosi_

    tifosi_ Formula 3

    Sep 24, 2013
    1,863
    Toronto
    Full Name:
    Clyde
    Ferrari has just had bad luck so far this year. They have had the potential but failures and bad calls from the pit crew and pit stop delays (Australia), and subsequent failures and accidents beyond their control have scuppered their chances. Just imagine if Hamilton's engine really ran without water pressure for 18 laps and it failed like it normally should have, then at the very least Kimi would have had a well deserved 2nd and Bottas a well deserved 3rd. A lot of winning and scoring comes down to luck (or not having it). Hamilton complained about his car on the podium but he is super lucky to have got there.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  15. ypsilon

    ypsilon F1 Rookie

    May 4, 2008
    2,628
    the Netherlands
    Just checked, from 7 sec. to 25 seconds behind Rosberg.

    Still it sounds very strange.
     
  16. NEP

    NEP F1 Rookie

    Jul 19, 2010
    4,059
    On Earth
    Full Name:
    Nigel



    As NJB13 said in post #315, perhaps a coded message to ease up on the throttle and save fuel.
     
  17. ypsilon

    ypsilon F1 Rookie

    May 4, 2008
    2,628
    the Netherlands
    With my limited mechanical understanding, the above can be the only logical explanation, if it really happened like Merc. says it did.



    Good call. Probably it.
     
  18. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    The 'no water pressure' story from Bernie's site;

    https://www.formula1.com/content/fom-website/en/latest/headlines/2016/5/f1-mercedes-no-idea-how-hamilton-finished-russia.html

    The above is an edited version of the full story on their own site;

    MERCEDES AMG PETRONAS - A Letter to the Fans

    For some reason I can't C&P from there, but it's a pretty interesting read on what happened to both of them (Nico's MGU-K and LH's lack of water pressure.)

    I tend agree with others, zero water pressure seems like a long shot. If it was a sensor failure why didnt they just say so?

    Also interesting that they asked Charlie for permission to contact them about their problems. Vague bells are ringing that Charlie's boys can access the same telemetry data as the guys on the wall. I'm not a 100% sure, but that he granted permission suggests it may not be complete BS.

    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  19. IamRobG

    IamRobG F1 Rookie

    Jun 18, 2007
    4,092
    NY
    Fastest lap on safe mode huh. Yeah nobody else stands a chance.
     
  20. P.Singhof

    P.Singhof F1 Rookie

    Apr 19, 2006
    4,819
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Full Name:
    Peter Singhof
    ...or simply to back up.

    He was second and under no circumstances it would have been possible to get in front of Rosberg unless Nico made a huge mistake...Rosberg was able to manage the gap and safe tyres and fuel and with his fastest lap at the end he clearly showed that he could have gone quicker if needed at any time.

    As there was no danger from behind Hamilton had nothing to win by stressing his engine. So instead of chasing 7 points with barely hope of success he safed 18 points on an engine that was already suspicious.

    Hamilton had some bad luck in the last races but not "really bad luck". None of the races was a DNF and he always could collect points. Just one or two DNF of Rosberg and he is back in business. So there was no reason to chase these few points at this point of the championship risking an engine that might be needed at the end of the season, drivers like Prost most likely would have known that but Hamilton obviously must be told so by the team...Some might say that it is good that he always tries to win but under some circumstances it is just more clever to play safe and look at the bigger picture....
     
  21. toil

    toil F1 Rookie
    BANNED

    Apr 23, 2014
    3,534
    Rosbergs car was fixed near the end because they changed into another mode. I don't think "safe mode" was meant to infer a mode of any less power output
     
  22. NeuroBeaker

    NeuroBeaker Advising Moderator
    Moderator

    Oct 1, 2008
    40,012
    Huntsville, AL., USA
    Full Name:
    Andrew
    Of course a safe mode has less power. Otherwise it would just be "normal" mode. Do you think at other times in the race they operate a more arduous mode for the engine that delivers no additional power output over the safe mode?

    All the best,
    Andrew.
     
  23. Aircon

    Aircon Ten Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Jun 23, 2003
    100,524
    Melbourne, Australia
    Full Name:
    Peter
    Lol
     
  24. nsxrebel

    nsxrebel Formula 3

    Jan 8, 2004
    1,906
    :D lol
     

Share This Page