real-time A/F analysis of carb hard turn mixture leanness | FerrariChat

real-time A/F analysis of carb hard turn mixture leanness

Discussion in 'Technical Q&A' started by snj5, Sep 6, 2005.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    #1 snj5, Sep 6, 2005
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    While I am tweaking the carb jetting, thought I would post this real time Air Fuel mixture plot of a highway on ramp, with a hard turn-in generating mixture leaness corrected by coming on throttle correcting with the accellerator pump.
    So, when under corner load, apply throttle for constant power. :)
    Hope this is interesting for some
    Back to tweaking...
    rt

    For those hard core carb guys, jetting was: 135;F24;190;53idle;60accel;36mm with K&N, Durable1 short air horns, stock airbox
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  2. chrismorse

    chrismorse Formula 3

    Feb 16, 2004
    2,150
    way north california
    Full Name:
    chris morse
    Russ,

    Some time ago, i bought the LM-1 meter and have not had a chance to work with it - you know, up to your armpits in aligators...
    What other goodies, beyond the basic unit are you using to get the time & rpm plot versus the af ratio.
    I was speculating that you must be real busy, in that hard turn, trying to copy down all that info.
    Great info, keep it coming.

    thanks,
    chris
     
  3. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    this is all just the basic kit - i really wish i had gotten the rpm plot now;
    it's like you can do a real world rolling dyno - if you know that the A/F is right on a real world road pull, you have a max tuned set up

    Wonder how much the rpm sensor is now?
     
  4. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    Does anyone out there have any AF charts or data for just on the real world road driving? I do not really have a benchmark to compare.
    Many thanks
     
  5. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    #5 snj5, Sep 7, 2005
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Transition tuning

    I do think that the main jet and a/c are on for hard use above 3500 according to the dyno graph below with A/Fs near 13 for hard pulls - the dip you see early on the dyno is obviously the accell jet firing. The problem is the transition circuit (isn't it always). A transient leaness that occurs with small throttle openings around 3500 (that can be over come by larger movements firing the a-pump) might be addressed by a richer idle/transition jet above the 53's I have now or decrease the venturi slightly to 34mm from 36mm to gain some air velocity. You can watch the intermittant transition leaness from small throttle openings on the LM-1 graph.
    The pump shot at 60 even though large, does not cover the transition leaness unless large throttle movements are used. Since it does not cover the transition leaness, you could also make a case that the pump jet could be smaller as it takes the A/F pretty near 10 sometimes on accelleration. As Mitch Alsup notes, the transition is a bit lean in spikes, but catches up suggesting to me a possible velocity problem; low load/rpm (e.g cruise, slow speed) is still rich. It is here I am tempted to swap the F24 ets for the F36 ets. The two emulsion tubes are shown side by side.

    So, in summary I am thinking of:
    1. increase the idle/transition jets from 53 to 57 to cover the transition leaness
    2. Go back to 34mm venturis to increase the velocity
    3. Decrease the pump size from 60 to 40 to not drown the mixture on heavy throttle
    4.Go to F36 et tubes, but would need to watch the new top end A/F

    All advice welcome everyone
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  6. don_xvi

    don_xvi F1 Rookie

    Nov 1, 2003
    2,934
    Outside Detroit
    Full Name:
    Don the 16th
    Two words:

    "Fuel Injection"

    This is why! :)
     
  7. chrismorse

    chrismorse Formula 3

    Feb 16, 2004
    2,150
    way north california
    Full Name:
    chris morse
    MrJablowme,

    There is absolutely no doubt, none whatsever, that FI is THE ANSWER to Max horsepower and torque, driveability and mileage, (and probably lower maintenance costs as well).

    BUT,

    You need to come up with the bucks, ($3000 - $5000 ???), for a current state of the art system and either go through the learning curve, (lots of time), or pay someone, (lots of $), to install and set up your system.

    I, and perhaps others, are longing for a more simple and direct experience with their cars.

    I believe it is a personal choice we all make, as to how and to what extent we want to be involved with our cars, how far we are willing/able to modify them, how much $$$ we are willing/able to allocate to optimizing our beloved cars.

    As for me, I will stay with the carbs, try to bring some maintenance things current, like ignition, wheels, tires, brakes and try to stay on top of the maintenance.

    my .02 cents,
    chris
     
  8. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    I spoke with Gron today at Pierce; He agreed mostly with theory that there is a hole between transition and main jet coming in. When told what I was running, he stated that my main circuit was not coming in soon enough leaving a hole. When told of my venturi and main jet size, he said that could be part of the problem, as a 36 mm venturi needed about a 145 main jet to start flowing soon enough. What he suggested was to go to a 145 main to see if that brought the main circuit in sooner, and consider going back down to a 34mm venturi to increase the air velocity if the hole was still there. He relayed an almost exactly similar experience on a hot cammed 356, where you went up on the main jet, then backed off on the idle/transition.
    Will try it tomorrow, but may cheat and drop a 210 a/c on top to adjust the top end. It sure seems that a 145 with an F24 is pretty darn lot of gas!

    more soon
    rt
     
  9. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    #9 snj5, Sep 8, 2005
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Son of a gun - it worked!!!!!
    Gron at Pierce Manifolds was right.

    Went up to a 145 main (F24;210;53) and you could feel the main circuit come in earlier, filling the previous lean spot!! Clinically, the flat spot is about 80% gone - if you try hard you can induce it sometimes a little, if you are looking for it, but the anoying recurrent flat spot at 3500 - 3800 rpm 5th gear cruise is GONE. I almost don't believe it. I am now tempted to ever back off on the idle/transition from 53 to 50 to lean out the low end cruise richness of the mid/low 12s. the other temptation is to go back to a 34mm venturi which would lower the transition to the main circuit a couple of hundred rpm, but the current improvement is amazing. While slow throttle opening before poked a hole to 17, now it just hits 15 and the main kicks in, you really do not feel it.
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  10. bill308

    bill308 Formula 3
    Silver Subscribed

    May 13, 2001
    1,225
    Windsor, CT
    Full Name:
    Bill Sebestyen
    Russ,

    Good job in monitoring the A/F ratio.

    I'm conservative when it comes to carburation. To me, driveability is most important. I would be willing to give up some top end for over all driveability. I guess what i'm suggesting is to try the smaller venturies and spend some time dialing them in. The larger vacuum depression of the smaller venturies should bring the mains in sooner.

    Bill
     

Share This Page