"Go to first unread post in thread..." | FerrariChat

"Go to first unread post in thread..."

Discussion in 'Other Off Topic Forum' started by BubblesQuah, Sep 11, 2007.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. BubblesQuah

    BubblesQuah F1 World Champ Silver Subscribed

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2003
    Messages:
    13,201
    Location:
    Charlotte
    When I'm on the main forums listing screen - and I mouse over a thread title on the right - there is a "tool tip" popup that says "Go to first unread post in xxxxxxx".

    If I click on that, I usually go deep into the thread - even on threads I've never read before and where the first unread post would actually be post #1 - instead of going to the acutal "first unread post".

    Does this work for anyone else?
     
  2. shahedc

    shahedc Formula 3

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2007
    Messages:
    1,625
    Location:
    Washington DC
    Maybe no one is answering because the feature didn't work for them either... and they weren't able to jump to the first unread post in this thread... :)

    To answer your question... yes you're right, it seems to jump all over the place when I click on it.

    ~shahedc
    .
     
  3. djui5

    djui5 F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2006
    Messages:
    5,418
    Location:
    Phoenix, Arizona
    It probably takes you to the first post since your last log-in. Meaning if someone had posted #46 on a thread last time you were here, and now the thread has 58 posts, it would take you to post #47.

    I guess it "assumes" you read every thread on the forum. Ferrarichat is kinda conceided like that ;)
     
  4. TG

    TG F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2004
    Messages:
    6,290
    Location:
    Newport Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Taylor
    Weird I just noticed that for the first time about 5 minutes ago.
     
  5. menoy

    menoy F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,661
    Location:
    PL
    Full Name:
    MRodziewicz
    Yeah I think that's the way it works. With 48k members (sure, not all active) it would take quite a lot to keep track of each and every user's reading...
     

Share This Page