Ultra Tech: Would A Torsion Shock Improve Ride/Handling? | FerrariChat

Ultra Tech: Would A Torsion Shock Improve Ride/Handling?

Discussion in 'Technical Q&A' started by No Doubt, Jul 6, 2006.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. No Doubt

    No Doubt Seven Time F1 World Champ

    May 21, 2005
    72,740
    Vegas+Alabama
    Full Name:
    Mr. Sideways
    #1 No Doubt, Jul 6, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Would A Torsion Shock Improve Ride/Handling?

    There are lots of advances in shocks such as the Corvette/Ferrari magnetohelic real-time adjustable ride control, but not much has been done for springs.

    In homes, older garage doors once used "Torsion" springs. These springs would use 1 horizontal, perpendicular spring to aid in lifting/lowering the door.

    New homes now instead use 2 horizontal, parallel springs to perform the same task...strikingly similar to the current coil over shock setup in use by Ferrari and most other sports/race car players today.

    But which is better for ride and/or handling?

    Has any manufacturer ever considered using the perpendicular torsion spring setup instead of coil over shock?

    Pics shown below for consideration and comment.
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  2. LMPDesigner

    LMPDesigner F1 Rookie
    Silver Subscribed

    Nov 5, 2003
    3,210
    Atlanta Georgia
    To make it simple-A spring is a spring is a spring. All springs are simple energy storage devices, the amount of energy stored is a function of material type, material volume and to a degree-the shape/design of the spring. But the shape of the spring is not the critical factor for energy storage. The shape comes from other issues, such as packaging.

    A standard coil spring, if unwrapped starts becoming a pretty equivalent torsion bar. (The are both functionally identical, only packaged differently.)

    The standard coil spring works pretty well for cars, but the torsion bar is used quite frequently in F1 nowadays-but this is purely a packaging issue, not due to any superiority in energy stoarage.

    The type of spring has no influence on ride/handling.
     
  3. No Doubt

    No Doubt Seven Time F1 World Champ

    May 21, 2005
    72,740
    Vegas+Alabama
    Full Name:
    Mr. Sideways
    Thanks. Interesting that F1 uses the torsion spring. I was unaware of that use.

    Would the horizontal torsion spring send excess movement in a different (say, 90 degree) direction than would a vertical coil over shock?

    Would the horizontal torsion spring impact ride height changes differently than would the vertical coil over shock?
     
  4. No Doubt

    No Doubt Seven Time F1 World Champ

    May 21, 2005
    72,740
    Vegas+Alabama
    Full Name:
    Mr. Sideways
    Also, what would be the impact (hopefully not the car into a wall!) on handling of replacing the solid half-shafts with moving coil over shocks?
     
  5. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,812
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    My machine book is at work, but it I recall correctly, a coil spring is the best for energy storage per lb, a leaf spring the worst.....I just don't where remember a torsion spring falls, although intuitively I'd guess about the same as a coil.

    A torsion spring can easily be mounted along the bottom of the chassis, lowering the center of mass, but requiring the chassis to carry the load over a relatively large area, requiring a stronger chassis. I'd have to do some math, but a torsion spring probably has an unsprung weight advantage in that about 1/2 the mass of a coil spring is unsprung weight and moves with the wheel. A torsion spring doesn't translate, but does have a rotational inertia term that would generate some effective unsprung weight, but since the diameter is small, my guess is that it's a significantly lower number than a coil spring.

    But as you said, normally it just comes down to cost and packaging.
     
  6. JCR

    JCR F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Mar 14, 2005
    11,041
    H-Town, Tejas
    Chrysler used torsion bar suspension into the 1970s. Of course it was used on the old VW Beetles. Former Porsche engineer Jobst Brandt has written somewhere in here http://yarchive.net/car/index.html that torsion bar suspension is only appropriate for amored vehicles (military) and not automobiles.
     
  7. smg2

    smg2 F1 World Champ
    Sponsor

    Apr 1, 2004
    16,467
    Dumpster Fire #31
    Full Name:
    SMG
    i just thumbed through my machine book and for cars of street weight it's not what i'd call a viable option. the leangth and wire dia needed would offset the supposed gains. then you have the inner support rod that needs to mount to the chassis. for F1 there low weight and exotic materails allow for the design. for an automotive set-up i'd probable use right/left wound for either side of the control arm, however that can be costly to manufacture.
     
  8. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,812
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    I'm not sure I understand this one. Torsion bars have been and still are used on everything from VW bugs to 5000 lb Cadilacs and pick-up trucks. Coil springs are easier to mount and easier to keep friction/stiction low than with torsion bars. I'm not sure which has a weight advantage...I'd guess coils if compared to solid torsion bars, but torsion bars if hollow bars are used. I'm pretty sure a well designed torsion bar set-up would have the lower upsprung weight, but I'm not so sure that's true with the stuff I've seen in on production street cars...cadilacs and trucks which use(d) massive lower conrtol arms to transmit the torque loads.
     
  9. smg2

    smg2 F1 World Champ
    Sponsor

    Apr 1, 2004
    16,467
    Dumpster Fire #31
    Full Name:
    SMG
    i thought you guys are talking about torsion springs! that's what garage doors use. it seemed odd to me that one would want a torsion spring for a car.
     
  10. smg2

    smg2 F1 World Champ
    Sponsor

    Apr 1, 2004
    16,467
    Dumpster Fire #31
    Full Name:
    SMG
    for those not faimilar with torsion 'bars'
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torsion-bar

    the problem is the stress is from bending not torsion for torsion springs, a torsion bar is resisting the 'twist' a torsion spring is un-coiling if you will. different design and different again from a coil spring.

    so re-cap:
    cars use torsion 'bars', and some valve train assy use torsion 'springs'
     
  11. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,812
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    Yes, quite right....

    and there are have been valve trains that use torsion bars.
     
  12. smg2

    smg2 F1 World Champ
    Sponsor

    Apr 1, 2004
    16,467
    Dumpster Fire #31
    Full Name:
    SMG
    i've always been intrigued by the various desmodronic versions for the valves, i'll see if i can dig up the dwg showing them all.
     
  13. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,812
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    aah yes, the no springs at all trick....well I guess it's actually a form or torsion spring or bar because I think the return cam runs at less then zero clearance causing flex in the return mechanism.....which means it's acting as a spring I guess.
     

Share This Page