The (one and only) '0846' Debate Thread

If you’re talking about Steve, you’re off base. He is over the top, but how many of have been threatened with a lawsuit for expressing your opinion?


Sent from my iPhone using FerrariChat.com mobile app

 

Yep. Totally ridiculous.

 

To legitimise any of the above, simply list the post number/s on this thread where your claims can be proven..........

 

I don’t have time nor much interest, but if you do and wish to find them, I recommend looking into relevant replies and if using critical thinking, it might become clear.
Some, like the employment seeking reference bids are likely gone as they were part of the posters avatar information at one time or another.
As I’ve stated before, only thing accomplished by the antagonist & his fanboi club was that someone else with far more interesting stuff to offer is no longer contributing here.

 

You don’t have much time or interest aside from making ******** posts casting aspersions about one user with no supportive documentation while simultaneously defending a guy who’s essentially perpetuating fraudulent ownership of a famous/priceless lost car and left in a huff when he got called out for it. Got it.

 

Just another blow hard then making accusations you cannot even back up.

A very clear case of the pot calling the kettle black

 

is this a special idiom?
when I translate to german it makes no sense
could you explain please for me unknown what this supposed to mean?

 

It means it is a bit rich or a bit cheeky if someone ('the pot') calls another ('the kettle') black (or dirty), when they are both on the same stove and probably just as dirty ('black') as each other.

 

Out of the frying pan and into the fire.

 

thank you for explanation

 

turbo joe there is a lot of this > Schadenfreude, here to...

 

Since I will not read this "War and Peace", could someone spoil the book, by telling me when the huff and puff happened?

Of course, I don't want anyone searching on my behalf, only if you have the post #
No big deal, only curious. It might even be funny
Thank you!

Regards, Alberto

 

Jim's username was Napolis. If you want to see how he left it's easy, just go into his profile and look for his last few posts.

 

Thank you Mario! I know Jim is Napolis, never thought of looking it up that way. So clever

Regards, Alberto

PS. I just did, found around 30K posts, but I cannot figure out how to find the "Titanic".

 

Once again: The Ferrari factory never sold 0846. A Ferrari P3/P4 with #0846 does not exist anymore. (unless F wants to resurrect that particular car)
David Piper never owned, raced or sold a P3/P4 using the serial number 0846.

Finito e basta

 

Please post one example, to back up your accusation (in bold, above) against another poster. You made the accusation, please back it up.

 

I imagine if Napolis wanted, and he threw enough money at the Co. he could get his car certified. But, he seems not to care. He has some impressive cars and he enjoys them.

Perry

 

"Ein Esel schimpft den Anderen Langohr" würde mein Grossmutter gesagt haben.
En Français "C'est l'Hôpital qui se moque de la Charité"
Gruss aus Lothringen.

Rgds

 

I cannot tell if you are one "those people" that believes that this car is actually the real P3/4 or not. If that is so, then you have clearly given up all comprehension skills of the documentation that has been presented here and must not know any of the ranking experts around the world who have been aware of the falsehood for a very long time.

If your issue is about Steve, instead of denigrating him you should be praising him for the detailed efforts he did to demonstrate the misrepresentations. You need to give some credence to what was going away from Ferrari Chat that influenced some of the attitudes. This has been pointed out before that there was nastiness going on that went unseen here.

If your issue is about Ferrari Chat losing someone with a great collection of interesting cars then I can feel for that. But it was his own choice and driven by an inability to accept what he knew were the facts. No story excuses with the other cars but with this one that did not apply.

 

In the past there were people that were part of the international experts retained by Classiche that would have refused to grant this car certification.

 

Regarding the mountain of evidence that now points away from this replica being "authentic": it seems a few people would rather attack the person presenting the evidence, rather than look-at/understand the evidence itself.

Sad.

 

True I suppose, but , you know, money talks.

Perry

 

Let's call it an authentic really original, replica wannabee, perhaps, if you maybe, possibly, want it to be
whatever you want. Just click your heels a la Judy.
Maybe BaT could accept to post in at "no reserve". They are always right, no?

I don't see Napolis losing any sleep over it. Why should we, about who's right or wrong?
Do I get a prize if I am right/wrong?

Is my "non original, 212 Toolkit", made by Bob Smith, an original? Yes, made by Bob Smith, originally.
You really have to have an original next to it to tell if it is or not.

Was it made by Ferrari? No, if you insist, and own a metals composition analyzer. Yes, if you don't.

What a silly world ...

Regards, Alberto

P.S. Anybody ever started a thread about the PF Dino prototype? Real? Not?
That would be refreshing

 

No, let's call it what it is. A fake. Like many contributing to this thread over the years, you don't have a clue.

 

Ferrari would not certify this fake for any money. You're right, he doesn't care that he is attempting to distort Ferrari history.