It was in the news again very recently, about Ferrari striking it from their records, just goes to show, never believe the internet hope the real one has not been removed as a result. I probably read it in the same place you read that USA F40s had a unique engine Joseph or that Ferrari only made 399 Enzo's. https://www.hotcars.com/ferrari-f40-lm-barchetta-doesnt-exists/
Does anybody have the March 2005 Artcurial catalog for when they tried to sell the Blaton 'F40'? I'm interested to see how they describe it.
Tom had already corrected your erroneous assertion about 79890 so my question was obviously a rhetorical one, regardless, thanks for confirming your source.
Always a pleasure to allow you to keep digging that hole. Also thank you to those that have contacted me directly with far more detailed current information, I fully understand why some of you do not actively participate on here. I agree by the way, that publication you guys mentioned really is just a coffee table comic.
It would be both easier to simply confess you were wrong, again. Nobody here really cares about the yellow Barchetta because it's not a real Ferrari as Tom has already pointed out, it’s certainly not 79890 as you wrongly proclaimed based solely on an internet story. If certain people do not wish to be active on here, that's their prerogative, nobody's losing any sleep over it, meanwhile anyone who is willing to both share and learn has no problem participating. As regards publications, if you are referring to mine, as can be proven, they were well-reviewed and successfully sold out in several editions, not a rhetorical question this time, what publication have you ever published? Now let's review your latest round of gibberish: First you gleefully announce complete with smiley face that 79890 the famed IMSA F40 LM that is known to be alive and well became "the yellow convertible". https://www.ferrarichat.com/forum/posts/149426817/ Next Tom comes on and soundly refutes your completely erroneous claim by giving you a basic lesson in Ferrari reality, the difference between a real Ferrari and a Replica, something you seem to struggle with - but we'll get to more of that later. https://www.ferrarichat.com/forum/posts/149426838/ Next, with obvious good humor I asked you if in fact fact you learned your erroneous assertion on Facebook, a fair question IMO because, you've let us known multiple times that it and the internet at large are your main source of F40 material. Next, instead of simply admitting you were wrong yet again and stand corrected, in a desperate attempt to save face, you blather on about your internet source and other off-topic items in a pointless post you made, and then, insecure about your post, returned to edit it 13 minutes later. None of this changes the fact that your only connection to real F40s is from the Internet. https://www.ferrarichat.com/forum/posts/149427472/ Next I let you down easy by politely thanking you for confirming that the source of your erroneous information was the internet - you should have left it at that, I was going to give you a pass. Next, unable to walk away because you’re embarrassed by being schooled on basic F40 history, you return again to make a completely unnecessary rambling post containing no facts, which, yet again unsatisfied with, you return to edit 20 minutes later. If ever there was a display of insecurity and a misguided agenda, yours' is embedded here for posterity. We get that you can't tell the difference between a CGI (computer generated image) and a real one of a 288 GTO & F40, but it's hardly surprising given how much you rely on the internet for your assertions. However, the fact is, this F40 Prototype thread is about F40s with actual Ferrari serial numbers, not fakes, copies or replicas built in a shed - that basic difference appears lost on you. The good news is, there remains plenty of useful technical, historical and image content of real F40s here for you to learn from. Here's a real F40 Prototype in the early days at Michelotto, no CGI. Of note, no mirrors, 5 rear fender slats, Pininfarina badge below the belt line, Ozzeta wheels (not Speedlines) with smooth star spokes, and black anodized center bolts. Image Unavailable, Please Login
This period image of the interior of this Prototype also has no typical green caulking used and it also has a different weave for the composite/kevlar. It features some differences to the car assigned 80697, for example the transmission tunnel is not covered by fabric, the shift knob is standard, and the fusebox is exposed. Image Unavailable, Please Login
Exterior of the same car, in period do we know what chassis number this is? Image Unavailable, Please Login
You been spending all week writing that up Joseph? Every man and his dog on here can read what I simply wrote, Tom listed the VIN for the pic of the car I posted prior, and I then noted it was the same as the VIN quoted for the yellow F40 Barchetta, that is all. Its called chat, amongst enthusiasts online, just sharing information, and not using Fchat purely for self promotion like yourself. Tom graciously then updated the information that said VIN was still firmly affixed to the original car, and not the claims for the yellow example, where no other open source till that time had verified such. I even now know the name of the current owner of said LM and where it is located, given you are clearly relying on Toms post, do you? You need to seek help for this constant desire on here to multi quote my threads to boost your ego, only to keep failing with just pure bluff and bravado.
80697 car had several updates/changes throughout it's prototype life and has been restored a couple of years ago. From no F40 embossed logo to a rear clip with logo etc (ALL IN PERIOD) and NO: not a production F40 that was converted to prototype chassis et all!
But Tom, how can a car with a production VIN from 1990 be an original prototype?. No one yet seems to have answered your info regarding this car from some time ago! Have you got to see it now? Before you know who pipes up yet again with another vain attempt to disparage me, Tom and I have chatted about this example directly in the past, Tom certainly knows his stuff
someone can not rely only on Ferrari factory information (=Maranello). The so called "experts" (whoever they may be) need to check/inspect the car and ask the builders of the prototypes... Too much black-and-white thinking imho by some. The real truth is out there (most to be found in the Veneto region)
You can spin it how you like, you were completely wrong about 79890. Since you seem concerned about my responses to your posts, my purpose is to expose the fact that you have zero hands-on F40 experience and the majority of your posts here are erroneous information espoused from guesswork based on the internet. That makes sense, I figured it was 80697 in the early days prior to some modifications later which is why I posted those 2 images, thanks for confirming.
Until Tom confirmed that the actual LM car still existed you had no idea at all either, just like you had no idea the example you last posted was one with a production VIN from 3 years after that car was first built, how do you explain that fact?. Same with the facts regarding the engines fitted to US spec cars or being adamant that Ferrari only made 399 enzo plus one for the Pope, do you want me to show the most recent post where you proclaimed such? no idea what so ever there were another 100 plus Enzo's on the planet. Some expert you are. All Toms work regarding these two LM cars, which you will now claim you knew all along. That hole just keeps getting deeper for all to see from now to eternity on here, this is just a hobby for me, where as potential clients are reading all this from now on for you, many have told me already they would not go anywhere near anything you are involved in, keep up the good work Joseph.
Paul how much hands-on experience (internet observations and replica adventures don't count) do you have with F40s?
Irrelevant, posting their initials doesn't answer the basic question that has relevance and gives context to your content here, how much hands-on experience (internet observations and replica adventures with cats don't count) do you actually have with F40s?
Clear then that you did not know, and never had a clue the LM that was claimed to be the donor for the yellow car was still very much alive and in one piece, until such time as Tom posted that info up just a few days ago, comical trying to make me look stupid by understanding such up to that point and actually making yourself look a bigger fool instead by the very same marker. In relation to the F40 prototype pics you then posted, you did not know the VIN but later claimed you did, but only once Tom posted it up, but when Marcel posted the factory details for that VIN previously, showing it was claimed to be built in 1990 rather than 1987 you did not say a word. So come on then who is wrong? Marcels factory information that it is a 1990 production car and not a prototype or Toms that it is the period pics you posted up of an original 1987 prototype, both of them cannot be right! You do realise that this constant denigration by you on here of anyone with the skills to undertake an actual project is below you and not worthy, is simply insulting every mechanical person reading this also, some of us build not buy, there is a whole industry out there, take a visit to SEMA one day it would knock your blinkers off. Comical how you thought you were so skilled because you rattle canned a heat shield off an an F40 once in your garage and that's it! bet you have never even lifted a spanner to fix your lawn mower. I have pulled apart and rebuilt things as simple as a 50cc two stroke at 15 years old through to far more complicated Ferrari V12 engines since and everything in between, the engine in an F40 is simply a derivation of that fitted to the 308, a very basic one at that. I can keep this up for ever Joseph, I am only an enthusiast on here as I have always stated, I don't earn my living from selling other peoples assets like yourself and living off the crumbs left on the table. Fchat is the go to place online, more and more people new to the marque and looking to buy an F40 will be reading your constant drivel, remember that.
Priceless! Alas, I don't own a lawn mower Dear Paul you were so wrong about 79890, Tom corrected you, and boy did that set you off! Look, as they say, "to err is human", I admit like all humans I often make mistakes but I'm happy to learn from them and update my data where necessary and as I said very recently here on FChat when corrected by a kind gentleman: "I stand corrected". I think you should simply say the same about your erroneous information about 79890 rather than give excuses suggesting you relied on an internet article. Not long ago you were caught and admitted to not being able to tell the difference between a fake CGI image of a 288 GTO & F40 you took from Facebook, and you admitted that, so as you know it's not that hard.
« I can keep up this forever » please don’t, please go in private message to speak to each other. I deal with enough bad atmosphere and stress everyday at work, and there are so much more misery and pain in the world right now that dont help to lift the spirits and mood…. This is a Ferrari forum, a place I like to visit after work, to decompress and learn about my passion. Passion is supposed to bring people together: you can teach to others, you can learn from others. And all that in a respectful way.
So you are stating here and now that before Tom posted that 79890 was still in one piece that you also knew that for certain? Now be very careful before you confirm such, as only a handful of people knew that for a fact, and where the car actually was, if you claim you also knew, they will want proof from you of such, they are active on this forum and will no doubt call you out. With regards 80697 is it either a 1990 production car or a 1987 Prototype? again very few people knew the facts behind this car, are you claiming you were one of them? they will want proof if you claim such
Dear Paul. As regards 79890 You said: Just realised this is the one that became the yellow convertible Tom said: OMG that story is debunked long time ago. That yellow look-a-like LM was a Berlinetta then converted to barchetta. It is not a Ferrari but a “kitcar; carbon tub. Nothing original, only a F40 engine modified and modified again since in Dutch ownership The original 79890 is in France; never restored I said: Did you learn that on Facebook? And then all hell broke loose Seriously, do relax, we all make mistakes. As regards 80697 I honestly do not know that car's provenance, I am here learning like most people. I am entirely okay with the idea that it was the numberless Prototype and has always been that car and Ferrari SpA later gave it an identity a couple year after it was built just so it could be sold, I have no issue with that concept, that sort of thing happened with Ferrari SpA and other manufacturers. Marcel hasn't questioned it's provenance per se, and I am not questioning Tom's representation of the car as he says he has actually inspected it and I have nothing to contradict his claim. It's a pretty cool F40 though.
80697: Completed 22 January 1990. Sold new to Michelotto. Engine #17853, gearbox #625, body #193. All of the above comes straight from Maranello, just FYI. If it is "correct", who knows? Correct in what regard? Guys, please relax. Thank you. Marcel Massini