Clutch wear calculation on a (pre-OTO) 612...what is the correct clutch disk thickness? | FerrariChat

Clutch wear calculation on a (pre-OTO) 612...what is the correct clutch disk thickness?

Discussion in 'Technical Q&A' started by Chindit, Jul 9, 2023.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Chindit

    Chindit Formula Junior
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Oct 18, 2008
    383
    Navarre, Florida
    Full Name:
    Nick P.
    Hello Gents. I have had some trouble finding the correct answer on this and was hoping somebody here might be able to help. I'm familiar with the formula "Clutch closed position" minus "clutch closed position from new" divided by "clutch thickness" multiplied by 100...and so on... but I have not been able to find a good reference for the value to use as "clutch thickness" for my 2006 pre-OTO 612. I have measured a brand new clutch disk to be ~8.5mm, but it would seem odd to use that number in the clutch wear calculation since you cannot physically wear the clutch to "zero" thickness (you could never reach a "100% worn" condition). But I might not fully understand the topic. Please help if you can. Thank you.
     
  2. tazandjan

    tazandjan Three Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Jul 19, 2008
    39,164
    Clarksville, Tennessee
    Full Name:
    Terry H Phillips
    The 512 TR, 456, 456M, 550, 575M and pre-OTO 612 all use the same clutch. Unloaded thickness new is 8.35 mm + .05 mm and loaded thickness is 7.7 mm + 0.3 mm.
     
  3. Chindit

    Chindit Formula Junior
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Oct 18, 2008
    383
    Navarre, Florida
    Full Name:
    Nick P.
    Thank you for that info, Taz. I have never seen a reference for a "loaded" thickness of a clutch disk. Does that indicate that the friction material is compressible and that overall clutch disk thickness will change (reduced from 8.35mm to 7.7mm) when the pressure plate is closed? Which number would be correct to use as "clutch thickness" in the standard clutch wear formula?

    Is there a specified thickness tolerance for the clutch disk? If I measured a used clutch disk with a micrometer, what would the minimum thickness be before it is no longer serviceable?

    Ultimately, I would like to gauge clutch disk wear by comparing "clutch closed position from new" with the auto-calculated "clutch closed position". That is to say...estimated clutch disk thickness via reference to thrust bearing travel. I'm not so much interested in a "% worn", I'd prefer an actual measurement. Is that even possible? I realize that the diaphragm spring has a certain lever-arm gearing value (I've seen a post here that estimated 4:1) and that thrust bearing travel measurement does not directly correlate to pressure plate movement. Thanks for entertaining these odd questions.
     
  4. tazandjan

    tazandjan Three Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Jul 19, 2008
    39,164
    Clarksville, Tennessee
    Full Name:
    Terry H Phillips
    Why not just see directly how worn the clutch is through one of the access ports? I think I did a post on that in the 599/612 forum plagiarizing Brian Crall. The calculations are not that accurate.
     
    tbakowsky likes this.
  5. Chindit

    Chindit Formula Junior
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Oct 18, 2008
    383
    Navarre, Florida
    Full Name:
    Nick P.
    Good point. I have inspected my clutch disk through the inspection ports, and have viewed the t/o bearing position with my boroscope and everything looks to be in great shape. No problems there. But the whole F1 system operation and clutch wear question seems to be a mystery to a lot of owners, and it would be nice to have some hard data to work with. As you said, the "wear percentage" numbers can be all over the map. I would think a hard number such as "when (self-calibrated) clutch closed position reaches "x", then your clutch disk has reached its physical wear limit." That would seem useful to owners. Of course, this is a moot point if the "clutch closed position from new" number has been incorrectly set or purposely manipulated.
     
  6. Chindit

    Chindit Formula Junior
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Oct 18, 2008
    383
    Navarre, Florida
    Full Name:
    Nick P.
    I forgot to add: I feel like I understand the theory of operation very well. I have Aldous and others to thank for that. But what I'm missing is an official number to use for clutch thickness when running the clutch wear equation. Those numbers seem available for the 360 (8.5mm), 430 (5.6mm) and Maserati Cambiocorsa (5.6mm, as published in the official Maserati training manual). But I have not been able to find reference to the correct number for the 612. Or for the 575 for that matter. So is it 8.35mm, 7.7mm,...or something else entirely? Does anybody here know? Thank you.
     
  7. windsock

    windsock Formula 3
    Rossa Subscribed

    Nov 29, 2006
    1,151

    The new clutch number entered into the TCU is not obtained from the clutch disc. It is obtained from the clutch position sensor after it is installed.
    Early 612 with single plate clutch should read 19-20mm in 2005, 16.2-17.2 2006-2008. If you are surfacing the flywheel that number may be a little smaller.
    The number you see in parameters, current clutch position, is what you will enter into the clutch configuration. If properly done it is pretty accurate at about 20% per mm of wear. You will get shifting issues at about 5mm of wear from the new clutch position. Also go in and clear the clutch wear degree which has nothing to do with the wear % but is a clutch abuse calculation.
    Model PIS (mm) New Clutch (mm)
    F131 4.5‐5.5 14.2‐14.8
    F131 Challenge 3.9‐4.2 14.2‐14.8
    F131 Stradale 4.2 14.2‐14.8
    F133E 7.5‐8.2 16.5‐18.0
    F140 5.9‐6.4 16.5
    F137 MY05 7.6 19.5‐20.6
    F137 MY06‐MY08
    Single Plate Clutch
    6.53 16.2‐17.2
    F137 MY08 One
    To One (OTO)
    Dual Plate Clutch
    4.6‐4.9 19.2‐19.8
    F141 4.61 19.6‐20.6
    F131E 4.3‐5.3 19.0‐21.0
    F131EV08 3.93 16.5‐17.0
    F131ELP Scuderia 3.5‐3.8 16.1‐16.6

    These are numbers we typically see some variation especially with aftermarket clutches or resurfaced flywheel is to be expected.
     
  8. windsock

    windsock Formula 3
    Rossa Subscribed

    Nov 29, 2006
    1,151

    Wear numbers are all over the map because many do not understand how the system works and many think that changing the new clutch number does something to the operation to resolve issues or make it perform better. It does not it only indicates the start position of the clutch. Checking the new clutch number with expected and what is current is something we always do during service rather then just look at wear. Often we find a car with 25% wear but the clutch numbers have been manipulated and its actually much more.
     
  9. Chindit

    Chindit Formula Junior
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Oct 18, 2008
    383
    Navarre, Florida
    Full Name:
    Nick P.
    That is really great info. Thank you, Mark, for taking the time to respond.
     
  10. tbakowsky

    tbakowsky F1 World Champ
    Consultant Professional Ferrari Technician

    Sep 18, 2002
    19,948
    The Cold North
    Full Name:
    Tom
    With more scan tools out there able to set and adjust clutch wear, we are seeing an increased amount of cars coming in for PPI inspections with fudged clutch configurations. Be careful..
     
    windsock and Chindit like this.
  11. tazandjan

    tazandjan Three Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Jul 19, 2008
    39,164
    Clarksville, Tennessee
    Full Name:
    Terry H Phillips
    Yup, sometimes it is like a dog watching TV. Something is going on, just not real sure what it is.
     

Share This Page