355 - Fiorano Handling Package Fork for rear suspension lower arm question | FerrariChat

355 Fiorano Handling Package Fork for rear suspension lower arm question

Discussion in '348/355' started by radback, Sep 2, 2025 at 9:59 AM.

Tags:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. radback

    radback Formula Junior
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 14, 2020
    783
    France
    Hi,
    I wonder what is the purpose of the Fiorano Handling Package fork for rear lower arm?

    At first I thought it was to keep the same camber while lowering the car (as lowering the car increase negative rear camber) but after looking this picture, it looks to me that the anchor point is of course lower but also farest than the stock position:
    Image Unavailable, Please Login

    So after all, it should increase negative camber, not diminish it.
    Am I right?

    Why would you want to increase rear negative camber on a car that has already more camber than stock because of the lowering?

    Thank you.

    PS: Which forks are mounted on the Challenge? Same as the FHP ones?
     
    lanab likes this.
  2. bobzdar

    bobzdar F1 Veteran

    Sep 22, 2008
    6,910
    Richmond
    Full Name:
    Pete
    They are shimmed to get desired camber either way, so it's not so important where the hole is laterally.

    I think the purpose is to keep the lower arm in the same place with the lower ride height, which would increase camber gain under compression if the upper arm mounting were not also adjusted similarly.
     
  3. ShineKen

    ShineKen Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Aug 3, 2007
    20,015
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Nostradamus
    I discussed this in the FHP thread I started. My guess is it has to do with maintaining a certain suspension geometry front/rear rake when one installs FHP springs. If I recall correctly, it increases the suspension rake while the changes from the outside of the car less noticeable (still normal looking).

    I believe increasing the rake provides more front grip/over steer.
     
  4. ShineKen

    ShineKen Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Aug 3, 2007
    20,015
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Nostradamus
    Challenge cars have standard rear forks. FHP rear forks are unique to FHP cars.
     
  5. ShineKen

    ShineKen Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Aug 3, 2007
    20,015
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Nostradamus
    And yes, FHP cars run more rear camber than a standard car. There could be a limit to how much negative rear camber a standard car can run.
     
  6. radback

    radback Formula Junior
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 14, 2020
    783
    France
    This is really curious.

    FHP camber setting is about -2° 30' while Challenge one is max -3°45.

    On a Delta-Ve article on suspension it said that you must have the modified rear forks to get that much of camber.
    So how could the Challenge cars have regulars rear forks?

     
  7. radback

    radback Formula Junior
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 14, 2020
    783
    France
    I forgot the regular F355 stock alignment: -2° rear camber.

    Pretty close to the -2°30' of the FHP.
     
  8. ShineKen

    ShineKen Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Aug 3, 2007
    20,015
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Nostradamus
    “May” and “must” are 2 different things ;).


    I’ve already checked challenge cars and they have standard forks. The aggressive rear camber is probably coming from adding a bunch of shims. He said “may” because there could be a point too many shims is not ideal posing a safety or effectiveness issue.

    FHP cars have 1-2 shims.


    This is the reason I believe the FHP rear forks is more about rake adjustments than camber adjustments. Aggressive camber can be had with shims. He also spoke of the importance of torque’ing the nut properly. Too many shims might shorten the shaft/thread length of the fork to catch.
     
  9. ShineKen

    ShineKen Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Aug 3, 2007
    20,015
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Nostradamus
    “This much camber may necessitate changing the lower control arm mount forks. Always torque lower control arm mount forks properly and replace the nuts with new Nylocks after a few uses. Check lower fork nuts pre/ post track events.”


    Adding too many shims may shorten the threads on the fork to catch and torque properly.
     
  10. radback

    radback Formula Junior
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 14, 2020
    783
    France
    You're right, might be not related to camber after all.

    Rake or what Bobzdar said.
    I'm sure Mitch Alsup could help us about this... :)
     
  11. MAD828

    MAD828 F1 Rookie

    Oct 8, 2011
    2,637
    Sydney
    Full Name:
    Elliott Caras
    Its for correcting the geometry with the car now lowered in conjunction with the FHP springs, helps to correct bump steer. It was very noticeable once I installed these that the car had a more planted rear end.
     

Share This Page