F1 2022 - News/Regulation change/Developments | Page 16 | FerrariChat

F1 2022 - News/Regulation change/Developments

Discussion in 'F1' started by DF1, Sep 19, 2020.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. jgonzalesm6

    jgonzalesm6 Two Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Oct 31, 2016
    24,279
    Corpus Christi, Tx.
    Full Name:
    Joe R Gonzales
  2. 375+

    375+ F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 28, 2005
    13,648
    I like that Imola is back on the schedule.
     
    william, Bas and crinoid like this.
  3. Mitch Alsup

    Mitch Alsup F1 Veteran

    Nov 4, 2003
    9,721
    Imola has put on two pretty good races,
    Spain would be better not using the final chicane.

    They should make a special set of rules for Monaco:: something like 600 KG cars instead of the pork run at other tracks.
     
    Bas likes this.
  4. ingegnere

    ingegnere F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Sep 12, 2004
    5,566
    Montreal
    Just for Monaco—since they can’t race these F1 pigs—they should put all the drivers in spec F3 cars and let them race. For sure this would be a hundred times more exciting racing.
     
    kes7u, jpalmito, Bas and 1 other person like this.
  5. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Mar 24, 2008
    42,713
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas
    For added ****s and giggles, current F3 V6 car, with supercharger bolted on to it.
     
    375+ and 20000rpm like this.
  6. jgonzalesm6

    jgonzalesm6 Two Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Oct 31, 2016
    24,279
    Corpus Christi, Tx.
    Full Name:
    Joe R Gonzales
  7. DF1

    DF1 Three Time F1 World Champ

    https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/ferrari-has-cost-cap-concern-in-f1-2022-development-war/9421089/

    Ferrari has cost cap concern in F1 2022 development war
    Ferrari has urged to FIA to ensure that Formula 1’s budget cap is properly policed this year to prevent teams finding ways around the system for game changing upgrades.


    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    By: Jonathan Noble
    Mar 29, 2022, 4:07 AM
    Image Unavailable, Please Login


    With teams braced for a major development war as they bid to improve their new 2022 challengers, they are having to carefully judge their spending so they do not bust the $140 million spending limit for the season.

    However, with some squads facing up to the reality that the limit means they will not be able to bring all the upgrades they could, there are worries that some squads may try to find ways to exploit the financial regulations to help fund more development work.

    Ferrari team principal Mattia Binotto says that F1 needs to guarantee that no one can bust the budget cap limits, as that could prove decisive in the world championship battle.

    “[The budget cap] will influence the rate of development,” he said after seeing Charles Leclerc maintain his lead in the drivers’ standings after the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix.

    “I think that is a key element and my concern is that we need to make sure that we've got the right policing on that because it can be, let me say, a game changer in the fight for developments.”

    Speaking before the weekend, Red Bull team principal Christian Horner said teams were going to have to be far more strategic with their upgrade plans.

    “I think pretty much every team is pretty close to the limit this year,” he said. “It’s very aggressive so you have to be very strategic in how you apply your funds to developments.

    “I think rather than just running as fast as you can and getting as much performance from the car, you’ve got to be much more selective in what you chose, based on its cost. So it drives efficiency.”

    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Charles Leclerc, Ferrari F1-75, Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB18, battle for the lead

    Photo by: Zak Mauger / Motorsport Images

    Binotto’s comments come in the wake of similar remarks from F1 CEO Stefano Domenicali, who says that there are two concerns he has about the implementation of the budget cap in 2022.

    “The first is that of control, because if those who have to regulate miss something, the whole system collapses,” he said.

    “Today, it is not enough to check only the technical side, but a strict financial control is also needed, and for this reason the FIA is equipping itself to be even more robust in its role as guarantor.

    “The second point relates to some variables that were difficult to predict at the time of the launch of the financial regulations.

    “Inflation is going in an unforeseeable direction, and transportation costs have also gone up in recent weeks in a way that is difficult to predict.

    “There will be discussions to find the right solutions, but always keeping at the centre the principle that we must guarantee everyone the same possibilities.”
     
    20000rpm likes this.
  8. jgonzalesm6

    jgonzalesm6 Two Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Oct 31, 2016
    24,279
    Corpus Christi, Tx.
    Full Name:
    Joe R Gonzales
  9. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 3, 2006
    27,640
  10. jgonzalesm6

    jgonzalesm6 Two Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Oct 31, 2016
    24,279
    Corpus Christi, Tx.
    Full Name:
    Joe R Gonzales
    I'm gonna take a wild guess at this but--->to slow down the cars???

    (It doesn't say why)
     
  11. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 3, 2006
    27,640
    Yes, I guess you are right, although I didn't see the need for it.

    At the same time, Melbourne is removing one chicane, and I welcome that.

    I do not understand the fear for speed the FIA has.
     
    jpalmito, 20000rpm and jgonzalesm6 like this.
  12. 20000rpm

    20000rpm Karting

    Jan 3, 2022
    226
    Maybe to bring parity amongst the teams so that even if a car has higher speed, by slowing them down, it won't runaway from others, thereby preventing close racing. In the previous years, we have seen how one team's cars, under the influence of clean air, would run away from the rest of the pack with following drivers finishing a lap down from the winner.
    I don't think we would be seeing Charles-Max duel as intense as in the last two races if the circuits were drag-based.
     
  13. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Mar 24, 2008
    42,713
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas
    jgonzalesm6 likes this.
  14. DF1

    DF1 Three Time F1 World Champ

    According to journalist Joe Saward, Formula 1 could just be heading to Monaco for the last time in 2022. The Principality still does not have a contract for next year and there are said to be no talks about a new deal.


    Monaco may disappear
    In the Missed Apex Podcast Saward talks about the possibility that Monaco would not be on the calendar from 2023. "Which could happen. There is no contract for Monaco in Formula 1. Well there’s a contract this year. It could be the last Monaco,"Saward says.


    The previous deal that Monaco signed with Formula 1 dates back eleven years. At that time Bernie Ecclestone was still in power in Formula 1 and this deal he made possible. Ecclestone has not been an F1 boss for some time now since Liberty Media took over F1 in 2017.

    Saward continued by saying that Formula 1 is far from liking the annual visit of Monaco. In fact, Monaco has always been on the calendar for a relatively low price in contrast to other races. "Monaco has always had a cheap fee, because it thinks it’s more important than all the other races," Saward says.

    Expanding the calendar
    For now, it is not certain whether Monaco will actually disappear. What is certain is that in the latest Concorde Agreement, Formula 1 established that it may host 24 races per year. With the announcement of the Las Vegas GP and the return of China and Qatar in 2023, it means that races will drop out.
     
  15. DF1

    DF1 Three Time F1 World Champ

    https://www.gpblog.com/en/news/107621/gp-monaco-must-meet-the-same-commercial-conditions-as-everyone-else.html

    'GP Monaco must meet the same commercial conditions as everyone else'
    01-04-2022 18:45 | Updated: 01-04-2022 22:16

    by GPblog.com
    F1 NEWS
    Image Unavailable, Please Login




    Traditional Formula 1 races are under pressure. With increasing interest in Arab countries and the United States, where big money is paid to host a Grand Prix, more and more historic circuits are disappearing from the calendar. Even the Monaco Grand Prix is said to be in danger, but McLaren CEO Zak Brown believes the sport is "bigger than Monaco.





    Brown stresses that Monaco must move with the times, as he believes the Grand Prix is no longer essential to Formula One. By this he refers, among other things, to the lower rate that the organization pays in Monte Carlo, but also to the circuit itself. According to Brown, that has long been unsuitable for modern cars.



    Does Monaco need to modernise?
    Monaco has always been the 'glamorous' race on the F1 calendar, but with the arrival of venues like Miami, Las Vegas and Singapore, it is no longer the only one with that status, according to the McLaren boss. He therefore believes it is time for the circuit to make the necessary changes, both technical and commercial.


    "I think Monaco should meet the same commercial conditions as other Grands Prix," the American states according to MotorsportMagazine.com. "I'd rather have Monaco than not, but the sport is bigger than a single Grand Prix."

    The Monaco Grand Prix was first organized in 1929. In 1950, the race was held in the first season of the Formula One Championship. In 2020, due to the corona pandemic, the race was not run, the first time since 1955.
     
    william likes this.
  16. DF1

    DF1 Three Time F1 World Champ

    Nice pics!! :) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
     
    jgonzalesm6 likes this.
  17. DeSoto

    DeSoto F1 Veteran

    Nov 26, 2003
    7,792
    #394 DeSoto, Apr 2, 2022
    Last edited: Apr 2, 2022
    What a load of BS: of course Monaco is more important than other tracks.

    If someone wants to make a race in the middle of the desert to promote a country where nobody gives a **** about F1 it's fair that they have to pay more than those who have kept the show running since the first day.

    It's ironic that Zack Brown said that Monaco should pay like the rest: the team he runs gets an extra payment just because it's older than others.
     
    20000rpm, jpalmito and Bas like this.
  18. DF1

    DF1 Three Time F1 World Champ

    Dropping Monaco opens other venues so says F1. They have warned classic tracks are at risk. Dropping Monaco that pays little brings in revenue from others willing to pay!

    I don’t see an issue at all. They can still hold Classic race and no problem in Monaco. The world turns, adapts and moves on.
     
  19. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Mar 24, 2008
    42,713
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas
    100% correct!
     
    jpalmito likes this.
  20. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Mar 24, 2008
    42,713
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas
    Monaco is part of the triple crown. Simple as that. Dropping it would be enormously stupid. I know you hate the idea of the Monaco GP but it's a track that's been part of the calendar (minus one year due to corona), it's part of F1.

    Especially binning Monaco for another GP in the middle of some **** desert in a country no one cares about. Talk about stupidity.
     
    stavura, 20000rpm and jpalmito like this.
  21. 375+

    375+ F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 28, 2005
    13,648
    Whatever charm Monte Carlo had at one time is just about gone.
     
  22. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 3, 2006
    27,640

    Yes, a lot of investment, pity the cars don't fit the circuit anymore ! :cool:
     
  23. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 3, 2006
    27,640
    #400 william, Apr 2, 2022
    Last edited: Apr 2, 2022
    More important it could be; I am not going to argue about that.

    If Monaco is so important to F1, why do they keep writting technical rules that completely ignores this circuit?

    Formulae have been allowed to develop over decades ignoring the tight environment of Monaco.

    It seems that we discover that problem every year, and the FIA does nothing about it.

    2022 was an other occasion to address the issue, but the FIA missed it again.
     

Share This Page