If I could change some rules for the WDC... | FerrariChat

If I could change some rules for the WDC...

Discussion in 'F1' started by itschris, Dec 1, 2016.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. itschris

    itschris Formula 3

    Sep 15, 2011
    1,545
    Florida
    Full Name:
    Chris
    So my daughter who's in law school shot me a txt a couple days ago. She started watching the races with me every once in awhile... but she does actually get into it. This is what she sent: "how can Nico win the championship when he's lost all the last races?"

    I thought it was an interesting question because even though I explained and she understood the points and all that, she was dismayed that you can (in her mind anyway) cruise at then end and still get a WDC. Obviously that's oversimplified, but you get the jist.

    It's not secret that I'm not a fan of Rosberg's way of racing. I don't take anything away from him... he's a deserving, albeit calculating driver who played it safe to get what he wanted. Smart, but uninspiring and my daughter who's a fan from the outside looking in called it how she and probably a lot of people who aren't knee deep into the sport see it. I mean this post to be less about Nico and more just about the thrill of racing and competitiveness in general. I like Nico fine enough... this isn't an assault on him... just how racing point systems work. In fact, I like how NASCAR does their chase concept and wonder if that could be adopted somehow.

    But it also got me thinking. How do you avoid the situation where a driver knows they no longer have to win any more races to be WDC? The double points things was just stupid and unfair. I don't like the idea that someone can pull off one good Sunday and get rewarded like that. I do, however, think some modification is in order to put more emphasis on not just winning but having to continue to win. So I was thinking that once the second half of the season started the points were weighted differently? What if each race there was a one point change each race? Or a half point or something. Something to incentivize the drivers to keep winning... that they need to keep winning.... not a windfall... but a gradual change through the course of the season so that you can't just take second and still win. It's probably not super applicable in this current scenario because Nico certainly won his fair share of races, but it would have been nice if he had to do better than 2nd the last several races to win.
     
  2. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Mar 24, 2008
    42,714
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas
    No idea on how the chase concept works but don't see what's the issue. He's done well enough all year to be able to cruise the remaining races. He won the 4 opening races...reverse your daughters idea, should Hamilton not be eligible for the title because of that?
     
  3. JWeiss

    JWeiss F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Nov 18, 2010
    12,177
    NYC and Long Island, NY
    Full Name:
    JWeiss
    I'd ask your daughter how Lewis could win the championship when he'd lost all those earlier races? I don't think it's about the point system per se, but rather simply about adding up a season-long record. I'm not sure I understand the difference between early- and late-season races from a W/L perspective. Do any other major sports differentiate across the season? The major US sports don't.
     
  4. JWeiss

    JWeiss F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Nov 18, 2010
    12,177
    NYC and Long Island, NY
    Full Name:
    JWeiss
    I wasted some time putting "per se" in italics and Bas beat me to the punch. Anyway, I'm with Bas on this.
     
  5. daytona355

    daytona355 F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Mar 25, 2009
    12,655
    London
    Full Name:
    Sid Korshak
    Spot on chaps.... why does good strategy from Nico suddenly mean we have to change the points system, no one wanted it changed when Elton was winning things, and remember, that donut came fifth to get his title in 2008, the least deserved title in Motorsport to date
     
  6. itschris

    itschris Formula 3

    Sep 15, 2011
    1,545
    Florida
    Full Name:
    Chris
    Okay... I guess I didn't make myself clear enough... this wasn't about Nico... per se... more about taking away the ability to not - not always drive to win. I think winning should be the ultimate goal each race... not driving to come in a safe and comfortable second. This isn't a Lewis vs. Nico thing. If you look at NASCAR's chase concept, I believe everything gets scrapped at the last race and it's between the four top drivers and whomever wins get the prize. So you're incentivized to win throughout the season but you can't let up. There's no ability to play it safe.
     
  7. daytona355

    daytona355 F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Mar 25, 2009
    12,655
    London
    Full Name:
    Sid Korshak
    It's a season long challenge, not a cup competition, it would cheapen the WDC if all you had to do was bring your A game to race 21
     
  8. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Mar 24, 2008
    42,714
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas
    +1
     
  9. itschris

    itschris Formula 3

    Sep 15, 2011
    1,545
    Florida
    Full Name:
    Chris
    That's not how it works though. You have to get into the chase by being a top driver. I'm not say F1 should adopt what NASCAR is doing, but I would like to see some sort of change that puts more of an emphasis of having to race to win. So I was simply considering an alternative to what we have. If race wins become more and more important throughout the season, that could makes thing very interesting. If someone does really well at first but starts to become eclipsed, there's less a chance that driver would continue to challenge for the WDC. So in some respects the WDC weighs the "what is" more than "what was" throughout the season. I mean theoretically, if there are many different winners and inconsistency, someone could come in second all year... never win a race,.. and be crowned WDC.
     
  10. WPOZZZ

    WPOZZZ F1 Veteran

    Aug 22, 2012
    6,508
    Honolulu, HI
    One could say the same about last season. Lewis won the WDC, but lost the last three races. Of course, he did have the WDC in the bag after he won in Austin.
     
  11. GordonC

    GordonC F1 Rookie
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Aug 28, 2005
    4,163
    Calgary, AB, Canada
    Full Name:
    Gordon
    The points system has evolved over the decades... go back to the early 80s and prior, and drivers had to drop 1 result from each half of the season. Without looking it up, I believe some WDCs would be different if every results counted to the season end.

    In the 2000s, they tinkered with the points system twice - first, giving 10 points for first rather than 9 points, with points going only for the first 6 finishers as had been used prior; then changing to points for the top 10 finishers. You could go back and rescore previous seasons and see WDC results change if using a newer scoring system.

    A few years ago, Bernie proposed Olympic scoring, giving gold, silver, bronze medals only, with the WDC going to the driver with... the most golds? I don't recall if he ever elaborated.
     
  12. 05011994

    05011994 Formula 3
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    May 1, 2004
    1,865
    Golden, Colorado
    Sorry the NASCAR chase thing is contrived. The points do not need to be revised, it is the lack of competition between teams and the forced lack of development to allow other teams to catch up that needs work. How have NASCAR's rating gone since it introduced the chase concept?

    Provide compelling cars and close racing at venues that people like and want to go to, the sport survives. Stay on the current course or knee jerk regulation changes and faking being "green" at tracks no cares about and F1 follows the road to extinction.
     
  13. ago car nut

    ago car nut F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Aug 29, 2008
    5,495
    Madison Ohio
    Full Name:
    David A.
    I believe the points system was changed When MS was dominating in the early part of the century. I really miss those days. The noise the, the enthusiasm etc.
     
  14. singletrack

    singletrack F1 Veteran

    Mar 16, 2011
    5,805
    Pittsburgh, PA
    The chase!? Seriously!? The chase? The chase is utter garbage.

    Here's a fact on the chase:

    Harvick would have been the 2015 and 2016 champion on normal rules. Jimmie would have been 6th in 2015 and 8th in 2016. 8th!

    The chase rewards luck more than consistent performance. NASCAR ratings are down also.

    They introduced the double points in F1 for the last race a couple of years ago, then threw it out. That would have forced Nico to race for the win in the last race just as a point of reference. I'm still not in favor of double points or changing the fundamentals of racing to please the crowd. NASCAR has proven that won't help ratings.
     
  15. daytona355

    daytona355 F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Mar 25, 2009
    12,655
    London
    Full Name:
    Sid Korshak
    WDC is about the most consistent driver over the season, not the one who happens to win the most races, it's about every position he finishes in. For example, Button wouldn't have been a champ in 2009 without the current rules, as his car became less and less dominant as the season wore on, same for many others.

    If you start handicapping winners, you are manipulating results, and thereby then definitely have the ability to 'create' a false champ, rather than anything else.

    It may not be ideal for Nico to have played for second these last four races, but in his case it would have meant dicing with a driver who showed full well in Spain he is happy to smash him off the track and argue about it later. If he had been fighting an intelligent driver - a ricciardo, Vettel, Alonso etc - you would likely have seen him vie for the win. This season needed a different approach due to the bipolar nature of his competitor, who also happened to be his teammate. I think he drove extremely well all season, it still takes skill to control his results to second, and he showed Elton throughout the season he is just as fast as him, but has much more race intelligence. Any fool can be fast and aggressive in corners, forcing others off track, fewer can control their drives and make the most of their advantages at the right time. Schumi and Prost were masters of it, Alonso has it too. Elton? He's like a bull in a china shop - good when he has a car advantage and everything goes right, falls to pieces when he faces adversity - proven with his continual moaning about who changes his tyres and operates his jacks!
     
  16. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 3, 2006
    27,641
    #16 william, Dec 2, 2016
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2016
    The championship is fine as it is.
    Leave it alone !
    It rewards consistency and speed OVER THE WHOLE SEASON, not just during the last 4 races.
     
  17. Igor Ound

    Igor Ound F1 Veteran

    Sep 30, 2012
    8,102
    The Horn
    Full Name:
    Igor Ound
    Double point last race!
     
  18. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 3, 2006
    27,641
    +1
     
  19. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 3, 2006
    27,641

    Nope.

    Awarding more points to the last race devalues all the others.

    Let's not turn the Drivers Championship into a dog and pony show.
     
  20. The Surveyor

    The Surveyor Karting

    Nov 11, 2015
    179
    Newcastle, England
    Full Name:
    Paul Spensley
    What ever the system of points was put in place, the drivers and manufacturers would still target the results they need to give them the overall Championship. I actually enjoyed the last few races knowing that Nico had to finish to gain the WDC and any serious mechanical or accident would have spoilt his campaign. F1 isn't just about the pure speed, for some it's the tactical 'chess' played by the teams which sets it above other formula. Anyway...

    A change in the points structure isn't what F1 needs, it needs closer racing, it needs Ferrari, Redbull, McLaren and Williams to step up and put a proper challenge to Mercedes so that there is a closer Championship.
     
  21. subirg

    subirg F1 Rookie

    Dec 19, 2003
    4,369
    Cheshire
    +1. It's fine as it is. Artificially engineering excitement through the points system is just symptomatic relief. To make the season more exciting we need a tech formula which doesn't result in one dominant team for 3 years at a time..!
     
  22. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 3, 2006
    27,641
    If one team does a better job than the others, it is fully entitled to dominate, as far as I am concerned. Handicapping the winner isn't what F1 is about.

    I any sport, you have periods where an individual or a team dominates; why should they be punished for it?

    F1 is at risk to be turned into a show business to satisfy commercial interests, and improve its audience by artificial means.
     
  23. subirg

    subirg F1 Rookie

    Dec 19, 2003
    4,369
    Cheshire
    Fully agree. Artificial 'spicing' up has no place in F1.

    2017 has enough excitement with the substantial change in tech regs to keep us all interested. Let's hope for a good outcome with more than one team in contention for WCC (and hence WDC).
     
  24. Etcetera

    Etcetera Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 7, 2003
    23,964
    Full Name:
    C6H14O5
    I don't care about outright dominance so long as teams are allowed to compete on a technical level, which they have not been allowed to do with limited development via the token system.

    In a sport that centers around competition, how they arrived at such a wildly noncompetitive set of rules is beyond the grasp of mere mortals.
     
  25. Whisky

    Whisky Three Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jan 27, 2006
    31,848
    In the flight path to Offutt
    Full Name:
    The original Fernando
    Like someone else said, how can you cruise thru the first half of the season
    and turn it on at the end?
    This is NO different than any other sport, be it football, baseball, hockey, teams
    'cruise' until they HAVE to win.
    Teams win divisions long before the season is over, and 'rest' key players. How is
    this fair to the fans?

    If this is such a problem in F1, they can do one of two things:
    1) Adopt a nascar-style 'playoff' system,
    or,
    2) Go back to the NORMAL 9-6-4-3-2-1 point system.

    I was never a fan of changing the points, but you all have to realize one thing:

    If they change the point system to ne what YOU want, abd it seems that some
    want Hamilton to win it, be careful what you wish for: it may make it impossible
    for any other drivers outside the top 2 to have a shot, or for any other TEAM
    to win the TEAM championship.
     

Share This Page