FORMULA 1 HEINEKEN GRANDE PREMIO DE SAO PAULO 2021 - Sao Paulo - Qualifying ▄▀▄▀▄▀ SPOILERS▄▀▄▀▄▀ | Page 6 | FerrariChat

FORMULA 1 HEINEKEN GRANDE PREMIO DE SAO PAULO 2021 - Sao Paulo - Qualifying ▄▀▄▀▄▀ SPOILERS▄▀▄▀▄▀

Discussion in 'F1' started by jgonzalesm6, Nov 12, 2021.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Phil~

    Phil~ F1 Rookie
    Rossa Subscribed

    Aug 25, 2013
    3,937
    Potomac, Maryland
    Max should have stayed away from the car. Idiot move.
     
    tazz99 and Nembo1777 like this.
  2. Top speed

    Top speed Formula Junior

    Jul 4, 2020
    871
    Full Name:
    Joonas
    Sorry, but a really bad take. Rules are rules, doesn't matter if it's the first race or the last. There is nothing to think about; Hamilton did the Q in a car that had an illegal advantage, doesn't matter if toothfairy or anyone else tampered with the rear wing, it was illegal and that's that.
     
    classic308 and Picchu88 like this.
  3. jgonzalesm6

    jgonzalesm6 Two Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Oct 31, 2016
    24,277
    Corpus Christi, Tx.
    Full Name:
    Joe R Gonzales
    That's a better angle of Max and Lewis's car.

    The notion that Max has super-human strength to alter the DRS infringement is ludicrous, ridiculous and farfetched.
     
    375+, sammysaber, Bas and 2 others like this.
  4. jpalmito

    jpalmito F1 Veteran

    Jun 5, 2009
    8,273
    Le caylar (France)
    Full Name:
    mathieu Jeantet

    Mercedes and the FIA are trying to put on the same level two types of offences that have absolutely not the same scope and consequences.
    If Max were punished for that, it would be a disgrace to this sport.
     
  5. ricksb

    ricksb F1 Veteran

    Apr 12, 2005
    9,975
    Montclair Village
    Full Name:
    B. Ricks
    i don’t think they will go after that angle. It sounds like they are challenging that he broke parc ferme rules by inspecting their car.

    Stay around long enough and you’ll see everything in F1…my head hurts.
     
    sammysaber, jgonzalesm6 and Bas like this.
  6. Jeronimo GTO

    Jeronimo GTO Formula 3
    Silver Subscribed

    May 15, 2010
    2,173
    #wecheatasone
     
    Bas likes this.
  7. sp1der

    sp1der F1 Rookie

    Jan 10, 2009
    3,007
    UK
    Full Name:
    Simon Ashley
  8. sp1der

    sp1der F1 Rookie

    Jan 10, 2009
    3,007
    UK
    Full Name:
    Simon Ashley
    My guess is Mercedes will suddenly lose top speed in this race, probably linked to have to preserve engines ;)
     
    Jeronimo GTO, 375+ and Bas like this.
  9. ricksb

    ricksb F1 Veteran

    Apr 12, 2005
    9,975
    Montclair Village
    Full Name:
    B. Ricks
    If they are both excluded (I don’t know upon what grounds it can happen to Max) it will be all ‘about the show’, integrity be damned. Unfortunately, I think that is the state of F1, but I’d be surprised if this happens. LH would be excluded because the drs would need to be adjusted but parc ferme doesn’t allow this after qualifying. Max would be excluded for? Being an ‘unauthorized mechanic inspecting a rival team’? Is there an auto-penalty for this action?
     
    Jeronimo GTO, sammysaber and Bas like this.
  10. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Mar 24, 2008
    42,708
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas
    Challenge indeed.

    I mean in the same rules it's also illegal for team members to touch each other before being weighed (as potentially they could slip weights in his suit). Yet no one ever complained about it.
     
    375+ likes this.
  11. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Mar 24, 2008
    42,708
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas
  12. jgonzalesm6

    jgonzalesm6 Two Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Oct 31, 2016
    24,277
    Corpus Christi, Tx.
    Full Name:
    Joe R Gonzales
    AMuS

    Even Red Bull admits that the Hamilton DRS case was probably a manufacturing fault or done by accident. This is supported by the fact that the rear wing on Bottas' complied with the rules. This explains why the BOT was 5.5 km/h slower than his teammate on the straight.


    not AMuS

    A technical infringement is a technical infringement, I can’t think of a time the FIA has ever been forgiving in that respect, even if it’s a manufacturing fault.

    Max touching a car is a sporting code infringement, they’re usually less severe in their punishment.

    Expect Max to get a formal reprimand and Lewis to get a pit lane start with a new rear wing assembly.

    The delay in the hearing is probably so Mercedes can present evidence it was a manufacturing defect or set up issue.

    I don’t believe they purposely broke the rules, I also dont believe the FIA will be lenient, technical regulations are usually pretty black and white.
     
    sammysaber and Nortonious like this.
  13. classic308

    classic308 F1 Veteran

    Jan 9, 2004
    6,820
    Westchester, NY
    Full Name:
    Paul
    Max should have stayed away from the illegal car. Idiot move.

    fixed it for you.
     
  14. DeSoto

    DeSoto F1 Veteran

    Nov 26, 2003
    7,792
    How Red Bull knew that there was something smelly in that rear wing? Because I doubt both incidents are unrelated.
     
  15. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Mar 24, 2008
    42,708
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas
    I genuinely don't know if merc did it intentionally or not. Let's just say, interesting timing for it.

    I agree, reprimand max, only purely to make clear that from now on its not tolerated (even though it always was before)
     
  16. subirg

    subirg F1 Rookie

    Dec 19, 2003
    4,369
    Cheshire
    The teams are not complete clowns. They know their cars are scrutineered all weekend long. There is zero chance that Merc deliberately chose to fit an illegal wing on Hams car hoping to get away with it. That’s just Hollywood fantasy stuff, not what happens in the real world.

    Regardless, the regs are the regs and if there is a breach, Merc have to take the punishment.

    As for the max incident - I doubt very much that there will be any penalty beyond a slapped wrist and no cookies at bed time.
     
    ricksb likes this.
  17. subirg

    subirg F1 Rookie

    Dec 19, 2003
    4,369
    Cheshire
    I was actually referring to the risk of penalties for Max, not Hamilton. But don’t let that get in the way of your obvious paranoia!
     
  18. sp1der

    sp1der F1 Rookie

    Jan 10, 2009
    3,007
    UK
    Full Name:
    Simon Ashley
    Nothing will happen the fia will declare their tape measure was wrong.
     
    tazz99 and ingegnere like this.
  19. DF1

    DF1 Three Time F1 World Champ

    Given they were protesting he had no business near the car as rules provide. He is not allowed. Stupid move. Applies to any driver. Learn the rules.
     
  20. ingegnere

    ingegnere F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Sep 12, 2004
    5,566
    Montreal
    They will create a committee to redefine the definition of a millimeter.
     
    tazz99 and Flavio_C like this.
  21. DF1

    DF1 Three Time F1 World Champ

    The rules are not set in Mercedes hand but FIA. Max broke the rule and there is a punishment available. I would not think there is negotiation. We hear little from RedBull given its on video of the violation by Max.

    Same for Mercedes>>They know they are starting at the back if held to account.

    Not hard to judge any of this.


    https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/the-key-issues-behind-the-hamilton-verstappen-f1-investigations/6776601/
    What could the penalties be?
    It is not impossible that both drivers could be excluded from qualifying for what has happened if the stewards take a hardline approach.

    Hamilton’s case is perhaps more likely. If the stewards deem that his car was in breach of the technical rules, then it is an automatic exclusion.

    In Verstappen’s case, the matter is much more subjective – as it will be down to the four stewards to make a call on how serious an offence they deem his actions to have been.

    For although his behaviour was innocuous, and is more likely to earn him a reprimand or fine, the fact that he did touch the exact part of the Mercedes that is under investigation, means the situation makes it far from straightforward.

    Mercedes could well argue that a simple touch from an outside party could be enough to have dislodged something and triggered the DRS rules breach – even if such a theory seems quite far fetched.
     
  22. ingegnere

    ingegnere F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Sep 12, 2004
    5,566
    Montreal
  23. DF1

    DF1 Three Time F1 World Champ

    Yes for Mercedes if they are deemed to be in violation

    No for Max but that depends on the Stewards. He could be or face a simple reprimand. No matter what Max picked the wrong time to be curious and leaves the door wide open for Mercedes to play this out strongly. Really poor headwork by Max.

    He knew what to look for and that says he knew RedBull were taking action. Very stupid to say the least.

    Now maybe the FIA will enforce the rule others seem to break about parc ferme and drivers not touching other cars. Well done Max LOL :)
     
  24. ingegnere

    ingegnere F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Sep 12, 2004
    5,566
    Montreal
    Autosport already amping up their defence of the Merc, and by association, HAM:

    “The wing will be the same design that the team has used all season, and there is nothing to suggest that it has deliberately gone about trying something new to exploit the DRS rules.

    One possibility is that something may have broken on the wing during qualifying, which has triggered the extra gap in the DRS.”

    Compare this to how they write about perceived infringements of other teams, including especially Ferrari.
     
    635CSI, crinoid, Bas and 1 other person like this.
  25. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Mar 24, 2008
    42,708
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas
    That must be world's luckiest break...that it breaks so it goes past the hard stops but still works perfectly fine...and goes unnoticed. Lol.

    I again repeat ricciardo penalty in Singapore 2019. 1ms spike triggered by a kerb on his slowest q1 lap and still excluded.
     
    ingegnere likes this.

Share This Page