Ferrari F8 Tributo | Page 214 | FerrariChat

Ferrari F8 Tributo

Discussion in '458 Italia/488/F8' started by Ferrari 308 GTB, Feb 28, 2019.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Condor Man

    Condor Man F1 Rookie
    Rossa Subscribed

    Sep 8, 2006
    4,938
    Los Angeles
    I would say the Speciale was better looking than a 488 and the Pista is the best of them all.

    Just my 2 cents


    May the Horse be with you
     
    paulchua and GT2goneF like this.
  2. GT2goneF

    GT2goneF F1 Rookie

    May 28, 2020
    2,861
    Southern California
    I agree

    Sent from my BLA-A09 using FerrariChat.com mobile app
     
  3. MANDALAY

    MANDALAY F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    May 23, 2013
    14,642
    AUSTRALIA
    Full Name:
    ANGELO
    Just shows you it can be done. Buggered why Ferrari didn't take the same approach. I just don't get it. Early with Turbos, and now early with GPF and probably will be early on full Electric car :(
     
    ferrarifanatic25 likes this.
  4. MANDALAY

    MANDALAY F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    May 23, 2013
    14,642
    AUSTRALIA
    Full Name:
    ANGELO

    So its all about dialing up the PSI
     
  5. ....
     

    Attached Files:

  6. Lukeylikey

    Lukeylikey F1 Rookie
    Silver Subscribed

    Mar 3, 2012
    3,661
    UK
    Because CO2 and particulates are very different. In fact they tend to be inverse - reduce CO2 and you increase particulates. Ferrari's system is more expensive and sophisticated and reduces CO2 more effectively - for example, on the EU combined cycle Ferrari have been able to reduce the F8's CO2 by 2gm/km over the 50hp less powerful 488. Direct injection has significant benefits for the metering of fuel under a very wide set of scenarios used in throttle mapping. However, one downside is that carbon deposits are left on the intake port and also it seems that control of particulates is harder, necessitating the GPF. In essence, DI gives the engine management system much better control over fuelling, especially effective under WOT applications, and is generally considered a better system for sports cars.

    You can, of course, look and see that the quoted CO2 for the 720 is actually lower than the F8, so why is it necessary? One reason can be that engines are tuned to minimise CO2 output on the test cycle, which recreates only a fraction of the scenarios you will encounter in the real world. The benefits of DI are also not limited to lower CO2, but things like reducing knock and improving response are key benefits. You can get more power, torque and have better control over how that is delivered. Again, the 720 is very powerful, probably more than the F8. McLaren have to find other ways of achieving that since you could conclude it is 'more powerful, in spite of being port-injected' rather than because of it. The control benefit over fuelling still stands with a DI engine though.

    Each manufacturer chooses what it wants to do but clearly Ferrari agree with the traditional view that DI is more modern and offers benefits that their older port-injection engines do not. From my own experience with now two of their GPF-equipped cars, as well as retaining some of my older non-GPF Ferraris, I'm personally really not worried by GPF in the slightest. I enjoy the sound of both my 812 and F8 and Speciale and Pista, and frankly, when you hear today that the EU are proposing even stricter CO2 reductions for their whole economy by 2030, post Covid (55% instead of 40%), a GPF-or-not equipped F8 is the least of the problems facing those who enjoy ICE.
     
    GT2goneF and MANDALAY like this.
  7. xskier

    xskier Formula Junior

    Mar 2, 2013
    361
    Mclaren is considered by the EU as a small volume factory producing under 10 000 cars per year and there for into this special regulation to introduce the GPF just in 2021 and not in 2019/20. There for all Mclaren cars homologated in 2020 do mot have the GPF (including 765lt, Elva, Speedtail) New models homologated in 2021, do need the particular filter if soled in the EU. Porsche, Lamborghini = VAG Group, large manufactures, Ferrari over 10 000cars there for GPF for 2020.
     
  8. JTSE30

    JTSE30 F1 Rookie

    Oct 1, 2004
    3,559
    Austin TX
    Could you provide links indicating this because Ferrari is also SVM (small volume manufacturer, far fewer than 10,000 per year registered in EU, http://www.esca-online.eu/ ) and would have same exemption except their derogation was only until CY2020 (calendar year 2020), all the big manufacturers were to have GPF from September 2018 (that's why so many models were cancelled at that time)
    https://ec.europa.eu/growth/content/clean-mobility-new-emissions-tests-become-mandatory-all-new-cars-1-september-2018_en

    The SVM is more about exemptions from CO2 regulations than Particulate Emissions, for instance:

    https://www.motoringresearch.com/car-news/koenigsegg-geneva-show-coronavirus/
    "Koenigsegg claims that with its state-of-the-art particulate filters and renewable fuel, the car could clean London’s air as it drives around."

    more from:
    http://www.esca-online.eu/issues/emissions/

    Moreover, small volume car manufacturers responsible for less than 1,000 new car registrations in the EU also benefit from a de-minimis exemption under the CO2 Regulation ESCA fully supports the exemption regime as the derogation procedures are a lengthy and complicated processes, requiring significant resources for both the European Commission and ESCA members. Indeed, according to the Commission’s impact assessment, the scale of CO2 emissions from vehicles produced by manufacturers registering less than 1,000 cars a year is estimated to be around 5,000 tonnes per year, “which is a marginal impact”.[1] Excluding the first 1,000 cars from EU CO2 legislation will not generate any issue in terms of competitiveness, as vehicles produced in this range typically do not have competition from large volume manufacturers.
     
  9. buddyg

    buddyg F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed

    Sep 20, 2004
    6,291
    Naples, FL
    Full Name:
    Buddy
    So stupid!
     
    GT2goneF and Dicecal like this.
  10. Coincid

    Coincid F1 Rookie

    Dec 9, 2014
    3,605
    Canada
    I was beside the new red Corvette on the road today and I was disappointed in the appearance. It had a plastic look about it and the rear is clumsily fashioned. A confused amalgam of straight lines, angles, and the vents were very cheap looking. Overall, it’s acceptable at its price point but no knowledgeable observer would mistake it for a super car.
     
    Dicecal and SVCalifornia like this.
  11. carz80am

    carz80am Formula Junior

    Sep 23, 2015
    694
    I have a new red c8, and the msrp on mine is $65k. For that price point its more than fair. 0-60 under 3 seconds, v8, mid engine, handles well, removable targa top, sounds good with performance exhaust and gets a ton of looks. Nothing like my F8, but for under 100k its more than fair.
     
  12. Coincid

    Coincid F1 Rookie

    Dec 9, 2014
    3,605
    Canada
    I was simply commenting on the appearance. The performance / price ratio is very high .
     
    carz80am likes this.
  13. GT2goneF

    GT2goneF F1 Rookie

    May 28, 2020
    2,861
    Southern California
    Where's the "Don't like" button
     
  14. GT2goneF

    GT2goneF F1 Rookie

    May 28, 2020
    2,861
    Southern California
    I guess it could be worse... ICE with GPF vs full electric... I will die burning dinosaurs, albeit efficiently and quieter....
     
  15. GT2goneF

    GT2goneF F1 Rookie

    May 28, 2020
    2,861
    Southern California
    That is a very good point as well. It does depend on volume generated as well.
     
  16. GT2goneF

    GT2goneF F1 Rookie

    May 28, 2020
    2,861
    Southern California
    Agreed... This is a very cheap under powered "supercar" (using the term loosely). There are many cosmetic and poor quality manufacturing defects.
     
  17. SoCal to az

    SoCal to az F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Nov 25, 2012
    15,085
    Arizona
    I really liked this car when it was first released. I’ve several on the road now. It’s crap.
     
  18. RamsHmb

    RamsHmb Formula 3
    Rossa Subscribed

    Jan 22, 2017
    1,226
    San Francisco
    Full Name:
    James
    Drove the demo today ad f of sv and was very impressed. I am more of a v12 guy and while I have owned a 458...just wasn’t dying to get an f8. That changed during a short drive. So usable, lovable and just right. I love how Porsche can keep pumping out versions of the 911 but Ferrari needs to do more between interactions...I think Ferrari is doing just fine.
     
    Coincid and Ash Patel like this.
  19. GT2goneF

    GT2goneF F1 Rookie

    May 28, 2020
    2,861
    Southern California
    Me too. I was very excited when it was announced and had very high expectations. Then it came out... I guess I really had very high expectations. I guess gonna have to wait for ZR1. However, I am afraid that it will become another straight line, dangerously over powered american car. Sits too high, looks a little disproportional, I don't like the interiors and there are a few major cosmetic issues.

    If they want to compete with the best, generally speaking about European Supercars, you have to blow them out of the water, You cant pretend to create and average vehicle. It has to excel in design, interior, exterior and performance with little to no errors.

    Only car american car that can still make headlines within the European Supercar community is the Ford GT and they made the car an overpriced underpowered beautifully designed car, because they could. The already had a name for themselves. I wonder what they will come up with next.
     
  20. GT2goneF

    GT2goneF F1 Rookie

    May 28, 2020
    2,861
    Southern California
    One thing I don't like about Porsche ( and I am a proud owner of a beautiful GT2 and a fan) is that they bastardize their line up (Mercedes also jumped into that strategy, not as terrible as Porsche). Porsche has the Carrera, Carrera S, C4, C4S, GTS, Turbo, Turbo S, GT3, GT3 Touring, GT2 (not released since 997 chassis, not sure if it will come back again, no news. I assume it will), GT2RS, 911R, 911 RSR (track only), 935 (track only and super special edition). Once they went all Turbo, I was hoping they would stick only with just Turbo and Turbo S, but financially knew it wouldn't happen so I hoped that they would then have Carrera 2RWD (turbo entry level), C4S (Turbo), Carrera Turbo S, GT3, GT3RS, GT2, GT2 RS and forget all other models, including stupid GTS. Of course, it didn't happen and now they're even using that nomenclature for the Taycan (That I will never understand). But who am I...
     
    RamsHmb, Coincid and SoCal to az like this.
  21. italiafan

    italiafan F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jul 19, 2006
    16,121
    Full Name:
    Stickbones Swagglesmith
    Porsche makes something other than GT cars? Who knew!?
    :)
     

Share This Page