Question re: how engine revolutions "decay" | FerrariChat

Question re: how engine revolutions "decay"

Discussion in 'Technical Q&A' started by Doody, Jun 28, 2004.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Doody

    Doody F1 Veteran

    Nov 16, 2001
    6,099
    MA USA
    Full Name:
    Mr. Doody
    i'll apologize up-front if this is a stupid question. what i don't know about engine design you just might be to cram into the Hollywood Bowl. but this has been a curiosity of mine for years, so here goes....

    you hit the gas. the engine revs up. you take your foot off the gas and press the clutch. the engine revs down.

    how fast the engine revs up is obvious, at least in general terms.

    but how fast the engine revs down to idle has always been of interest to me. is this rate of change ENGINEERED or does this "just happen"? with the clutch depressed and gas pedal untouched, what are the factors that dictate how fast the engine decreases its RPMs, and is that all carefully engineered?

    i would assume this to be an important issue in mating an engine design with a transmission design such that during an upshift the revs don't decrease so fast that you can't achieve a rev-match when you're upshifting without a separate blip.

    i have had various manual tranny cars from various manufacturers over the years, and uniformly i've been able to clutch, shift, and de-clutch such that the RPMs didn't fall so fast as to be unable to de-clutch with the input shaft spinning at or near the optimal rate of the wheels/tranny. and it has never required an ultra-lightning-quick shift either. you have to be quick about it, for sure, but you don't have to be jumpin' jack flash either. my porsches and ferraris seem (seem) to decay faster than my audis, bmws, and hondas have. this suggests to me that it's probably (carefully) engineered.

    so is this just "dumb luck" that these systems work this way or is this engineered, and if so, how? what is retarding the engine RPM decrease once you have stopped giving it gas and disconnected it from the tranny?

    again, sorry if this is a dumb question. but i'm curious.

    doody.
     
  2. AR!

    AR! Formula Junior

    Apr 8, 2004
    981
    Berlin, Germany
    Interesting topic.

    I can only help with a small portion of knowledge: The rate at which an engine revs down is part of the engineering process. When it revs down too fast use a heavier fly wheel or anything with a similar effect, vice versa. I have this from a former colleague who studied automotive engineering.

    Now the guesswork: The engine components in a sports car are much lighter (because of material and design, just compare the pistons of a Ferrari to those of a "normal" car....). So this is maybe why they store less kinetic energy which leads to a faster drop of rpm when releasing the throttle?
     
  3. Ken

    Ken F1 World Champ

    Oct 19, 2001
    16,078
    Arlington Heights IL
    Full Name:
    Kenneth
    Not a dumb question at all. I'm no expert, but a highway cruiser would have a heavy flywheel for efficiency, while a sports car that changes speeds rapidly would want a very light flywheel for quicker acceleration. I would think all sports cars and luxury GTs have this engineered in.

    Then there are issues of a small 12 cylinder car's piston/drivetrain inertia vs. a larger V8 or less. More moving parts in the 12 but smaller, lighter parts. Ferrari went to 10 cylinders for the F1 cars yet has 8 and 12's for the road cars. Not all decisions are done by engineers obviously; the 8's were seen as an "American" cylinder count...

    Ken
     
  4. Auraraptor

    Auraraptor F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Sep 25, 2002
    14,111
    MO
    Full Name:
    Omar
    It takes Work to keep the rpms up. When then energy being applied to do the work is stopped, then the car slowly returns to its rest state. How fast it returns relates to how easily it gets up there. Lighter parts, faster it gets up there, faster it falls down.

    See this thread:

    http://ferrarichat.com/forum/showthread.php?t=21735

    *At least thats how I fig it*
     
  5. Doody

    Doody F1 Veteran

    Nov 16, 2001
    6,099
    MA USA
    Full Name:
    Mr. Doody
    way neat data on the F512M decaying "too fast" for an upshift. neat. isn't that a "bad idea"? that is, won't that inhibit overall performance and/or encourage more component wear? why do you think they did that?

    the answer to my question appears to be "of course it's engineered" and since i assume the cylinder and rods are optimized for combustion purposes, it's the back end of the equation, closer to the transmission, that gets engineered to set up an optimal decay rate by increasing or decreasing mass there. of course it's all a connected system, so nothing's happening in vaccuum per se.

    thanks guys!

    doody.
     
  6. Auraraptor

    Auraraptor F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Sep 25, 2002
    14,111
    MO
    Full Name:
    Omar
    Personally, I think of it as a quality of the car. Makes it harder to drive well and thus harder for joe schomo to drive well. Then again it is my favorite car, so if it was just thought out poorly, I don't care...its still a damn awesome car. :)
     
  7. tbakowsky

    tbakowsky Two Time F1 World Champ
    Consultant Professional Ferrari Technician

    Sep 18, 2002
    20,040
    The Cold North
    Full Name:
    Tom
    Alot of it also has to do with parasitic loads on an engine. You have alternators, a/c, pwr steering, water pump, timing belts, transmissin input shafts and clutch assemblies etc, all being turned by the engine. Which will affect the rate of speed and engine can rev up and down. If you have ever worked on an old chevy 350, you will notice a huge difference when you run the engine with no belts attached to the accessories in they way it rev's up and down. But as soon as all the stuff is attached again it really slows it down.

    Many car makes compensate for this load by going to light weight internals inside the engine...crank, pistons, valves, hollow camshafts etc. And like others have said they will also use lighter clutch assemblies and flywheels.
     
  8. Dale

    Dale F1 Veteran

    Oct 7, 2003
    5,211
    uk
    Full Name:
    Dale Juan
    Doody hi,we know we are in atmo 14.somthing PSI depending on where you are on the planet,ok youve opened the throttle and there is still a vac down there so atmo is still runing in, then you snap it off ,the 14 somthing atmo lost it down the plenum tract but still active gas but soon put to sleep,
    so we know the flywheel is holding the energy just look at f1 engines kill the spark it stops dead same as a bike motor no flywheel,
    i belive there as to be an issue with vac in the cylinders during throttle off,
    think of it as when you throttle stright back on the plenum tracts should charge up with good atmo pressure as long as you dont let it get close to idel rpm,
    good post Doody young up and coming techs should be taught this,not to indepth its very complex,

    cheers
    Dale.
     
  9. 911Fan

    911Fan Formula 3

    Apr 15, 2004
    1,294
    Southern California
    Most sports cars these days have a computer between the accelerator and the mechanical throttle control. So pressing the gas pedal does not directly activate a butterfly valve as in the old days. Instead, it tells the computer what you want to do and the computer then decides how best to accomplish it, even imposing some nanny overrides if necessary. So the computer ultimately controls the throttle mechanism.

    So you're right, the throttle response has been engineered via software in the typical modern sports car. fwiw, the 996 has terrible throttle over-run compared to a 360 (ie, the revs decay slowly when you take your foot off the gas).
     
  10. 4i2fly

    4i2fly Formula 3

    Apr 16, 2004
    1,333
    SF, Bay Area
    This is an interesting subject. I had always learned when up shifting into the gear and while clutch is being released to feather the throttle for a smooth transition (works well in my 996, and my BMW). On the other hand, depending on the driving style (i.e. going through the gears medium to moderately fast) this technique doesn't work as well for 360M because the throttle response is so sudden getting the right amount at the release of the clutch is just too cumbersome and result in jerky and excessive clutch wear. I do instead blip the throttle on the upshift and they are smooth as butter. On the other hand if going through the gears fast RPM doesn't have time to drop too much the blipping is not necessary. Good topic indeed.
     
  11. chrismorse

    chrismorse Formula 3

    Feb 16, 2004
    2,150
    way north california
    Full Name:
    chris morse
    The first serious race car i ever drove was a pumped up striped out cherry speedster with an 8 pound flywheel. very quick engine revs and very quick engine decay.
    Since that time long ago, I have built a few hot rod motors, toyota, porsche, volkswagen and on each of them, I have lightened the flywheel or bought a light weight unit, even once going to an aluminum pressure plate, carillo rods and forged pistons with thin taper wall wrist pins all to reduce the MOMENT OF INERTIA to get it to rev up and decay Quickly. Fast throttle response is a joy to drive, even though i still stall the race truck with the 11 pound steel billet flywheel frequently, it is still a lot of fun to drive.
    Some emission equipment causes slow decay but the biggie by a BIG margine is the flywheel and clutch combo. Makes it easy to drive, makes it smooth, dampens out those vicious little power pulses too.
    My guess is that parasitic drag is roughly the same, alternator, waterpump ps pump.

    FWIW when i have to do a clutch on the 308, i will do a light weight flywheel and a borg & Beck multiplate, (read low inertia and strong) clutch, assuming that the cost isn't too outrageous.

    happy motoring,
    chris
     

Share This Page