FIA presents new rules for 2008 | Page 2 | FerrariChat

FIA presents new rules for 2008

Discussion in 'Other Racing' started by F1racer, Dec 21, 2005.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Koby

    Koby Formula 3

    Dec 14, 2003
    2,307
    The Borough, NJ
    Full Name:
    Jason Kobies
    I don't know what to think anymore. On one hand the current sport needs to be fixed, it often too boring and the costs are just silly. On the other hand as a friend of mine pointed out, if I wanted to watch Formula BMW, I would. So it is a question of balance, and that said these proposed changes are very sweaping and cut deep into what many consider the heart of F1.

    If it was up to me I would ditch most of the current tech that is staus quo and therefore does nothing for the show but runs up costs, but I wouldn't place so many limits on future development.
     
  2. Remy Zero

    Remy Zero Two Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 26, 2005
    23,478
    KL, Malaysia
    Full Name:
    MC Cool Breeze
    holy crap....i'd like to see what happens after monaco...where there's thousands of gear changes involved durin the whoel race
     
  3. Dubai Vol

    Dubai Vol Formula 3

    Aug 12, 2005
    1,418
    back in Dubai
    Full Name:
    Scot Danner
    Just a random comment: one of the reasons for various components to last multiple races is the fact that a gearbox, for example, designed to last one race, is at the end of its design life 19 times in a season. If it has to last 4 races it is at the end of its design life 4 times a season. Parts are designed on their expected life. Personally, I'd like to see engine blocks, cranks, and rods required to last a full year, among other things. And if my street trannt can last hundreds of thousands of miles, why can't F1 gears be designed to last all year? No reason at all, IMO.
     
  4. KTG

    KTG Formula Junior

    May 16, 2005
    820
    Chicago,IL
    I can only laugh....Untill someone creates a new series, I will see you guys at the next vintage race!
     
  5. jknight

    jknight F1 Veteran

    Oct 30, 2004
    7,821
    Central Texas
    Let's hear it for the cows - cow manure to power F1! The fuel is to be comprised of 6% biological material. I always thought of F1 being the pinnacle of the motor world; however, I can go not to far up I-35 to Carl's Corner and buy Willie Nelson's bio-fuel at the truck stop!!

    Carol
     
  6. Pagani16

    Pagani16 Formula 3

    Apr 25, 2005
    1,325
    SoCal(San Diego)
    Full Name:
    Jason T.
    I think the new rules will force teams to spend even more money in the off season making sure they have the most efficient engine and bodywork since they will no longer be able to make multiple changes during the season. So in the long run it's not really cost effective.
     
  7. bigodino

    bigodino F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Apr 29, 2004
    13,198
    The Netherlands
    Full Name:
    Peter den Biggelaar
    Count me in! On top of that most vintage racecars are nicer to watch too IMHO.

    Ciao, Peter
     
  8. judge4re

    judge4re F1 World Champ

    Apr 26, 2003
    13,477
    Never home
    Full Name:
    Dr. Dumb Ass
    Why don't they just paint a bunch of F3000 cars in different colors and be done with it?
     
  9. bigodino

    bigodino F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Apr 29, 2004
    13,198
    The Netherlands
    Full Name:
    Peter den Biggelaar
    You mean A1 GP? ;-)
     
  10. joker57676

    joker57676 Two Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 12, 2005
    23,767
    Sin City
    Full Name:
    Deplorie McDeplorableface
    Will any of this ever really reduce costs?? Because everytime they change the rules millions of dollars go into research and development to abide by whatever they decide this week. Plus you have to think, if you have $400 million to spend, wont you find some way to spend it. I mean will teams like Ferrari, Honda, Toyota, ect actually reduce what they spend or will they find other ways to spend it....ie like on new wind tunnels, better facilities, more compture simulations, or in Ferraris case they could just test that much more. Just my thoughts.

    Mark
     
  11. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,787
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    You're quite right:

    I agree that any rule change basically leads to more R&D to get the max out of the new rule. So no, this will not really reduce costs.

    I read an interview with one of the top teams and they basically made your point: There is a budget and it will get eaten up by the end of the year regardless. They said exactly what you said: Spend it on something else if you really save in one area.
     
  12. Pagani16

    Pagani16 Formula 3

    Apr 25, 2005
    1,325
    SoCal(San Diego)
    Full Name:
    Jason T.
    Two type‘s of teams will always exist in F1 those with the big money and those without and it sucks for some fan’s when you root for the underdog.
     

Share This Page