I cant help it. this will be my last non-constructive comment: that is the ugliest ferrari I have ever seen. (apologies in advance to those who like it... I sincerely, wish I could like it)
I’ve spent the last hour or two looking at pretty much all the pics on Instagram and vids on Youtube, just to see if I’m missing anything. Trying to understand how something can be the most beautiful thing to one person and the ugliest thing to another. I found one pic where it starts going from butt ugly to ok. Perhaps there’s hope. *On a side note regarding my Cybertruck comment, I still admit it’s ugly and can understand if others do, but for me it went from ugly to cool ugly simply because it looks futuristic and it’s just a damn truck. I see Ferrari as an industry leader in making the most beautiful cars, although they also tend to have misses along the way. Image Unavailable, Please Login
i dont like the 296 i dont like the sf90 but, in spite of myself.....i like this SP3 Daytona. too bad i wont be able to buy one ......for a while
Is the ICONA3 named SP4? Testa Rossa SP4?Mille Miglia SP4?Le Mans SP4?IMOLA SP4?We should see it in 2024。
Definitely a red like the P4 (maybe Rosso corsa or magma), blue seats and gold (magnesium) wheels. [emoji851] Sent from my iPhone using FerrariChat
I think at this point there are enough pictures. My thoughts .. - The red one is a functional car, the white a show car - The official number in some release is 599 according to what I was told but not sure where - the lighting didn’t complement the cars and they need to be seen in sunlight - the matte white car is far better a color and well suited for the car - people last night either said they loved it or didn’t love it. No one I talked to came out and said they hated it - very busy car with lots of details - 2 people came out to take off the roof and when they did and walked away it looked very 308/328 roof style - Named Daytona because Ferrari wins at Daytona and SP3 as third Icona.
Something dark like a Pozzi Blue would look nice and hide some of the more, errrrr, surprising design decisions. Image Unavailable, Please Login
Interesting to read the many comments lamenting the result of Ferrari's reinterpretation of the P3/4 on a supercar chassis without the design talent of much loved work of Pininfarina. Of course the realization of that idea appeared 15 years ago, with a wonderful result. Im with the majority of comments on this thread. The car is dramatic, and likely much more so in person, but this revist of JG and AP's idea now by Ferrari alone lacks a coherent design. To my eyes there are too many touch points thrown together without clear design language. Sent from my iPhone using FerrariChat
it’s a striking and unique design - daring, aggressive and, viewed as a whole, spectacular. I think this will make the intended customers extremely happy (and rightfully so). The people on this forum declaring extreme negative opinions (especially without seeing it live) are amusing to me.
Not me! Not unless i can immediately flip for profit, to someone who finds it oh so "brave and daring"