15607 for sale @ FastCars in Redondo Beach, CA April 2024 Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
Karen, I haven't read the 200 previous posts in this thread. I simply saw the thread title and thought, "Oh, I just saw one of these FOR SALE at FastCars recently." No link to an ad, no endorsement of any kind. Simply a fact and documented for historical purposes. Cheers.
Dear Mr. Magnum, if no endorsement was intended, why not just say “VIN, seen recently at F. C.” or something and leave it at that ? Sincerely, Karen
No harm done, IMHO. I enjoy seeing the cars for sale worldwide and don't have a problem with a repeat.
I hear you Mike and have no problem with others enjoying perusing or posting cars for sale, but just never understood why grown people aren’t able to follow simple forum (not my) rules or common courtesy. And I’m sure you know when one starts ignoring rules, next thing we see is bunch idiots following the suit. Plenty of evidence in this (and other) forum(s). Perhaps I just have to accept the harsh reality of what George Carlin observed long ago. Or Ron White.
Hood cable routing pictures as promised. Let me know if you have questions. Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
Note that the bolts holding the latch assembly on are sleeved. Mine had 2 of the sleeves missing, which allows the exterior of the latch to be crushed, which affects the operation of the moving parts. A simple bushing made in the lathe solved this problem. As far as your last comment..... I get where you are coming from. I enjoy looking at any pictures posted for reference to the varying way these cars were built, or changed over the years. IMHO of course, Timo.
Thanks Mike, much appreciated. Comparing yours to the car I’m working on and several other examples I’ve received photos of privately, I guess I just entered yet another rabbit hole of inconsistencies plaguing 50+ year old Ferraris.
Inconsistencies, or variations by owners tinkering over the years? Also to be noted that from October 1972 there were some changes to these cars from the factory. Besides, different countries asked for differences to the original design of some items from the onset, due to their country's regulations which were really bubbling by the end of the 60's.
Actually both, i.e. at least to me, it has been clear for a long time that most larger scale Ferrari production runs built 50+ years ago had myriad of inconsistencies/variations in their assembly and manufacturing efforts & techniques that weren’t even related to any regulatory mandates. Just the way they were built. And “tinkering” by owners or their mechanics/restorers over the past half a century doesn’t make authentication of countless small details any easier.
Correct. I have an even numbered C4. How is that possible? They put the last digit, a 9, in upside down in the stampings. Hence all subsequent paperwork quoted the serial number ending in 6. Plus I've seen lots of factory variations. The parts bins were sometimes empty, orders needed filling, so substitute parts were used. No ISO9000 certification in those days. I've seen electric fuel pumps installed in different locations, and yes, from the factory. So don't sweat differences in originality. It happened all the time back in those days.
Having had opportunities to restore and work on numerous Daytonas (+ several other make/model vintage cars) and studied their construction & production variations, I’ve long ago learned there can be countless detail, part or small hardware changes throughout their production timeline and some may never make any sense at all. AFAIK, Daytonas, for example, were constructed in 50-100 unit batches every few months through their 4+ year production timeline and while I wasn’t there to document any of it, I can easily imagine changes, be they in personnel, regulatory or supplies, etc that occurred between each batch and countless small variations they brought along. As I’ve said before, I could likely fill a book or two with “evidence” I’ve collected pointing to all this. This is something many fail to consider when they assume or expect each and every example to be exactly like all others.
One classic is the hood insulation in a Daytona is silver, but black in a C4. Why? Who knows. Maybe because the C4s were made by Pinninfarina, whereas the Daytona was a Scaglietti build.
Yes, that is why. It must also be noted that Pininfarina build was of a higher standard and quality that the Scaglietti build. Hence the better build quality of the GTC/4 when compared to the 365 GTB/4.
Please explain and provide clear/comprehensive evidence, not just some few minor construction features or someone else’s possibly biased claims/opinions. Personally, having worked on numerous 365 GTB/4s, a few 330 GTCs & now one C/4 + observed countless others in the past two+ decades, I wouldn’t necessarily make a blanket claim or statement PF constructed cars being “better built” than those by Scagliettis. They (PF built cars) do appear to have some construction method & material differences, but overall, I don’t see them being considerably “better”, just somewhat “different”, but perhaps in time I learn more and might change my opinion/view on this matter.
I have never owned a Scaglietti built car but 2 Pininfarina built cars namely a 365 GT and a 365 GTC/4. I have always been impressed by their general build : lack of rust or very minimal ; closure of apertures ; strong interior of wheel arches and generally great fit of glazing and fittings all round. I have friends with Daytonas and Dinos who grumble a lot about things I mentioned which are great in my examples.
I believe I just figured out the attachments sequence for both the primary and secondary (i.e. emergency) hood release cables, but unlike in Daytona, the latter being only available for one side, it does leave the other latch somewhat more vulnerable in case of cable breakage. I wonder why they, i.e. Pininfarina, opted for this less practical approach ?
15551 at GW. Yeesh, I didn't think these cars rusted that bad. Major money to correct this sadly negelcted example. Image Unavailable, Please Login
When they got love in the past and enough preservation then only the typical eras make rust problems. One of the biggest problem zones are the front air „hoses“ because they collect water and mud on the underside of the hose. My mechanic did that on several 365 GTC/4 so the result was great. No fillerpaste, all metal and paint thickness matches the rest of the first paint. All 365 GTC/4 owners should look after this spot because it‘s difficult to see and even more if there are no signs like bubbles on the outside. Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login