Study reveals huge U.S. oil-shale field | FerrariChat

Study reveals huge U.S. oil-shale field

Discussion in 'Other Off Topic Forum' started by whiteeclipse, Oct 18, 2005.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. whiteeclipse

    whiteeclipse Karting

    Aug 18, 2005
    119
    Central Florida
    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002463368_oilstudy01.html

    WASHINGTON — The United States has an oil reserve at least three times that of Saudi Arabia locked in oil-shale deposits beneath federal land in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming, according to a study released yesterday.

    But the researchers at the RAND think tank caution the federal government to go carefully, balancing the environmental and economic impacts with development pressure to prevent an oil-shale bust later.

    "We've got more oil in this very compact area than the entire Middle East," said James Bartis, RAND senior policy researcher and the report's lead author. He added, "If we go faster, there's a good chance we're going to end up at a dead end."

    For years, the industry and the government considered oil shale — a rock that produces petroleum when heated — too expensive to be a feasible source of oil.

    However, oil prices, which spiked above $70 a barrel this week, combined with advances in technology could soon make it possible to tap the estimated 500 billion to 1.1 trillion recoverable barrels, the report found.

    The study, sponsored in part by the U.S. Department of Energy, comes about a month after the president signed a new energy policy dramatically reversing the nation's approach to oil shale and opening the door within a few years to companies that want to tap deposits on public lands.

    The report also says oil-shale mining, above-ground processing and disposing of spent shale cause significant adverse environmental impacts. Shell Oil is working on a process that would heat the oil shale in place, which could have less effect on the environment.

    Copyright © 2005 The Seattle Times Company

    Shell stated the oil has to be over $30 a barrel to produce.
     
  2. whiteeclipse

    whiteeclipse Karting

    Aug 18, 2005
    119
    Central Florida
    8 companies apply for BLM oil shale leases

    Friday, September 16, 2005

    By SALLY SPAULDING

    The Daily Sentinel

    The Colorado office of the Bureau of Land Management has received 10 applications from eight companies for its new oil shale leasing program.

    The small-scale leasing program will allow groups to test oil-shale extraction technology in the public lands of Colorado.

    The lease program allows companies to explore the resource, which could produce as much as 2.6 trillion barrels of oil, by granting 160-acre tracts of land and 10 years time to worthy applicants.

    “There are some bigger companies like Shell that have applied, and some of the companies are really small,” said Karen Zurek, acting head of the BLM’s solid minerals division. “Some of them know what they’re doing, and some others probably don’t.”

    All of the applications in Colorado are for land in Rio Blanco County, according to officials with the BLM’s state office.

    Bureau employees said the number of applications was “about what they expected,” but many in the industry were surprised by the turnout.

    “I’m floored that the number of applicants was so small,” said Paul Lerwick of EGL Resources, a company based in Midland, Texas, that applied for a lease.

    Lerwick said the problem may have been the time frame, just 90 days, for companies to complete lease applications.

    The leasing program was announced in June, and the deadline for companies to apply was last week.

    In the application process, a company or group had to include information about its technology and extraction process, prove it could fund operations, post a bond, pay a $2,000 application fee and comply with other bureau restrictions.

    “I know of at least two companies that just threw the towel in (on the application process),” Lerwick said. “Most people in the industry with this current boom are busier than a one-armed paper hanger with natural gas and oil. If you didn’t already have a team working on this, then you were really out of luck.”

    Some companies, however, have continued to follow the industry for years, long after the last oil-shale activity attracted thousands of workers to western Colorado during the late 1970s and early 1980s.

    The boom went bust in May 1982 after Exxon abruptly announced it was closing its oil-shale project because of rising costs.

    Other companies followed suit, and the resulting economic bust lasted almost a decade. Some individuals have been brainstorming new technologies ever since and waiting for a time when oil prices could make the industry viable.

    “Some of our work started 20 years ago,” said William H. Pelton, a partner with Phoenix Wyoming Inc., a Denver-based company that applied for a lease. “This is about a resource in our own back yard, and hopefully this is our chance to develop it. This is one of the things we have been gearing up for.”

    Other companies in the industry have been waiting for a public lands leasing opportunity to present itself.

    Shell Oil Company has tested an in-ground oil-shale process on private land in Rio Blanco County for the past five years.

    Executives with the company said that while the company had made technological progress at the private site, it was important to access federal resources to assess the commercial viability of oil shale.

    The company filed three applications for lease parcels with the BLM as of last week.

    Zurek said some of the applications were “more complete than others” and that a team of employees will be looking at the extraction processes described by the applicants.

    That will take several months, Zurek said, and a complicated environmental assessment process will follow.

    “It will be a while,” she said.

    Companies that have applied for a BLM oil shale lease are:

    Rifle-based Natural Soda, Inc.

    EGL Resources Inc. of Midland, Texas.

    Salt Lake City-based Kennecott Exploration Company.

    Englewood-based Independent Energy Partners.

    Denver-based Phoenix Wyoming, Inc.

    Chevron Shale Oil Company.

    ExxonMobil Corporation.

    Shell Frontier Oil and Gas Inc.
     
  3. Ashman

    Ashman Three Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Sep 5, 2002
    31,680
    MA
    Full Name:
    John
    In the pecking order of non-liquid oil reserves, the tar sands in Alberta rank ahead of shale oil as they are currently producing significant volumes of oil (hundreds of thousands of barrels per day) at a cash cost in the U.S. $10-12/barrel range. Capital costs are high and the oil has a high sulfur content that needs to be treated, but this area has enormous profit potential at current price levels.

    Shale oil technology is good, with the in situ work being done by Shell appearing to be especially promising from both a cost and an environmental perspective. As the article mentioned, a lot of technology development was done in the late 70's and actually continued until about 1986 or so until the U.S. Synthetic Fuels Corporation, the government agency providing subsidies for shale oil development, was disbanded by Congress. I can remember well as a young banker hoping to finance a particular shale oil project and sitting in the office until midnight to learn the outcome of the vote that shut down the U.S. Synfuels program.

    Shale oil is a bit of a longer term investment. You should expect that production at commercial volume levels will take 5 or more years to develop, depending on the market price of oil of course.

    John
     
  4. whiteeclipse

    whiteeclipse Karting

    Aug 18, 2005
    119
    Central Florida
    Canada has invested heavy into their tar sand technology which are producing 1 million barrels of oil per day from tar sands and that is expected to reach 2 million barrels a day.

    Shell has said commercial oil shale production should be around 2010 and as long as the oil stays above $30 a barrel.
     
  5. Tspringer

    Tspringer F1 Veteran

    Apr 11, 2002
    6,155
    Synthetic oil production is nothing new. Germany got over 80% of its oil in the late war years in synthetic production from coal... over 60 years ago.

    Oil can be produced from coal but its only economically viable at over $30 per barrell of oil. Given that it seems oil is unlikely to ever go under that number again, at least not for any extended period, it would seem such synthetic production would pick up steam.

    BUT...... environmental law prevents this. There is a huge and well funded lobby in this nation that would rather have us all revert to the horse and buggy than increase fossil fuel production.



    Terry
     
  6. Ashman

    Ashman Three Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Sep 5, 2002
    31,680
    MA
    Full Name:
    John

    Yep, same nimrods that have stifled new oil production fields in and near the U.S. and have prevented any hope of constructing any new oil refineries in the past 20 years.

    Then, when the amount of oil we import increases in order to keep up with demand, including fuel for limousines and gulfstream jets, they cry for someone to do something about our dependence on foreign oil.

    The truth is that the U.S. and Canada combined have massive reserves of energy contained in coal, tar sands and oil shale, not to mention untapped reserves of oil and natural gas. Many of those reserves were not economic when oil prices were lower but at current price levels they not only can produce energy at lower cost than market prices of oil, but they offer the promise of a decent return on the investment needed to develop those reserves as well.

    If developed properly these reserves can supply most, if not all, of the energy needs in North America for decades.

    John
     
  7. jimpo1

    jimpo1 Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Jul 30, 2001
    24,520
    Dallas, TX
    Full Name:
    Jim E
    So, Shell oil is working on oil shale. Somehow seems appropriate.
     
  8. Robin

    Robin F1 Rookie

    Nov 1, 2003
    2,931
    Arlington, VA
    Sounds like Shell will sell shale soon. Should Saudis stress?

    -R
     
  9. TexasF355F1

    TexasF355F1 Six Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Feb 2, 2004
    69,106
    Cloud-9
    Full Name:
    Jason
     
  10. RacerX_GTO

    RacerX_GTO F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Nov 2, 2003
    14,003
    Oregon
    Full Name:
    Gabe V.
    Saudi's stress? Nah, but a really cool side effect occurs to the price of most everything when players in the petroleum market compete for business.

    Not just the economy, but humans as well, people need heating oil during sub zero temperatures to keep warm, but are told to "conserve" and with short supply, prices climb in the stratosphere. Oil is an energy source which sustains life, there is abundant supplies of it to go around in this ever growing country. The demand is there. We have got to tear down these enviro obstructions first.
     
  11. ferrarigtofan

    ferrarigtofan Formula Junior
    BANNED

    Sep 26, 2005
    510
    USA
    Did you see Bill Maher this week where he said something like "Its like God giving you a garden and you refuse to strip mine it"? Saudi oil is under sand, no wear to the earth's surface to extract.
     
  12. jimpo1

    jimpo1 Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Jul 30, 2001
    24,520
    Dallas, TX
    Full Name:
    Jim E
    They should show sharp shysters the shining shale to insure surrounding states sales are secure.
     
  13. XJARGH!

    XJARGH! Rookie

    Feb 29, 2004
    43
    Los Angeles, CA
    Full Name:
    Tim
    Silly simpletons, soon Shell's significant shale stock sales should stop stupid saudi stuff surreptitiously shilling sound studies!
     
  14. Tspringer

    Tspringer F1 Veteran

    Apr 11, 2002
    6,155


    You spent days coming up with that didnt you?




    Terry
     
  15. Robin

    Robin F1 Rookie

    Nov 1, 2003
    2,931
    Arlington, VA
    Nice :)

    Seriously though, any thoughts on the implications of us becoming more self sufficient in the oil biz? While I know the long term benefits are there, it's my understanding that the Saudis are investing heavily in the US and consistently buy up a rather large percentage of our debt. If we gave SA the FU, what's to stop them from cashing out? Would we be hosed in the short term?

    I have little to no understanding of these things, but it would seem to me that reducing dependency on foreign oil will be a bit trickier than simply digging up Colorado, forcing GM to make electric cars, and saying buh-bye to OPEC.

    -R
     

Share This Page