isot, one more question: there are, in any part of the car, those 3 elements (vents) as there are behind the side window of the F12tdf, on top of the wheels of the recent leaked SF90 LM, as there are in several parts of the 275 GTB/C Speciale , or even on the 550/575M (behind the front wheels, but 2 instead of 3 vents). In my opinion, this type of element is very beautiful and classic. Can you tell if there is in the design of the F167? If you can, you don't even need to say which part of the bodywork, just if there is.
Hm, but you didn't say anything about the “365 GTB/4 Daytona-front look“ though... Anyway, I'm totally relaxed because the time for the first leaked pics is approaching... I'm still amused by the leaked Purosangue pics months before the presentation. In this case, you can always count on Ferrari: There will always be someone with a smartphone looking for quick fame and this is our real moment here in the chat...
I have no info about this detail. I can imagine they will have found for sure an iconic sign or element also for this car. With the Monza or the Roma the characteristic is the absence of these elements: harmonious shapes generated from a circle or a single hard line
So for the ones who are in the know, How much deviation from the 812’s design, does it follow the design of the purosangue re front rend, and will we see a trick suspension from multimatic? Yes I’m fishing. A little fish would be appreciated.
The F167 812 Replacement - Here’s What We Know: 1. Normally Aspirated V12. No hybrid. No hybrid warning stickers on mules 2. Yes, 75% or higher probability it incorporates revolutionary Multimatic Suspension. 3. Very different design direction versus 812. 4. If you DID NOT like the 812 styling, you are the type of person who YES WILL LIKE THE F167. 5. Car is gorgeous especially from the rear. High likelihood of near universal acclaim. EVERY front engine V12 Ferrari fan will want to buy it. In fact, likely will want to sell 812 upon release and rush down to dealer to place deposit on F167. 6. Rear features some INNOVATIVE NEW elements which are a modern reinterpretation inspired by a historic car, exactly which one and how this translates to the design is not yet discernible. 7. 80% likelihood of Yes to front styling being cleaner, more modern, More like Purosangue, less of the big basking shark mouth. 8. Overall likely a luscious beautiful yet modern muscular ‘Roma on Steroids’ but with its own unique identity and design elements and something very special happening at the rear. A stunningly beautiful car by all accounts.
The front end is going to reference the Daytona with a feature between the headlights as in a plexiglass Daytona. I said this several pages ago. But nobody listens to little ole me. Image Unavailable, Please Login
Me yes! And this will be the front! I’m expect a black bridge between the headlights and I imagine also a sort of low-relief belt that runs in the middle of the car, perhaps even drowning the door opening handle
You can see here how the headlights are more horizontal whereas in prior models they have been vertical. The headlights even appear to wrap around the sides a bit, sort of like? Oh a DAYTONA! Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
I think the Bonnet will have the 365 Daytona Vents however closer to the centre and slightly more to the front than the original. The bonnet will have a raised section in the middle sort 250 GTO ish but longer and extending down closer to the front. The lights will have a feel of the 365 Daytona but have a lot more of a modern take, I feel if they are too close in looks to the original, they will date the look. The wheel arches will have a nice deeper curve down onto the bonnet.
From this Image Unavailable, Please Login To this Image Unavailable, Please Login It was not a serious attempt
Initially, it was for the end of 2023, then it became the beginning of 2024. I think that 2024 is a mistake because you shouldn't mix two presentations as important as 167 and 250 the same year...in my opinion
Thanks for answering. But I don't understand, did you mean that "there is no such detail" in the F167, or simply that you can't talk about design elements at this time?
