car design thread | Page 176 | FerrariChat

car design thread

Discussion in 'Creative Arts' started by jm2, Oct 19, 2012.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. jm2

    jm2 F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    19,204
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
    Exactly.
    Don't get me started on the 'the requirements drove us to make it look that way'.
    Really?
    Some people like to hide behind the need to meet the multitude of Fed Requirements/Aero requirements for mediocre design, but as usual, some are better at solving those requirements than others.
     
  2. jm2

    jm2 F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    19,204
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
  3. kerrari

    kerrari Two Time F1 World Champ

    Oct 22, 2004
    24,033
    Coolum Beach AUSTRALIA
    Full Name:
    Karen H.
    John is exactly right - design is about solving problems, whether the 'problems' are the brief, regulations, or the client... Good design provides a good solution to all these.
    Maybe addressing the unaffordability of the light pods might be an extra 'problem' that needs to get added to the list?
     
  4. Peter Tabmow

    Peter Tabmow Formula Junior

    Nov 10, 2010
    666
    #4379 Peter Tabmow, Nov 13, 2016
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2016
    John, your thoughts have helped sharpen my own – as I hoped they would. So a couple of further comments from me:

    (1) I think what I should have said is that photographs of contemporary cars often seem less attractive to me than shots from a generation ago, but many modern cars that appear unimpressive in photos I find much more striking and appealing in the flesh. Have you ever had the same perception, and if so, why would this be the case?

    (2) Maybe what I find pleasing about the treatment of lights and trim on classic cars is that it always offers a composition of basic formal elements. If done well, this can be more interesting and appealing than a single lighting pod which includes all the lamps and signals, or a bumper which is entirely subsumed by the overall form of the car. Of course, this observation could be overly influenced by my graphic design and art background...

    As for the use of full-size clay models (I'd seen that BBC piece before) I can tell you this: I can still tell a typeface that was drawn by hand before being digitised from one that was created entirely on a computer. With the former technique, the designer tends to settle on complex, irregular curves that please the eye. With the latter, the designer tends to opt for more regular curves as a convenient short-cut. So the persistence of clay modelling doesn't surprise me in the least.
     
  5. jm2

    jm2 F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    19,204
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
    #4380 jm2, Nov 14, 2016
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017


    Peter,

    1. I believe it has much to do with how the photographer viewed the car, and the angles, lighting, focal length, composition, etc., etc. Sometimes there is as much art in the photographic phase, as is contained in the design stage.I don't believe Ferrari, one of our favorite topics, utilizes photography to it's most complimentary, flattering, depiction of the vehicles. I'm not certain as to why you find earlier generation car photography more compelling. Just like design, the photography can make or break a car's appearance. If done with the right 'eye', photographs can be awesome. Interestingly, Pontiac during the '60's utilized the talent of Art Fitzpatrick and Van Kaufman,Fitz and Van, to depict the product. These renderings were a huge influence on my generation of designers. The Pontiac Div. decided in the early '70's to use photography instead of artwork, and IMO, it was never the same. The AF/VK renderings had just enough 'cheat' in them to tell a story and make the cars look better than the real thing.

    2. While I appreciate your observations, my personal preferences have been an attempt to better integrate the elements that make up a front or rear design. The traditional round or rectangular always looked like an afterthought to me. Some brands did a better job integrating than others, but the Europeans led the way in providing lamps that were integral to the design rather than looking like an 'off the shelf' part.


    As an aside, I had a typography professor at Art Center that had us doing old school letter design. We had to render by hand a letter, and also had to hand letter the phrase 'Gracious Dignity'. At the time I just couldn't understand how I would ever need that discipline, when it came to designing a vehicle. Was I ever mistaken! That discipline taught me to appreciate the subtleties of 1/2 MM variances and line control that were part of our job later in our careers. If I only knew at the time, I probably would have put greater effort into that lesson. I learned the hard way later in my career :eek:
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
    ModernLou likes this.
  6. Peter Tabmow

    Peter Tabmow Formula Junior

    Nov 10, 2010
    666
    I had to do similar exercises many times, only under the iron eye of a Swiss instructor from Basel. In addition to the skills you cite, these studies also gave me an extremely useful empirical grasp of what appeals (and doesn't appeal) to the human eye, along with an appreciation of how a line 'over here' affects a line 'over there' on an overall form.

    And thanks for the Fitz and Van drawings – I remember them well! I always thought the lifestyle associations created by the backgrounds obviated the need for any copy other than a logo and model name...
     
  7. Tenney

    Tenney F1 Rookie
    Consultant

    Feb 21, 2001
    4,291
    Art did the cars and Van did the backgrounds?
     
  8. jm2

    jm2 F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    19,204
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
    Yes, that's how they worked.
    When i asked Mr. Fitzpatrick if they physically worked together, he said they worked far apart, Van was on the East coast, and Art was either here in the MidWest or somewhere else. Looking back, it's hard to believe, looking at their work. :eek:

    That Pontiac artwork had a great impact on a whole generation of designers. We used to study those highlights & reflections very carefully.
     
  9. jm2

    jm2 F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    19,204
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
    That's one of the things I try to impart on my students.
    Words aren't necessary, if the visuals tell a story.
    And how those Pontiac ads told stories, with little or no words.
     
  10. 330 4HL

    330 4HL Formula 3

    May 12, 2005
    1,637
    Vancouver
    Full Name:
    Rick Bradner
    I really love the old style in those Pontiac ads; the Firebird looks particularly fetching.
    (I notice they don't seem to have suffered much from having round lights) ;)

    Do you know of any manufacturer that has tried to use this art form in their ad campaigns in recent history? It seems to me that it might provide a nice bit of differentiation; a touch of old world luxury -
     
  11. jm2

    jm2 F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    19,204
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
    I KNEW someone would mention the round lamps ;)

    sadly, no mfg i'm aware of uses artwork anymore, it's all about photography
    the '60's were a unique period in time regarding so many things, auto advertising being one of them
     
  12. Peter Tabmow

    Peter Tabmow Formula Junior

    Nov 10, 2010
    666

    I remember as a kid looking forward each month to the next issue of Car and Driver and thhe latest (editorial) illustrations by Ken Dallison.
     
  13. jm2

    jm2 F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    19,204
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
    Ken is one of my favorite artists
    Have a large collection of his work.
    His art also tells a story
     
  14. 330 4HL

    330 4HL Formula 3

    May 12, 2005
    1,637
    Vancouver
    Full Name:
    Rick Bradner
    Interesting turn to the thread!
    A friend of mine in the UK was mates with Ken when the both worked for Ford doing the equivalent of the Pontiac ad in Brittan. It seems they met while working at the same graphic design studio in London. They both had a great interest in American cars and the US embassy in Grosvenor Square was just down the road from the studio. They hooked up together when Ken returned from his time at C&D for the Ford gig.
    He does some pretty remarkable work as well, and I have quite a few.
    You can check out his website (Peter Hutton) which is a bit clumsy to navigate or just search for his name and check for images.
    I quite like his style -
     
  15. jm2

    jm2 F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    19,204
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
    #4390 jm2, Nov 15, 2016
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Peter's work is equally awesome.
    My collection has Dallison, David Brown & Barron Story as well.
    Those guys had similar styles, with the washes & pen & ink.
    Love that stuff!!!
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  16. jm2

    jm2 F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    19,204
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
  17. jm2

    jm2 F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    19,204
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
    #4392 jm2, Nov 15, 2016
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  18. jm2

    jm2 F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    19,204
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
    #4393 jm2, Nov 15, 2016
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  19. jm2

    jm2 F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    19,204
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
  20. 330 4HL

    330 4HL Formula 3

    May 12, 2005
    1,637
    Vancouver
    Full Name:
    Rick Bradner
    #4395 330 4HL, Nov 15, 2016
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    I've always loved the translucent feeling of Dennis' paintings. Great stuff -

    Here's a photo I took two years ago of Peter at home with one of his pieces; well two if you count his shirt...
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  21. Jeff Kennedy

    Jeff Kennedy F1 Veteran
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Oct 16, 2007
    6,848
    Edwardsville, IL
    Full Name:
    Jeff Kennedy
    Maybe the Aztek wasn't so bad after all. The entire group that signed off on this needs to be sent to Antarctica to walk around in circles until their brain clears. Hopefully to find somewhere besides cars to work in upon their return.
     
  22. jm2

    jm2 F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    19,204
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
    what a great talent!!
     
  23. jm2

    jm2 F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    19,204
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
    I keep staring at the Toyota and asking myself, what exactly were they thinking?
    Yet, someone at Toyota who makes a lot more $$ than I make must have thought this looked acceptable.
    Just goes to show, it is not a science.
     
  24. jm2

    jm2 F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    19,204
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
    #4399 jm2, Nov 15, 2016
    Last edited: Nov 15, 2016
    what will the car of the future look like?
    interesting answers:
    What will the car of the future look like? | Autocar
    What will the car of the future look like?
    Technological breakthroughs such as autonomy are giving free rein on car design, so we've asked leading designers what the car of the future might look like




    by Jim Holder
    13 November 2016

    Autonomy, digitalisation, electrification and connected cars are no longer fashionable buzzwords looking to a brighter future.

    Today, aspects of all three are already present on our roads, from cruise control functions that read the road ahead and adjust your speed, through to the self-driving Tesla Autopilot and Mercedes Driver Assist functions that are already on stream.

    These are technological breakthroughs with far-reaching consequences; they are the result of the march of time and advances in understanding, and they are statesponsored because of the promise of fewer road injuries and accidents. They are an inevitability that will, in the words of Mercedes CEO Dieter Zetsche, prompt a profound change to cars “as radical as the industry has seen in its 120 years of existence”.

    At the heart of this pivotal moment in time stands a generation of car designers with an entirely new rule book at their fingertips. But what does that rule book look like and how radically different is it?

    Autocar polled leading designers from around the automotive industry to hear their views.

    MICHAEL MAUER, Volkswagen Group head of design, on whether cars will end up looking the same:



    “The mobility world of tomorrow gives us designers entirely new creative possibilities. Electric drives and autonomous driving remove any obstacles and change design more radically than has been the case in recent decades.

    “But that does not mean we will have uniform autonomous vehicles. The streetscape of the future will become even more varied, even more colourful, even more emotional.”

    SATORU TAI, executive design director for Nissan, on changing priorities and the short and longterm challenges:



    “Cars may go through a phase of looking similar, but in the long run I think further advancement of technologies will then enable us to have more freedom in shaping unique designs, just as they did in the past.

    “With the complete change of powertrains, the layout will become more flexible. We will no longer need an extended bonnet or bootlid. If we only pursue efficiency, I think the overall design of cars will become boxier and mono-volume orientated.

    “Since many of the upcoming technologies are about man/machine interfaces, there will be a transition period and I am sure interior design will have more significance than exterior design. To a degree, the interior will influence the exterior design all the more and they will, eventually, resume the relationship they have today.”

    GORDEN WAGENER, head of design at Mercedes-Benz, on bringing simplicity to complex solutions:



    “Look at how much design has changed this company in the past three years. We’ve made the transition from an old luxury company to a modern luxury company, simply through design. Looking to the future with the challenges to come — digitisation, electrification — I think designers are the people to envision it.

    “We’re living in the future; we’re five, 10, even 15 years into the future. Design has never been more important. There’s so much happening and, as designers, we’re really in the driver’s seat here. The new world will become very complex and it’s the designers who will try to make it simple.”

    KLAUS BISCHOFF, Volkswagen design chief, on a focus on interiors:



    “The biggest shift for design will be the interiors of EVs. Because we have pushed the ID concept’s climate control system into the nose, the dash can be pushed back 20cm — which gives a great deal more room in the cabin. Today’s car interiors are close to the driver, almost hemming them in; in future EVS, space in the cabin will be far greater.”

    LAURENS VAN DEN ACKER, design chief for Renault, on whether to go radical or remain conventional:



    “The first thing to say is that there’s never been a better time to be a designer. Technology means engineers can do things they couldn’t five years ago and that has opened up all sorts of avenues. Marketeers have realised that in a world of no really bad cars, design is what makes the difference.

    “We can write our own future — and I don’t see car sharing taking that away. People will still care what their car looks like. People won’t want to be in a vehicle that looks like a trash can, and besides, most people won’t want to share a car. It’s something personal; it would be like sharing your cat.

    “The biggest opportunity in the near future will be space; an electric drivetrain is 40% more compact than a combustion one, so that’s an opportunity. But how far do we go? I’m in favour of change but think customers will still want to see classic proportions. I don’t see a reason for revolution.”

    SIMON HUMPHRIES, president of ED2, Toyota’s design HQ in Europe and one of the key development centres for Lexus and Toyota, on why there’s no single answer:



    “Consumers’ values will become increasingly diverse, and consumers will become increasingly confident in their ability to choose without following mainstream trends. Acceptance of new, radical design and non-traditional hierarchies will result, and that may signal the end of mass trends in design as people seek new methods of self-expression.

    “Size will no longer define the automotive hierarchy and branding strategies will have to change. The paradigm shift from gasoline to electric will not happen overnight; they will co-exist, resulting in each finding its own speciality. Choice will depend on lifestyle and the ‘allrounder’ car of today will be replaced by more specific designs, with the different experiences being offered becoming the brand differentiator.

    “There will also be new influences from developing regions, leading to new concepts and ideas based on criteria other than the traditional European view of the car.”

    MORAY CALLUM, vice-president of design at Ford, on how the designer’s job is changing:



    “There’s more design to do because it’s more complicated. So much more goes into everything. When I started we chose between a 5.0in round headlight or a 7.0in headlight. Now we’ve got around 35 people on headlights, because there are around 50 different parts.

    “We’re not just going to the car design schools to recruit now, because our role is getting wider as our relationship with the car is changing. As designers, we have an expanding role around how these systems we add work. For instance, the designer’s job is to make the [infotainment] logic logical to customers; we’ve got more interior designers than exterior designers now. You fall in love with the exterior but live with the interior — and most of the pain points are inside.”

    ALFONSO ALBAISA, corporate vice-president and executive design director for Infiniti, on changing limits and how to persuade customers to embrace that change:



    “I don’t feel there is a limit to designing cars for the future. The only issue is how we walk with our customer into the future, because the customer’s appetite for change is what we must relate to. Sometimes, depending on culture, the customer can be slightly conservative. This also depends on their social situation, but sometimes they are ambitious and expect significant design changes.

    “I think premium customers are open to change if we provide a clear benefit to them. It’s important; if you change something significant, there must be very clear customer benefit. If there is not, the customer will reject it because they have so many good choices in the marketplace.

    “In reality, the modern user experience and how it relates to and works with the owner has a much higher value than piping or wood on an interior, and I feel there is a great potential in the coming digital technologies.”

    ROB MELVILLE, McLaren chief designer, on whether driver-focused supercars are less likely to change than conventional cars:



    “They’ll change too — and soon. Our philosophy is to create breathtaking designs that tell the visual story of their function, and we have an amazing bandwidth of functionality and focus coming in our products. We plan to do this by using our advanced technologies, aerodynamic software and manufacturing processes to create our beautiful yet functional designs. We will continue to be brave and innovate.

    “Clever design will be the dominant force and will always predominate over new legislation, which is an opportunity to find new solutions and make cars even more individual. It’s an exciting challenge for the team. The freeing up of crash structures will mean improved aerodynamics, which is fantastic, and the interior space/ volume of the car will be designed to suit our vehicle’s requirements.

    “Customers will accept the changes as long as it is authentic, radical design. Radical design just to be trendy lacks integrity and this turns customers off. Our customers are very sophisticated and appreciate radical design that delivers improved experience, usability and fun. It has to put a smile on your face.”

    STEFAN SIELAFF, Bentley director of design, on ultra-luxury design — and a history lesson:



    “Maybe ‘transport boxes’ will be part of the future, but it will go one step at a time and I can say our customers want our cars because they make a statement, not just because they do a job.

    “Bentley will always follow a fusion of performance and luxury; dynamics must be part of the mixture. But even if sometimes you will want to turn the seats around and leave the control to the systems, sometimes, at the right times, our customers will want to drive. It’s a compromise we know at Bentley; for 100 years our owners have done the same, albeit with chauffeurs driving.

    “The question is not just about design but also technology. How will that change what we want from the interior space? And even if we give people more space, it won’t be about just opening the car up. Our customers want architecture, not just space.

    “I am old enough to remember East and West Germany. In the East there was basically one car, a Trabant, available in five colours. The day the Berlin Wall came down, people were clamouring to change. That history lesson suggests there is no desire to own cars that look identical.”
     
  25. Tenney

    Tenney F1 Rookie
    Consultant

    Feb 21, 2001
    4,291
    #4400 Tenney, Nov 15, 2016
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    As Fitz & Van were charged w/conveying the look of the "Wide Track" era, maybe they just made sure their creative licenses were current and then had at it?

    Always thought the kinda Peter Max-like Rapid Transit System stuff was cool, too ...
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     

Share This Page