Nowhere in the entire article was Hamilton mentioned or Rosberg entertaining the idea he was afraid to race him specifically.
He said he was afraid he couldn't perform, he was team mates with Hamilton. Simply add 1 + 2. And you talk about me having trouble comprehending.
Seems far more likely to have self doubt which is a battle most people have. But you chose to write a headline based off of words he didn't say in any way so it can fit your narrative. Like I said, you should be a reporter. We see that trashy journalism to get views all the time, and it works.
You say it is based off of self doubt, its ok for you to interpret it how you want. I'll stick with him being afraid to race Hamilton again.
You asked, so I said how it sounds like to me. The article doesn't even mention Lewis Hamilton's name, and yet you post a headline to a link and say Rosberg says he is scared of Lewis. He did not say that, at all. There is a difference between stating an opinion and claiming someone said something that they didnt.
Correct. It sounds like Rosberg was afraid to me. Here is Rosberg saying talking about the dificulty of beating Hamilton. https://thesportsrush.com/f1-news-its-so-difficult-to-beat-him-nico-rosberg-still-thinks-lewis-hamilton-is-going-to-win-2021-championship/ Seems to me he absolutely didn't want to experience that again.
This is actually incredible. You link an article, completely make a whole narrative up from it, when pointed out how desperately wrong you are you accuse others of being haters. Definition of trolling.
Speaking to Men's Health magazine, he said he was, "afraid that at some point I wouldn't be good enough and that no team would want me anymore. I wanted to decide [on an exit] for myself.”
They were already haters before the article came out. My narrative is that he was afraid to face Hamilton. I am right in my narrative bro. I don't care what you think about my narrative. By the way are you trolling when you constantly throw insults at me?
Ah, the duality of ktu: Calling people haters and then accusing others of name calling. Cool hypocrisy, bro.
Kind of like the duality of haters. Whining all the time about Hamilton whining, then call Hamilton a whiner.
The hatred for those unwilling to embrace Hamilton as the second coming runs deep in this thread. And the irony is sadly lost ... I'm sure the response (by those on ignore) will be something like "I know you are but what am I"
Aaaaaaand...you have to admire the guy for that: intelligent, clever, well educated (has a degree in engineering if my memory - which is really declining - etc...) speaks four languages, and whatever...and knows when it is time to call it quits...and he beats the supposed "GOAT", or whatever name you use...a full all-rounder, a complete human being. (Disclaimer: I have to admit I liked his Dad's driving and personality a lot, too...O.K: and furthermore: Nico was born in Wiesbaden, and that is not very far from my birthplace also) There is that saying in English "Jack of all trades, master of none", but Nico is the great all-rounder: the proof of the pudding is in eating it, and he ate it. Kudos to him, really: nobody could take what he did away from him. Besides, after he left the team, "those in charge" felt more astute to hire a subservent team-mate, which, actually, says everything. Hope you're "living the good life", Nico, 'cause you deserve it. Rgds
+1 Not to mention being a contributor/anchor to the F1 paddock and grid. He goes "against the grain" and not biased like most of them PLUS he has the "current" expertise to back it up.
