Short velocity stacks - cross post from Classic | FerrariChat

Short velocity stacks - cross post from Classic

Discussion in 'Technical Q&A' started by snj5, Feb 5, 2005.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    #1 snj5, Feb 5, 2005
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    While this was brought up in the classic section, thought it may have some audience here.

    Today's project was installing a set of durable1 short velocity stacks. Workmanship/fit is quite good. Pretty dang inexpensive mod I couldn't resist trying and obviously easy to do. Of course, now must be EXTRA careful not to drop a nut down the carb.
    On just a quick test spin, it does feel as if it's spinning faster above 5K. It's like it gets faster, faster - i.e the accell rate is noticibly improved seat of the pants up high with perhaps a little throttle response lost however in the 2500 - 3500 range (air column velocity?). Still very streetable, but a little less umph to me feeling like the Kjet throttle response. Very good, but not instantaneous down low as with the taller air horns.
    Will try to dyno sometime, although Durable1 has a pre/post dyno that kinda confirms a top end improvement of about 10 hp, which is what you would expect anyway with shorter velocity stacks. Feels like it does improve high end breathing seat of the pants. A good mod for the high rpm (>5K) performance. Cheap, too.

    Hope this is interesting to some; more later if anyone's interested. No connection, yada, yada.

    best
    rt
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  2. jjstecher

    jjstecher Formula Junior

    Jan 21, 2002
    962
    Rochester Minnesota
    Full Name:
    John Stecher
    Looks good Kermit has really done a good job.
     
  3. don_xvi

    don_xvi F1 Rookie

    Nov 1, 2003
    2,934
    Outside Detroit
    Full Name:
    Don the 16th
    Ooh, that's a hot looking toaster you have!

    LOLL so early in the morning! Just back up to watch more Daytona coverage...
     
  4. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    Yes - it runs on 'carbs' as well... :)
     
  5. thecarreaper

    thecarreaper F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Sep 30, 2003
    18,120
    Savannah
    hey Russ, someone with ferrari skills has instructed me that TALL stacks were put on race cars for a reason, and that shorter ones than stock would have a bad effect. geeze, now i am confused.

    dyno testing will put this to rest, but could someone explain to me the pros and cons of how these 2 styles affect airflow? i am seriously considering buying a set of these and going with 135 mains. i have individual open aircleaners. the stock airbox is in the damn way all the time, whereas the individual ones seem to allow more air, more sound from the carbs, and you can work on the car around them. tall stacks are out of the question, so whats the advantage of the small ones. help? :)
     
  6. Birdman

    Birdman F1 Veteran

    Jun 20, 2003
    6,689
    North shore, MA
    Full Name:
    THE Birdman
    As I understand it, the short stacks were developed because the tall stacks don't have much space above them with the stock airbox, so the airflow isn't as good as it could be. If you are using individual air filters, you might not need them....not sure.

    Birdman
     
  7. thecarreaper

    thecarreaper F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Sep 30, 2003
    18,120
    Savannah
    #7 thecarreaper, Feb 6, 2005
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017

    makes sense, and i bet the individual aircleaners have the same amount of space or less :( . i am guessing that the short stacks are designed to smooth airflow and minimize the turbulance caused by going thru and over the stock stacks.
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  8. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    An oversimplified way that I was taught was that longer flow horns tend to move the powerband down the rev range, increase low end torque and provide higher air velocities which sharpen throttle response - but they do relatively add resistance to top end flow. Shorter stacks are less resistance to high flow, and give increased top end, but at lower rpm ranges the velocities are lower dulling throttle response relatively. There are other factors of course (pulse tuning, cam profile and reversion, etc), but this is a short story.

    Something that has borne out in my dyno experience and that has been talked about on the Alfa boards (www.alfabb.com) is that Webers like a good amount of space above the air entrance to give good high end flow. This is the primary advantage of these short air horns in the somewhat restictive stock Ferrari air box. You may lose some low end throttle response (lower velocities) but gain quite a bit up high. As you can see in the dyno posted in the other thread*, these jewels were worth 12 RWHP at the upper end on a chassis dyno. Subjective seat of the pants eval (or self expectational delusion) seems to bear this out on a short drive yesterday - will try to better quantify later..

    best
    rt

    * http://ferrarichat.com/forum/showthread.php?t=47676
     
  9. Harta320

    Harta320 Karting

    Nov 6, 2003
    169
    Sarasota, FL
    Full Name:
    Bill Smith
    I believe the reason for the short stacks is so that you can get full air flow without breathing hot engine bay air.
     
  10. Sean F.

    Sean F. F1 Rookie

    Feb 4, 2003
    3,067
    Kansas
    Full Name:
    Sean F
    His dyno sheet shows improvement all the way up the rev. range.
     

Share This Page