Classiche in 2008 but non-OEM exhaust. And it's a driver! https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1990-ferrari-f40/ Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
nice car. well maintained by some good names. perfect driver. should reach/exceed $2 mil since there is only a small comm to pay.
You had to post that on BaT, didn't you? Some people are in the market for one of these... [emoji16] Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
Looks like Bill Noon (Symbolic out in San Diego) is putting the next one up on BaT. This has a fraction of the miles. Probably something bidders of the current auction don't realize. Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
I'm kidding, really. If there are people ready to put $2M down on a 46k km F40, BaT will bring it out. Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
i think it might. the one that brought $2.45 had 9k miles. the one that brought $2.1 recently had more i think . and both of those had to pay at least 10% - maybe 15%- in commission. so if you dial it back that means $200-250k off the top. so lets say this car is 'only' worth $1.8 mil at a regular auction, then that would still end up being $2 mil for the buyer to get it into his driveway. or i could be completely wrong
Many more of these cars trade hands on the private market though, so the auctions are not entirely accurate. I was offered an 11km '91 at $2.4 recently. It sold for somewhere between $2.3 to 2.4. But it feels like BaT bidders have no care for the overall market and bid with their emotions. I am very curious as to where this goes. No matter what I'd say these are still recession-proof cars, so they will be well-bought for the most part. Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
The very large majority of Ferraris and other cars change hands privately and you and I will never ever hear/learn about it, especially not about the prices paid. Public auctions cover not more than 25 to 30 percent, I guess. Which means that in most cases only very very few people actually get valuable information. Auctions alone are not representative, not at all. Marcel Massini
Why is that? I’d think putting the car up for auction with a world wide marketing campaign would bring way more money? No? I guess no way to really know for sure but if I were to sell a $20 million plus car it would be marketed worldwide then sold at auction Sent from my iPhone using FerrariChat
The 1991 F40 which brought $2,425,000 had 3,779 miles. The 1989 F40 which brought €2,102,400 had 8,245 miles. True. Perfectly stated and correct 100%. The Private Treaty market is more prolific for the simple reason that many people like privacy, I also think the representative numbers are a pure market indicator because Private Treaty deal only closes if Buyer & Seller have taken time to do due diligence and are both happy with the number absent of external pressures or competing interests. Most of our business is Private Treaty and can't be discussed publicly. Agreed if you have a Mc Laren F1 or a Le Mans race-winning car for example, but F40s are not $20 million cars, we've sold @ 70 of them via Private Treaty, it works, but auction is just fine too, different venues for different folks.
this is what i was referring to https://www.mecum.com/lots/FL0122-487832/1992-ferrari-f40/ 8732 miles
No, not at all. A $ 20 million plus car might be good to create headlines for an auction company but not necessarily beneficial for the consignor/owner. F40's aren't 20 M $ yet. A $20 million plus car is best to sell strictly private, all you need is the right contacts and potential buyers. On top of that, the 10% consignor fee and 10% buyer's commission, total of 20%, doesn't need to be calculated in. Everybody wins (except the auction company). Twenty percent of 20 million is a ton of money. Marcel Massini
dont realize or dont care? looks like 17k km on this one. the price vs mileage equation is getting blurry. just from memory, you have mileage ranging from 2k to 26k, and prices so far not necessarily tracking that ratably. it would be interesting to see some sort of comparison of all cars sold in the last 18 months vs mileage. assuming all other things being equal (which is admittedly a huge assumption i know, but just trying to figure out if mileage is still as significant).
This 1992 F40 did not bring the $2.45m figure you mentioned in your post above, the published result for Mecum's Lot 150 in it's Kissimmee sale was $2.75m, widely regarded to be an outlier based on subsequent auction and Private Treaty results. This should help https://www.classic.com/m/ferrari/f40/ although as pointed out it does not cover all the Private Treaty sales that have occurred in the same period.
thanks for that this is probably a more relevant time frame for discussion: https://www.classic.com/m/ferrari/f40?interval=1y but if we discard the top sale, we must also discard the low sale, they either both count, or neither. which then skews these numbers from classic.com up again
94528,s $2,750,000 isn't the top result, and although it's result was considered an outlier by everyone in the trade became of circumstances I won't post here, it's result should be included in F40's market data for completeness sake, the same is true of all high or low results, we can't make up new inclusion rules as we go along and discard any sales, otherwise the data is incomplete. An outlier result is simply a result believed to be an anomaly because of certain circumstances, but it's worth considering along with all the others, so I'm certainly not advocating it be discarded. Incidentally the top result of $2,892,500 is actually the sale of the ex-Don Weber 2,345 miles USA F40 93518, FWIW I inspected this car very carefully prior to it's Gooding Pebble Beach auction and we passed on it, all I'll say is that I was stunned it brought anywhere near that number as the car was far from pristine, my client ended up buying another similar-miles USA F40 for almost $400,000 (!) less, which demonstrates that you really have to know this market otherwise you will overpay. With that in mind, recorded sales data is open to interpretation, mileage, condition, records, owners, original paint & interior, modifications, USA or Eu are all factors, and along those lines some results in the accumulated data have merit and are very deserved, others are simply the result of too much money in the system with people paying top dollar for cars that will require significant refurbishment. Therefore, just because a car brings xyz does not mean said car was an astute purchase. Interestingly, overpaying for cars this usually happens with auction cars in an up market as opposed to Private Treaty cars, perhaps the reason some sellers prefer to bring cars to auction. A much more prudent way for a buyer to review the sales data of any asset (including Ferrari Supercars) is to analyze the results over a 5 year period, with sales in the last 3 years giving you an true indication of if the market has stayed the same, moved steadily, or moved suddenly, this way if you are sensing it's the top of the market you can make an informed decision as regards the timing of your purchase. Naturally, in a market where the cars have moved upwards, sellers or people holding F40s want you to look at just the most recent results which reflect the current status quo. Ultimately all that matters is today's market, but buyers are advised to take into consideration past year's performance as it's an indicator of future results and where we could be if the market slows down. In the 30 years since the cars were being produced, as with any market, F40s have gone up & down in value, the same holds true for the future.
Agreed Marcel. I think it is important to emphasize that buyers of $!m+ cars are likely to be accomplished at due diligence or have the contacts to access someone who can do it for them, well.
No factory F40s were rhd, any such were post production conversions by Pininfarina. I see nothing on the order form for the car to be euro rather than UK spec.
My memory was that MPH speedometers were the preferred request for UK cars but some simply arrived with a KM one fitted because of supply shortages at certain times.
So an update for the Fchat brethren. Looked into the car, as it was marketed very nicely. Some of you may have seen my early comments on the BaT listing but I stopped posting after I decided to bail on the car. I didn't want to poison the well there. But my issues (with a strong assist from Ryan): 1) rust on the front control arms. Seller said it was oxidation seen on most UK cars. Made me wonder where there was rust that wasn't visible. 2) weave on the underside of the hood/bonnet looked unusually irregular. They said it was normal. I have looked at that area on multiple other cars (some for sale right now) and it looked much more uniform on all other cars. Made me wonder if there was some type of (minor) frontal impact that was repaired. 3) service history was great. Noticed that it ended up having a top down rebuild. Service history had registration numbers on them. Looking at Instagram and Youtube, found videos of said car with smoke coming out the exhaust as it took off from a stoplight. 4) listing is by a marketing company called Wob Cars. Initial listing said it was a private party selling the car. BaT themselves actually updated the listing after 3-4 days stating it was actually a dealer in Pennsylvania selling the car. When asked, Wob said it was a typo on the original listing. Made me wonder why Wob didn't update the listing themselves and why BaT specifically posted in the comments that they themselves updated it. 5) I contacted Wob (nothing on their website -- had to find their contact info on Facebook - called their number and emailed) to see if I could get the car inspected. I asked where the car was - LA (where Wob is) or Pennsylvania (dealer). Took them a few days to respond and they said it was in LA. At that point it didn't seem that they were as responsive as a seller selling a $1.6M+ car (bid at that time, not sure if it changed) so I bailed. Is this a good deal at $1.6M or $1.7M? Probably, and then you can add more miles without worry for value and probably have another $100k for repairs, etc. Cars with less than 10k miles are worth at least $2.1+ but then it's more dependent on mileage (for the next few years, at least). Is it worth $2M? No way. There are much better cars out there right now. MUCH better. The BaT comments don't seem to be from people who are serious about the car. It's all the F40 fauning. I'm assuming the serious buyers are just doing their due diligence and are going to bid on Thursday. I hope the winner gets it right. In the end, it's still an F40. Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk