348 intake | FerrariChat

348 intake

Discussion in '348/355' started by eyboro, Oct 27, 2008.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. eyboro

    eyboro Formula Junior Silver Subscribed

    Joined:
    May 30, 2004
    Messages:
    989
    Location:
    Chicago
    Full Name:
    Eitan
  2. Tom_C

    Tom_C Karting

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2008
    Messages:
    233
    Location:
    Raleigh area, NC
    Full Name:
    Tom C
    Saw that myself browsing the parts, and although I think it looks a lot better than stock (in theory, the colors are not to my taste) I would think that it would actually be detrimental to performance due to pulling in hot engine bay air, rather than through the door strakes (mines a spider)

    I'd also think that you could cobble your own together a good bit cheaper than $300...

    The above are just thoughts and opinions, and we all know what they are like... :)
     
  3. Miltonian

    Miltonian F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2002
    Messages:
    5,966
    Location:
    Milton, Wash.
    Full Name:
    Jeff B.
    Just my opinion, but I would describe these things as total crapp on ANY car, and an absolute joke on a Ferrari.
     
  4. plugzit

    plugzit F1 Veteran Silver Subscribed

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2004
    Messages:
    7,795
    Location:
    Redondo Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Bruce Bogart
    It's my understanding that the stock intake system creates positive pressure at speed, therefore increasing horsepower. I would think, therefore, that merely adding a K&N filter to the stock system would generate more horsepower than one that draws air from the engine compartment at atmospheric pressure. Maybe also why static dyno figures have trouble coming up to factory horsepower readings too. Remember "Ram Air"?
     
    Last edited: Oct 27, 2008
  5. hotrod406

    hotrod406 Formula Junior

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2007
    Messages:
    540
    Location:
    Grand rapids area,MI
    Full Name:
    Tim
    That's some Ferrari tax!! $300 for $35 worth of parts.
     
  6. speedy_sam

    speedy_sam F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2004
    Messages:
    5,559
    Location:
    TX
    Full Name:
    Sameer
    +100.
     
  7. Kaivball

    Kaivball Three Time F1 World Champ Owner

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2007
    Messages:
    35,997
    Location:
    Kalifornia
    Yikes, that thing is ugly.

    Kai
     
  8. vvassallo

    vvassallo F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2006
    Messages:
    8,329
    Location:
    Palos Verdes
    Full Name:
    Vince V
    It is an interesting set up, not unlike whatI was thinking of trying out on my car for a test. Not sure I want to spend $300 for it though.
     
  9. P3rcyp

    P3rcyp Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2008
    Messages:
    10
    Location:
    London, UK
    Full Name:
    Adam
    I have purchased some carbon fibre CDA BMC air filters. These attach on to the 348 and still utilise the air intake through the door strakes. The benefit over the standard air box is that carbon fibre doesn't heat up and so will keep the air constantly cool that flows through it.

    The air intake system on ebay mean that the filters are sitting right over the exhaust which is going to produce a lot of heat. This is not good. It also is sucking in air that is flowing around the engine compartment. This air, for want of a better description, is 'stale' air and not really being forced in to the air filters. Even the standard box is having cool air from outside being forced into it via the door strakes.

    It might look good but I think it would be a pile of sh!te. Think about it the faster you go forward, the more air is being sucked in through the door strakes. This type of set up could never take in as much air as that. The advert makes a point of saying that it sits on top of the exhaust heatshield but will definately not get hot air from this. Well last time I checked, hot air rises and so this would be inevitable.

    Not worth the money and could cause the engine to run hotter. Of course this is just my amature opinion.
     
  10. RebelBanker

    RebelBanker Karting

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2008
    Messages:
    232
    I've considered utilizing CDA's on my own personally designed system. Do you mind if I see a photo of what you've done with yours?
     
  11. P3rcyp

    P3rcyp Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2008
    Messages:
    10
    Location:
    London, UK
    Full Name:
    Adam
    I will post something up this weekend if I get the chance.

    Here is a picture of the engine bay from someone else who did it. He needs to tidy it up a little but you can see how it looks.
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  12. speedy_sam

    speedy_sam F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2004
    Messages:
    5,559
    Location:
    TX
    Full Name:
    Sameer
    Nice - can you feel any improvement in power with the BMCs?
     
  13. 3forty8

    3forty8 F1 Rookie Owner

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2006
    Messages:
    2,713
    Location:
    San Diego
    Full Name:
    Eric
    I would think it would be quite effective in reducing horsepower. The intake air would be hotter; the higher the intake air temp, the less dense the air is. Lower density = less HP. The rule-of-thumb I've heard is roughly a 1% HP decrease for every 10 degrees F increase in intake air temp, but I don't have a reference for that figure.
     
  14. Tom_C

    Tom_C Karting

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2008
    Messages:
    233
    Location:
    Raleigh area, NC
    Full Name:
    Tom C
    I LOVE the way the above picture looks, but looking at the BMC website am I correct in assuming you would have to order two kits, for a combined US currency amount of about $800????
    Anybody got a cheaper way?
     
  15. P3rcyp

    P3rcyp Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2008
    Messages:
    10
    Location:
    London, UK
    Full Name:
    Adam
    Since I live in Britain I obviously ordered mine here. I paid around £350 if I remember correctly and I got 2 boxes for this. I think back then the exchange rate was close to 2$ to the £ (oh how things change) so that would be close on $700 which would mean you are about right.

    I now it might be expensive but BMC are very good quality and someone told me that they manufacture parts for F1 racing so I am guessing they really know their stuff.
     
  16. angelis

    angelis F1 Veteran Owner

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2004
    Messages:
    6,400
    Location:
    London, England
    Full Name:
    Sy
    They also did an EVOLUTION II version as well which was supposed to be even better.

    For some reason they don't have that on their website anymore.
     
  17. gothspeed

    gothspeed F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    May 26, 2006
    Messages:
    10,244
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    Full Name:
    goth
    +1

    +2

    +3
     
  18. mihakrapez

    mihakrapez Karting

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    Messages:
    131
    Location:
    Slovenia-Europe
    Full Name:
    Miha
    It is not nearly as good looking or functional as the stock airbox (the only positive thing is the sound that it produces).

    I have original box fitted with original size K/N. It has acces to fresh air it has siphone for the water and looks nice.
    My opinion is that you loose hp with mounting theese on top of your exhaust.
     
  19. gothspeed

    gothspeed F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    May 26, 2006
    Messages:
    10,244
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    Full Name:
    goth
    +1 ............. the stock air boxes do have a nifty 'air water separator' ...... :)
     

Share This Page