The Purosangue Thread

I figured maybe bigger, but 23”?!! And they look small. That’s a big car!

I noted before that this car needs more sidewall on the tires or it will just look stupid—like riding on wagon wheels. And thicker spokes on the wheels.

Image Unavailable, Please Login

 

Front 22" and rear 23"..
There is a prototype seen many times with the 20" rims from the GTC4.. really weird.. tiny rims



Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login

 

another render

Tweet

— Twitter API (@user) date

 

This picture is currently being posted on Instagram. No clue about its origins.

Image Unavailable, Please Login

 

Goodness. Too much detail to be photoshop. Wheels are tiny...

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

 

Seems like someone’s going to loss either their job or an allocation, looks like the real deal, except those tiny wheels.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Hope it is just thus picture but that doesn’t look promising. Also this render should show the real car then…
Image Unavailable, Please Login

 

Yikes.

 

Front looks like pouty and flabby version of sf90. That extended nose piece is the real let down. Resembles Chinese cars design.

 

looks horrible...they took the worst design elements of the SF90 and made them even worse

 

Don’t rush as usual to judge a complex and very interesting project. Don't judge a possible beautiful car by a crooked and stolen photo!

 

Could also be a (well done) photoshop based on the drawings posted by Derek.

If it’s real… oh dear I don’t like it :/

 

This is my hope as well. I hope it's a really, really good render based on Derek's sketches. If it's the real deal then yikes..

 

Image Unavailable, Please Login

 

Really Ferrari? How lazy do you have to be?? SF90 front lights X Roma Bonnet X 296 rear....amazing! Did they fire all the designers based on the reschuffle on top and now just do a auto generated mix and match?

and they want how much for this? 500K..a joke

 

Where is this image from?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

IF that really is it I will pose the question ‘how is Manzoni still employed?’

...and a second question; the rumors were that this is the second FUV they designed as the first was scrapped, what did the first one look like?

 

Pretty vanilla design, unfortunately. How do people sneak photos like this? Aren’t you under a constant watchful eye from security when around a new unreleased model?

 

I think the new SUV looks great, remember it wills till be launched as V12 + good place for 4 people + 4 doors

 

The rear end looks really good.

From all the renders we saw I was quite concerned. This looks quite good actually.

Not sure I'd be very interested though, but that's largely because I don't really understand super sport SUV's. In Porsche's case especially (since they make 2 viable options), a Panamera ST Turbo S makes more sense than a Cayenne Turbo S, it's much lower to the ground so actually makes more sense to drive fast, whilst offering nearly as much space.

I do wish they simply kept making a GTC4Lusso replacement, but it's not an offensive car so to say. It'll probably sell like hot cakes.

 

I've been a staunch defender of Manzoni but these designs are so polarizing it may be time for new leadership.

 

Image Unavailable, Please Login

Is that it, yes?

 

It does seem that some of the recent good designs have been in spite of Manzoni.

 

I think that the rear looks quite good but don’t like the front. Also not the best colour for this car for sure.

 

agree the rear is not too bad, however it's just a plain copy of the 296 design rather a standalone design language, which is quite lazy ...ok if this would be a 250-300k car but for 500k one would expect more effort and individuality