Renault finally protests Racing Point | Page 15 | FerrariChat

Renault finally protests Racing Point

Discussion in 'F1' started by jgonzalesm6, Jul 12, 2020.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 3, 2006
    27,678

    It's purely vexatory.

    If it would be in a UK civil court, the judge would bring a Contempt of Court against Renault.
     
  2. DF1

    DF1 Three Time F1 World Champ

    Both sides have a right to use the system presented to them. Ferrari are part of this now. I do not think they are wrong to seek 'clarity' on the rules etc. Clone Point have a right to appeal and defend. This is political F1. Nothing new.

    I think Renault have a point about its system told to be removed after Clone Point protested in Japan. Not at all un-reasonable.
     
  3. Simon^2

    Simon^2 F1 World Champ

    Oct 17, 2005
    12,313
    At Sea Level
    Sour looser?? ROFL!
     
  4. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 3, 2006
    27,678

    I see you point, but when you lodge a complain, you in fact transmit your case to a legal authority, to decide, and you must give it the time to deal with it.
    Each case is different, and whoever adjudicates on it may have a different position.
    There is no blanket answer to every complain.
    What's the point of Renault addressing the FIA, if they don't accept their findings?
    As it stands, the FIA cannot solve the problem more than the fine already given.
    Renault is seeking to embarrass the FIA more than Racing Point, IMO.
     
  5. DF1

    DF1 Three Time F1 World Champ

    Renault would like illegal parts removed as they had to remove theirs. They have stated this. Other teams want clarity. The ruling is inconsistent.
     
  6. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,626
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    No kidding the ruling is inconsistent: The car was legal in March and suddenly illegal now? BS.
     
    william likes this.
  7. DeSoto

    DeSoto F1 Veteran

    Nov 26, 2003
    7,795
    As far as I know, Renault has to protest each car at each race because if in the end the ruling favours them, Racing Point only would be disqualified from those races that were protested. So there is a technical reason for protesting everything, it´s not just a matter of ****ing Stroll (although that alone would be a very good reason anyway).
     
    375+ likes this.
  8. DeSoto

    DeSoto F1 Veteran

    Nov 26, 2003
    7,795
    Dude, you´ve been watching F1 for long enough to know that FIA is constantly changing what is legal and what is not depending on where´s the dough.

    Mercedes hasn´t signed on the dot line yet and there are signs of a possible mutiny of the rest, so they´ve realized that they can´t just sweep the Clone Point issue under the rug like I guess they expected to do.
     
  9. DF1

    DF1 Three Time F1 World Champ

    They should not sweep it. Its a clone not a created car at all. Im happy the FIA want to prevent exactly this next year. I had much more respect for Force India. An admirable team. Stroll is just a shortcut team now.
     
  10. DeSoto

    DeSoto F1 Veteran

    Nov 26, 2003
    7,795
    They have to sweep it under the rug, Mercedes and FIA officials could have colluded with this ****. It seems that the 400.000 € and the 15 points are not enough for Renault and Ferrari, but that´s just a minor issue.

    Now they´re talking about some vague rules to prevent it from happening again. But it will happen.
     
  11. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,626
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    Those who sit in the glass house should not throw with stones. That's not just my opinion but also the opinion of German motorsport journalists. Teams like Renault, McLaren and Ferrari have such a long history of cheating that they simply don't deserve to sit on their high horse on the pedastal.

    Regarding the cloned cars: If you read the rules, there are certain parts a team must make on their own and others they can buy off the shelf. The amount of parts they have to design themselves is rather limited. So while the RB might be a clone of the Merc 19, about 80% of that is a legal clone. So all those taking the high road about making their own cars, well, you really don't have to according to the rules. You could buy the majority of the parts legally from other teams and manufacturers. The idea of each team creating its own car from scratch is a romantic illusion at best. Get real.
     
    william and NeilF8888 like this.
  12. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 3, 2006
    27,678
    Racing Point doesn't seem to have alternative parts to fix.
    So if the FIA was to order the brake ducts to be removed, I gather the cars couldn't run.
    I guess the FIA had weighted that possibility, and prefers the car to keep racing.
     
  13. DeSoto

    DeSoto F1 Veteran

    Nov 26, 2003
    7,795
    "Mum he started it" is not a valid legal argument. And even if it was, Racing Point protested Renault last year, so why Renault shouldn't protest now?

    Get real? Come on... Get you facts straight!

    Where did you get the fact that 80% per cent of the car can be bought? I suppose that Stroll counted all the individual parts of, for example, the steering wheel, and then accounted the whole chassis as 1 single part, and then said: "oh, yeah, 80% of the parts can be bought". The monocoque and the bodywork (including floor and wings) can´t be bought; the internal packaging, the aero-balance, all the important work can´t be bought. They can only buy some pieces, and they even managed to screw it up illegally buying the brake ducts.

    So far, the only experts that have said that a car can be copied from pictures in a few months are Racing Point´s and FIA´s. All the rest I´ve heard of say that it can´t be done or, at best, look skeptic; these includes McLaren´s and William´s, who "misteriously" changed their minds after a few days. I guess Stroll and Co. are not so stupid to leave any loose knots, and I think that, for the good of the sport, in the end it´s better to let it go. But one thing is pretending that nothing happened and another is doing it for free and even applaud them for their "clever approach". I suppose that Stroll and Mercedes know that now they owe a favour, and sooner or later they´ll have to pay, that´s the way things always have happened in F1.
     
    375+ likes this.
  14. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,626
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    Maybe you should read more F1 related magazines?

    As I said, it's irrelevant what I think, it's more important what the expert journos have to say about it. The list of stuff you must build yourself is rather small. Most parts you can buy.
     
    william likes this.
  15. DeSoto

    DeSoto F1 Veteran

    Nov 26, 2003
    7,795
    And did you read the part that says that you can't buy them from other competitor?

    It's not the same buying from Dallara than from Mercedes.
     
  16. jgonzalesm6

    jgonzalesm6 Two Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Oct 31, 2016
    24,366
    Corpus Christi, Tx.
    Full Name:
    Joe R Gonzales
    Kolles: There is no way you can copy a car from photos


    Image Unavailable, Please Login


    Colin Kolles has kicked the hornet’s nest with claiming that it would be impossible for Racing Point to have built the handy RP20 by simply copying the Mercedes W10 from photographs and taking a swipe at Mercedes team principal Toto Wolff by questioning his motives.

    Racing Point was protested by Renault, upon which the FIA ruled that brake-ducts used this season on the RP20 were not a listed part, one that requires teams to design the components inhouse.

    Otmar Szafnauer admitted that their technical team did actually copy the title-winning Mercedes of last year, but are adamant the did so within the realms of the regulations and thus have appealed the fine and 15 points docked by the FIA.

    A qualified dentist by trade who has also run F1 and WEC teams, Kolles was speaking during a Sport1 TV talk show when asked about the process of designing an F1 car from concept to rollout.

    “There is no way you can copy a car from photos. It’s not only the brake ducts, it’s also about the entire concept. I was told they were given access to a 60% wind-tunnel model and an F1 show car as a blueprint, from this the parts were scanned and converted to CAD,” he explained.

    “It would not work any other way,” insisted Kolles, who has previously crossed swords with Mercedes boss Toto Wolff, when in 2013 he taped a conversation between the pair and threatened to expose explosive comments made by the Austrian.

    They reportedly settled their dispute with intervention by Formula 1 supremo Bernie
    Ecclestone, while Mercedes obtained a court order preventing the publication of the details of the conversation.

    During yesterday’s talk show, after the Spanish Grand Prix, Kolles took another swipe at his old foe Wolff, who now has a share in Lawrence Stroll’s Aston Martin project.

    While there is no doubt the alliance between teams and their bosses have become a lot cosier since the Canadian billionaire saved Force India and launched Racing Point which, in turn, will morph into Aston Martin next year.

    Kolles continued, “Basically if I were a Mercedes group board member, I would be asking why the team principal is always on vacation, on a boat or visiting Gstaad. These are among many things which, in my opinion, have not been totally compliant.

    “I believe they have a very, very close connection. Although this is my own personal opinion I know I am not alone and others there are others that share this opinion too,” added Kolles, now team principal with ByKolles Racing WEC team.

    https://www.grandprix247.com/2020/08/17/kolles-there-is-no-way-you-can-copy-a-car-from-photos/



    Former team boss claims Racing Point received Mercedes wind tunnel model and show car


    A former Formula 1 team principal has made new claims over how Racing Point ‘re-engineered’ last year’s Mercedes to create its RP20.

    In an interview with German television channel Sport 1 on Sunday Colin Kolles alleged the team received a wind tunnel scale model and show car from Mercedes.



    Kolles ran Racing Point fore-runners Jordan and Midland in 2005 and 2006. He later took charge of HRT and Caterham’s Formula 1 teams. He has run his own sportscar team since leaving F1 at the end of 2014.

    Two weeks ago Racing Point was fined €400,000 and docked 15 points from its constructors’ championship for using brake ducts which FIA stewards ruled were based on parts it obtained from Mercedes. Racing Point had legitimately obtained ‘listed parts’ from Mercedes, but brake ducts were redefined as ‘non-listed parts’, which teams must design themselves, from 2020.

    Racing Point has said it relied on photography of Mercedes’ championship-winning W10 to produce its duplicate of the machine. But Kolles rejected that claim, and said he believed the team had other sources of information.



    Image Unavailable, Please Login

    “From photos you cannot copy a car,” Kolles told Sport 1. “It’s not just about the brake ducts. It’s about the whole concept of the car. It was not just copied from photos.



    “[They did not have] just parts, they also had certain data. And they had, so I was told, a 60% wind tunnel model and a [full size] show car as a template, from which parts were scanned and then converted into CAD data. Otherwise the concept could not work.”

    A 60% scale wind tunnel model is the maximum size Formula 1 teams are allowed to use. Kolles did not specify which seasons either of the designs originated from.

    He also raised questions over Mercedes team principal Toto Wolff. A major dispute between the pair is known to have taken place in mid-2013.

    Kolles queried the nature of the relationship between Wolff and Racing Point owner Lawrence Stroll. Wolff, a shareholder in Mercedes’ Formula 1 team, bought a stake in Stroll’s Aston Martin company earlier this year.

    “As the Mercedes group I would basically ask myself why the Mercedes team boss is always on vacation, on [Stroll’s] boat or in Gstaad,” said Kolles. “Many other things have happened that, in my opinion, were not entirely compliant.



    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Racing Point’s RP20 is based on last year’s Mercedes
    “I think they have a very, very close connection. This is my personal opinion. But that’s not just my opinion – other people have that opinion too.”


    Kolles was close to former Formula 1 chief executive Bernie Ecclestone during his time in the sport, and pointed out several times during the interview he maintains many contacts within the paddock.

    On Saturday Wolff rejected the suggestion Racing Point’s copying of their car had gone beyond the use of photographs and branded claims to the contrary as “total nonsense”.

    “Copying the car more than from photos is something we would know [about],” he said. “That’s why from my perspective it’s total nonsense to pursue that argument. And I will be defending our brand firmly if somebody were to go down that route.”

    Mercedes and Racing Point have been approached for comment.

    https://www.racefans.net/2020/08/17/former-f1-team-boss-racing-point-mercedes-wind-tunnel-model-show-car/
     
    stavura, 375+, fil and 1 other person like this.
  17. DF1

    DF1 Three Time F1 World Champ

    The entire episode of the clone is intriguing. Testing saw most all teams look at the new Clone and immediately recognize it as Mercedes. Duck - walk and talk no? lol :)
     
  18. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 3, 2006
    27,678
    Now Colin Kolles doing his dirty washing in public to settle an earlier dispute with Toto Wolff.
    The Racing Point saga continues...
     
  19. DF1

    DF1 Three Time F1 World Champ

    So happy F1 is back lol :)
     
  20. jpalmito

    jpalmito F1 Veteran

    Jun 5, 2009
    8,273
    Le caylar (France)
    Full Name:
    mathieu Jeantet
    Looks like Formula one is so complex nowadays that the FIA couldn't check everything because of it's lack of human ressources or compétences.
     
  21. Mitch Alsup

    Mitch Alsup F1 Veteran

    Nov 4, 2003
    9,730
    I wonder what Ferrari's position would be if Racing Points was DQ from the first several races ONLY if Ferrari engine of 2019 was made public ?
     
  22. Mitch Alsup

    Mitch Alsup F1 Veteran

    Nov 4, 2003
    9,730
    What if FIA called ALL teams to remove ALL brake ducts ?!?!
     
  23. ingegnere

    ingegnere F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Sep 12, 2004
    5,566
    Montreal
    Pretty obvious that the FIA has nothing on Ferrari or they would have made it public like they did with their ruling on tRP’s ducts.

    If the FIA improperly received information that they used to try to understand how Ferrari operates their engine—because despite multiple additional instrumentation added, they couldn’t determine any illegality—and Ferrari threatened to sue for illegally obtaining proprietary IP, that’s a whole ‘nother kettle of fish.

    As far as FIA can determine, all teams’ engines are being operated to the regulations or the latter would have been reprimanded. Instead, the FIA can only make new tech directives—like the upcoming one that everyone assumes is aimed at Mercedes—to try to control playing around the boundaries of the rules.
     
  24. DF1

    DF1 Three Time F1 World Champ

    Reduced speeds and closer racing due to excessive heat in brake system. Now that would lead to brake and tire 'management' lol :)
     
  25. NeilF8888

    NeilF8888 Formula 3

    Feb 10, 2005
    1,174
    Miami Beach
    You can’t compare Ferrari’s influence on the FIA in comparison to RP. Ferrari is obviously down on power this year because of the FIA not allowing the engine advances in question. Ferrari just had the power to keep the improper engine advantage confidential and retain its points. If disqualification and all points were removed last year they could of threatened leaving F1 and the FIA would have avoided that situation by making Ferrari change the engine, but spare Ferrari the negative publicity and the points. Ferrari has been in F1 from the beginning and deserves some recognition for its loyalty.

    Racing Point doesn’t have this influence and is being made an example of even though the rules were vague. The FIA wants stop the cloning loophole and Racing Point is paying the price, how can you be convicted of copying intellectual property you already owned the previous year. It’s ludicrous and all politics.
    Renault and Ferrari should drop their appeal and Racing Point should just accept the FIA decision and move on.
     
    tifosi12 likes this.

Share This Page