Care to share any names? Otherwise, this is just rumor and hearsay ... perhaps true, but equally likely to be fabricated out of thin air.
Why would anyone blow the cover of someone who works for one of the teams, and give his name on FChat just to please you ?
I did hear Martin Brundle say, this morning, that of all the drivers on the grid ... Max is the one he'd like to share a beer with Martin surely didn't say that to gain any popularity with the British press, and i'm guessing that Martin also knows one or two "true insiders within F1"
Just to please me ... LOL you really don't get it. If I were to write that "true insiders within F1" tell ME that your hero Hamilton wears women's panties and watches kiddie porn ... but of course i can't divulge my sources ... would you believe me?
I questioned the “ Max is cocky’” post and you have to bring up Hamilton…you’re obsessed and it’s not healthy.
First, Hamilton isn't my hero. BUt if he "wears women's panties and watches kiddie porn", that's not my problem. He has been slandered for years, so one more accusation won't make a difference. I don't believe most of what people say or print. This is a forum, you don't have to believe anything said here. A forum is for entertainment, it's not a court of law. No one here took the oath to tell the truth, so you can calm down. You can accept what people say, or doubt their word; it's not that important. Years ago, when I lived in Bexleyheath, I had a neighbour working at McLaren in the composite department who passed on some insights about drivers transfert for the following year. I put that on FC, and a w****** challenged me to name my informer. Would I do that? Like hell I would !!! You take my word for it, or you take a hike !!! Same for Terra, who gave some info from insiders. Why would he reveal his sources, and maybe fall out with them just to satisfy you? You believe what Terra says, or you don't. Period !
^^^ And that's the internet, in one easy lesson... What one reads IS the truth. OR What one reads has ZERO truth in it. Whichever answer suits one's agenda is what one runs with. Actually rather pitiful.
Remind me again what thread we're in? There's a better argument to be made that discussions of Max's cockiness are off topic.
Oh my bad ... i brought up Hamilton, in a thread about HAMILTON!! It's literally hard to even imagine the mental gymnastics that the faithful will do, to defend their idol
Still struggling, I see ... It's not a matter of "whose problem it is". Sure, anyone can write whatever they want on an internet forum. Just like, anyone can ask for sources when character attacks are made by alleged, nameless "insiders". An accusation is made, and I asked for sources ... that's all. Why attack the person asking for the sources, in post after post? You'll believe what you will, apparently, with no proof or foundation whatsoever. Why even comment, then, when someone asks for sources? You seem more offended by the request for sources, than you do about the original character attack. Isn't that strange?
It really is entertaining "anonymous" accusations against Verstappen aren't even questioned, in a Hamilton thread. But if you dare mention Hamilton ... in the Hamilton thread ... you're labeled "obsessed" It simply staggers the imagination ... how blind the faithful.
The subject went to Max's character and people were on THAT subject. Several people (you and me included) basically said "put up or shutup" on the "Max is cocky" accusation. Lewis wasn't in the conversation and there was no reason for him to be in this little "Max" sidebar of the Hamilton hate fest...until you brought him up. Sorry your confused.
Hmm I'm not so sure on that. If he wears women panties if anything it'll be pretty funny but no one would care. the latter bit, um I'm pretty sure 99% of the people would actually care. Not that it's true mind you.
People feed on baseless gossips if it suit their agenda, and help to spread rumours. Really only a condemnation by a court should be taken into consideration; the rest is just tittle-tattle.
