To Flatout racing...racing the 355 | Page 2 | FerrariChat

To Flatout racing...racing the 355

Discussion in 'Other Racing' started by fatbillybob, Nov 20, 2004.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. maranelloman

    maranelloman Guest

    But Jeff...aren't the GAC-spec HoosierDaddies a much different, and stickier, compound that the HoosierDaddies we can all buy at TireRack? I have heard they are remarkably better...
     
  2. Jeff Segal

    Jeff Segal Rookie

    Nov 6, 2003
    35
    No no no! The Hoosier "SGS" compound from last year, which is now this year's "GT" tire IS better than the Grand-Am Cup tire. While heavily based ON the Grand-Am Cup tire construction, it is a full slick, and performs better as such. The Grand-Am Cup tire looks, acts, and is to the best of my knowledge a *slightly* different version of an R3S03 (or whatever Hoosier's big R-Comp was at the time).

    When we ran, this SGS tire was not yet available... It was still a prototype. We ran on Hoosier "GAC" R-Compound tires, complete with grooves/ "tread", and 40+psi operating pressures... It was interesting to say the least, but ultimately, we got the car pretty darn close to the times that the Challenge guys had run on Pirelli slicks. It was EVIL to drive, but certainly no 7-9 seconds...

    -Jeff
     
  3. maranelloman

    maranelloman Guest

    Ah, OK, thanks for the clarification.
     
  4. FLATOUTRACING

    FLATOUTRACING F1 Rookie

    Aug 20, 2001
    2,684
    East Coast
    Full Name:
    Jon K.
    Rob S.,

    I understand that the Z06 is easier to drive fast, but do you think with two world class drivers the Z06 in T1 form is faster than the 355 (again in T1 form)?

    Dave,

    The GAC Hoosier that Jeff raced on is very close in performance to the old SO3's. I was buying used GAC Hoosiers for my BMW track car. From what I was told the CAG was simply a slightly harder compound than the Hoosiers you buy at Tirerack.

    I can mirror what Jeff has said about running a Challenge car (355 not a 360) that is set up for Pirellis on the Hoosiers.

    Evil is a good way to describe the feeling. The tires had a very "mushy" feel to them an on very fast high speed corners it felt like the sidewalls were being strained.

    It speaks volumes for Jeff's ability to get within 2 seconds of the 360 C pole time (on slicks). I felt that my car was very unstable on the Hoosiers especially under braking.

    Regards,

    Jon
     
  5. mfennell70

    mfennell70 Formula Junior

    Nov 3, 2003
    597
    Middletown, NJ
    How do you define a "little"? :) I think if you put the car on scales you might not even be able to tell the difference in weight distribution from a change in ride height within reasonable limits. From a Grassroots Motorsports article on corner weighting:
    There actually is an effect but it's so small as to be negligible in the calculations.

    I completely believe your car is working better but it's not from weight distribution. If I had to guess (with my complete-amateur-beginner-suspension-guy hat on), what you're really feeling is the higher roll center in the front of the car from raising the suspension. The car understeers a little more and feels more comfortable coming into corners with the brakes on.
     
  6. fatbillybob

    fatbillybob Two Time F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner

    Aug 10, 2002
    28,657
    socal

    Jon,

    I do not think your question can ever be answered because my understanding is SCCA T-1 is not a "worldclass" area where you would ever catch really hot guy in...maybe david coutard...oooh that's gotta hurt. T-1 really is guy's like me club level taken to just about the highest level for guy's like me. That said, you have alot of guy's like me running T-1 cars and the rules for these cars are really not much more than Ferrari challenge rules (meaning low budget) except a 355 will need a welded cage to be legal and that crappy 355 cage can be made legal just by welding it. T-1 Z06's have no mods except a non-chassis stiffening cage T-1 shocks,springs, swaybars, oil/trans cooler. This is very similar to a 355C 1995 kit or the sportiva factory mods 96 onward. At the end of the day the Z06's dominate the field and that's about the best you can do for a mostly safety modified streetcar. To go to the next level you get to the GT world challenge cars and LeMan's and then you have the Z06's competing with the like of prodrive 575 guys etc. in heavily modifed cars and the Z06's got a bunch of those titles too and LeMan's win's.
    At my extremely rookie level I have only tracked a 348 in C trim but lightened and play in low level race groups due to my own time and commitment level. I got to drive the 360C on a track about two months ago that never changes and my laptimes were "x" and I did not feel confident in the car just like I have never really felt good in my own car. A month ago I was in a stock Z06 with T-1 swaybars, DOT r compound (Calof. license plate and street legal!) on the same track...I was faster with confidence...My one datapoint. Was the car faster? Was I faster because I had more confidence and drove faster? I don't care I was faster. You said the 360C is lighter with more or = Hp and should beat the Z06 hands down. Well not what I have seen at my low club level with us crappy drivers. A huge problem I see with 360's at the club level is dependance on the SD2 and other electronics issues. I fear the 430 will be worse and I'll have a hard time dealing with the Ferrari hassle factor. I would pay extra for a car that worked better. Racers do lots of their own things and once you get past the 355 the DIY'Er has more problems. There are rumors that you can't even bleed 360 brakes properly without the SD2. Once you get to the 360c pricetag the Porsche GT3 cup is a much better car and closer to a real racecar IMHO. Additionally, Porsche has a whole factory race division to help the club racers get parts rebuild sealed motors etc...
     
  7. FLATOUTRACING

    FLATOUTRACING F1 Rookie

    Aug 20, 2001
    2,684
    East Coast
    Full Name:
    Jon K.

    Bob,

    Don't let the term club racing fool you. I know what you mean by the term. It's mean to describe low cost amateur racing (or at least low cost compared to ALMS or Grand Am). But that being said there are some world class drivers in SCCA and T1.

    When I mean world class I am not referring to Senna or Schumacher. Remember there are plenty of pros who started (and still race) in club racing.

    John Heinracy may have a day job at GM, but he is a world class driver. No one get's into a SWC Caddy and matches Ron Fellows lap times.

    Bobby Archer (previous T1 big wig and SWC racer) was in my opinion and world class driver (though some may dispute this).

    Michael Galati, Randy Pobst, and others raced in the same SCCA club racers we do and some still come back on a regular basis.

    I think the top one or two finishers in most classes at the Run Offs have world class talent or darn near close.

    Some have neither the budget nor the time to race professionally but do have the talent.

    As in any race series (whether it be ALMS, Grand Am or SCCA at the Regional level) there will be people who truly have talent, people who don't but are very proficient through practice (I put myself in this category) and then those who will never be fast but are having fun (which is all that really counts at the SCCA level).

    Don't sell the talent short in T1 at the National level. There are some great racers out there.

    As far as which car made you comfortable I don't doubt the Zo6 made you faster. I think the car is the car to have in T1 because of that reason. You can learn more in that car in a faster time period than in a 360 or 355.

    I think the Zo6 will be the weapon of choice for years to come in T1. The GT3 is a great car but costs twice as much and is still down on torque. The Viper is just too heavy and expensive (now 90K).

    Regards,

    Jon
     
  8. maranelloman

    maranelloman Guest


    Actually, it understeers less. It is about as perfectly balanced between understeer & oversteer as it has ever been. I tend to have an extremely smooth driving style, and my new setup compliments it very well. We raised the front ride height apprix. 0.7", and it really changed a lot!!
     
  9. rob lay

    rob lay Administrator
    Staff Member Admin Miami 2018 Owner Social Subscribed

    Dec 1, 2000
    63,539
    Southlake, TX
    Full Name:
    Rob Lay
    I don't see much difference between the top SCCA club racers and the majority of "pro" racers in ALMS, GA, GA Cup, and Porsche Cup. Well, actually, money! That's the only thing holding back many of the Club Racers from going pro. Many "pro" racers would be middle of pack or worse in club races. However, I do think the best of the best have found their way to pro one way or another. Not much external funding in pro racing, but the little that there is will find the best of the best.

    Next to your name at ALMS, GA, and GA Cup they should have the title "paid pro" or "pro paid". :D Not that I'm complaining, I'm stuck in Spec. RX7 as a "amateur paid".
     
  10. mfennell70

    mfennell70 Formula Junior

    Nov 3, 2003
    597
    Middletown, NJ
    With a little more thought, I can see why that could be so. Higher front roll center == less front weight transfer. Normally, this would mean more understeer. HOWEVER, the M3 has a strut suspension and probably not great camber curves. The camber advantage of not rolling as much outweighs the weight transfer effect. Another possibility is that your lower ride height was occaisionally kissing the bumpstops which really screws things up by increasing spring rates dramatically and unpredictibly.

    Or something. :)


    Separately, I agree with Rob. There is defintely serious overlap between top flight "club" racers and "pros". I know "club" guys who were beating current "pros" when they raced together but one put together the right program and the other never did. It certainly is a lot easier to get into the top series if you start with a strong checkbook.
     
  11. fatbillybob

    fatbillybob Two Time F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner

    Aug 10, 2002
    28,657
    socal
    Well Gee guys...it is nice to know that the pros are so close to the top club racers. That means as a driver... I only SUCK instead of REALLY REALLY SUCK!
     
  12. rob lay

    rob lay Administrator
    Staff Member Admin Miami 2018 Owner Social Subscribed

    Dec 1, 2000
    63,539
    Southlake, TX
    Full Name:
    Rob Lay
    Don't get ahead of yourself now. :D In equally prepared RX7's, we'll have a variance in lap times of 10 seconds from front to back. :) The front is full of Australian karting champions, 20+ years experience racers, and me! ;) The back is anyone with a car and learners permit. Although I do have to say the 3-5 at the front are within a few tenths of each other on laps.
     
  13. rexrcr

    rexrcr Formula 3
    Rossa Subscribed

    Nov 27, 2002
    1,578
    Kalamazoo, MI
    Full Name:
    Rob Schermerhorn
    Not true. Load transfer (weight transfer) in a corner is a function of track width and CG height, nothing more. Raising (or moving it in any direction) the roll center just changes the percent of load transferred to the tires/road via the spring/damper and via the suspension control arms/upright/hub, and of course, modifies the suspension geometry changes in bump and rebound relative to static ride height.

    One will always have weight transfer. In fact, design the roll center high enough, and the car will camber into the corner looking like a bike, it’s been done, usually by mistake.

    BTW, you’re correct in stating raising the front ride height does not place additional weight on the rear axle. And agreed, the improvement in cornering is due to geometry changes/ changes in how the driver sensing the chassis accelerations, changes to camber gain, etc.
     
  14. mfennell70

    mfennell70 Formula Junior

    Nov 3, 2003
    597
    Middletown, NJ
    I agree that overall weight transfer remains the same but relative roll centers affect how that transfer is distributed front to rear. Beyond that, the specifics get sketchy and the more I read, the more I see that I should just keep my mouth shut. :)
     

Share This Page