LaFerrari replacement: v12, no hybrid, less power than SF90stradale?

I Also think the Front Boot luggage area on the F40 was shaped that way to look like you could easily put a spare in as some countries require room for a spare to be road legal

 

Another nice one from Derek
Image Unavailable, Please Login

 

I think there is something more to the vent/area in the middle at the top that's still being hidden on the Engine cover.

 

Yes, maybe some detail down the spine like on SP3, but also something at the very back of the engine cover, looks like.

 

There is a Camera there but not sure if it will stay as a small wing has appeared in the middle of the engine cover that looks like a camera holder one. on some of the latest mutes

 

do you have a full version of your render? A bit of it is cut off

 

I was just trying to capture the cabin and the rear. If I get some time I’ll try to detail the car front to rear.

 

maybe this:

https://www.ferrarichat.com/forum/posts/148671202/

 

Top of the wing will be I guess.

 

Then they should not be allocated one.

Nobody said it shouldn't be road legal, nor that they should make that many of them.

I think Ferrari should make 100 for 5 million each.

Well it should.

It's not a track monster by modern standards.
But it was great for its time.
And more importantly, it's a driver's car. It's light, gives lots of feedback and doesn't have any annoying electronics.

 

The only reason it was the fastest is due to the advancements in technology, especially the aerodynamics.

In most cases, it does.

Only due to the fact that that car was the better package overall and far more dominant.
But if those lighter McLarens had improved realiability and aerodinamics, I'd guarantee you he'd pick them.

This makes no sense whatsoever.

That's cause the Elise had a 3rd of the 458's horsepower.
Now picture the Elise, yet with the same HP as the 458.

I meant taking the concept of the 911, i.e. improving the car with each new generation, not keeping the same design.

No they wouldn't go broke at all. The HALO car is just a small part of their market sales, their other models would more than make up for it.

It improves it. The purists will feel very special, chosen ones.

Yes, cause up until now, they put proper engines in their car.

 

They will probably make 30 of the track only XX program versions and sell them for the price you suggest so your suggestion will probably be realized.


Sent from my iPad using FerrariChat

 

My guess is Full Carbon

 

Yes, but those XX versions will still have the crappy V6 instead of a V12.

 

Curious Mr. Bravo, do you have any significant seat time in a 296 or a 499P Modificata, either on a street or track (499P track only)?

 

A lot of discussion on this at Monterey. Regardless, the new V6 car will have to be faster and it will be. Sure most of us would prefer more cylinders, but if it is faster that is what matters most for a track car. I am not giving up my allocation as long as it is faster and it will be.

Why do you say the V6 is crappy? I understand the legacy allure of the V12 and own a bunch of them, but I would not say the v6 is crappy. The 296 challenge V6 car is about 3 seconds faster a lap than the F488 Challange car, what would you prefer to drive the slower V8 or the crappy V6 as you say that is faster?


Sent from my iPad using FerrariChat

 

The V6 will beat the V12 so not a track monster like you want.

 

Actually, the V6 needs a lot of help, 2 turbos and and electric motor(s)...so, the V12 actually beats the V6 if you remove all its helpers...

 

They are not helpers lmao plus that a 3L vs 6.5L that's must be a helper in your book too

 

Pagani put NA engine for Huayra track version .... but this new Ferrari will have no space in engine bay to put V12 or even V10 for XX

 

The V6 instead of the V12 has nothing to do with Space

 

nonsense, so put V12 from 812 into 296 if engine bay size doesn't matter

 

Is the general consensus now that those minimally camouflaged cars are the last of the test cars ? What I mean is it likely that with the camo off that they’ll be the launch cars ? Name is not important but also very important in its own way -I’ve always assumed that they left the name till the last minute but in this case I think they’ll already know - I can’t see them leaving ANYTHING to last minute , ad hoc decisions for the most important model in a decade …

 

Some of you are forgetting that the halo cars often are a technology test bed, i.e. the V12 of the Enzo or the hybrid stuff of LaFerrari ended in the cheaper cars. This makes sense as it spreads the development cost between models.

I suppose the next SF90 will be a version of this car made of aluminium.