Ferrari F1 team under scrutiny for illegal underbody | Page 2 | FerrariChat

Ferrari F1 team under scrutiny for illegal underbody

Discussion in 'F1' started by tifosi12, Mar 19, 2007.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. classic308

    classic308 F1 Veteran

    Jan 9, 2004
    6,820
    Westchester, NY
    Full Name:
    Paul
    yes, but one race and preseason testing make it far too early to judge who's better...
     
  2. Remy Zero

    Remy Zero Two Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 26, 2005
    23,478
    KL, Malaysia
    Full Name:
    MC Cool Breeze
    i think FIA now is full of ****. everything is a 'no' to them. Andreas...would u mind contesting for the next FIA president? :D then, we'll see real racing :D
     
  3. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,791
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    They started their F1 careers in 2001 and 2002 respectively.
     
  4. 62 250 GTO

    62 250 GTO F1 Veteran

    Jan 9, 2004
    7,765
    Nova Scotia Canada
    Full Name:
    Neil
    I think he's just talking about the Ferrari chapter.
     
  5. LightGuy

    LightGuy Four Time F1 World Champ

    Oct 4, 2004
    46,160
    Texas
    Full Name:
    David
    Bump
     
  6. Etcetera

    Etcetera Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 7, 2003
    24,294
    Full Name:
    C6H14O5
    Ron's issue here is that the front splitter is mounted on a springed device that allows the splitter to move a bit when someone prangs a curb. This device was questioned last year and passed scrutiny.

    Ron should open a vineyard with all his sour grapes.
     
  7. tonyc

    tonyc Formula 3

    Oct 19, 2003
    1,674
    Monterey, CA
    Full Name:
    Tony C
    This rules should be thrown out since it is arbitrary. It goes to much into the "intent" of the rule. The rules should be clear and specific. If a team has an advantage because of R&D good for them, the other teams will copy and get the technology for "free". If the FIA does not like it, they can make a new specific rule for the following year.

    I bet if they applied enough pressure on a body part they could get it to flex and DQ a car. I can imagine them using it if a team was too far in the points lead early in the season.
     
  8. Mr Payne

    Mr Payne F1 Rookie

    Jan 8, 2004
    2,878
    Bakersfield, CA
    Full Name:
    Payne
    Didn't he simply ask if his team could also do this?
     
  9. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,791
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    I'd like to throw out the entire rule that aerodynamic devices aren't allowed to move. This was introduced to prevent havoc from the literally high flying rear wings in the late sixties.

    Technology has evolved since then and with it engineering and development in materials. F1 wants to be the leader in technology and guide the car industry's development. Well on an Enzo we have moving aerodynamic devices, so it is about time F1 follows suit.
     
  10. classic308

    classic308 F1 Veteran

    Jan 9, 2004
    6,820
    Westchester, NY
    Full Name:
    Paul
    Porsche street cars from the 964 onward have had the rising rear spoiler for years, and Alfa on the old 90 had a front spoiler that moved downward when a certain amount of air pressure was applied.
     
  11. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,791
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    All the more reasons to allow it for F1.
     
  12. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,791
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    Massa announced that they will use the cars in the same specs as in Melbourne:

    http://www.formula1.com/race/news/5884/771.html

    Is Massa not telling the whole truth or did the FIA take a step back?
     
  13. spirot

    spirot F1 World Champ

    Dec 12, 2005
    15,183
    Atlanta
    Full Name:
    Tom Spiro
    This kind of thinking is whats making F-1 less F-1 like!

    Its not just about the best driver, but both Car & Driver.... if you take all the technology out of the sport, its no better than CART / IRL.. almost all of these current F-1 Drivers have only experienice in carts, and maybe F3, F3000 etc... but mostly just Carts...

    at least Schumacher raced sports cars, and other formulae ( not much ) to prove that he is indeed a "driver".... I dont buy that todays drivers dont have the time to race in other forms of racing... they just dont want to... and I think they are the poorer for it.

    Best driver ever??? Mario Andretti... he raced in it all, and won in it all! not many other drivers can say that... Moss, Clark, Stewart, Senna, have all wone in other forms of racing... Senna barely... todays drivers???? cant think of anyone winning in anything other than Carts, or smaller open wheel... feeding F-1...
     
  14. Remy Zero

    Remy Zero Two Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 26, 2005
    23,478
    KL, Malaysia
    Full Name:
    MC Cool Breeze
    i think what massa meant was actually running the car w/out the lastest mods on it ie aero mods, etc.
     
  15. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,791
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    “The car we will race in Malaysia is the same as the one we raced in Australia, with nothing new,” Massa told Ferrari’s official website.

    Doesn't sound like it, does it?
     
  16. Remy Zero

    Remy Zero Two Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 26, 2005
    23,478
    KL, Malaysia
    Full Name:
    MC Cool Breeze
    pretty odd.

    but one thing tho. Nick mentioned today, that BMW aren't modifying it's floors. so i guess, FIA has taken a step back after all. Kimster also said that he's unconcerned about the F2007. he said that the car is perfectly legal.
     
  17. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,791
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    Well I guess the FIA has to be somewhat reasonable: You don't just "cook" an entire new underbody with a couple of weeks notice. This would be quite a significant change so I think the FIA might just give them some deadline, like e.g. the first European race.

    The whole mass damper story last summer dragged on for weeks and months until they were officially banned etc.
     
  18. Remy Zero

    Remy Zero Two Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 26, 2005
    23,478
    KL, Malaysia
    Full Name:
    MC Cool Breeze
    good point. i wonder whats their whole point then. guess RD will be carrying his moody face around this weekend :)
     
  19. Etcetera

    Etcetera Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 7, 2003
    24,294
    Full Name:
    C6H14O5
    It's not the whole floor. It's the method in which the front splitter is attached with a spring that allows it to absorb impact energy when it hits a curb.

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v691/Ajacied/7.jpg

    Ferrari, Honda, BMW and Renault have removed the spring from the splitter for this weekend's race.
     
  20. dretceterini

    dretceterini F1 Veteran

    Apr 28, 2004
    7,289
    Etceterini Land
    Full Name:
    Dr.Stuart Schaller
    Can someone say "movable aerodynamic device"??
     
  21. Etcetera

    Etcetera Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 7, 2003
    24,294
    Full Name:
    C6H14O5
    We'll have to wait and see if it really was a cheat or if it was what they said it was.

    I'd wager that it is what they said it was (spring to allow the device to soak up curb impact).

    If Ferrari are still 1 second ahead of Mclaren during the next race, then we'll know.
     
  22. ingegnere

    ingegnere F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Sep 12, 2004
    5,567
    Montreal
    #47 ingegnere, Apr 6, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Unless it's made from unobtainium, everything is flexible and therefore moves. That's why the FIA test for flexibility of aero devices.

    The amount of crap that has been written on this subject is incredible - and this by people who have no clue what they're talking about, but just interested in reporting a good story.

    People who suggest that the floor will move up at speed, when the function of a splitter and the underbody of an F1 car, in general, is to create downforce don't even understand the aero principles of an F1 car.

    The people who suggest that the floor moves down and "stalls the flow" (although according to the design submission from McLaren and rejected by the FIA - using a preloaded spring - this could not happen) are ignoring a couple of facts:

    - Creating an unsteady flow and level of downforce makes for an unstable car
    - Splitter moving down would have to also bend the wooden regulation skid block down and would risk wearing this down resulting in possible DQ.

    Maybe the device is just there to limit deflection of the splitter if going over a curb as everyone is saying - but then, that doesn't make a good story.
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  23. Etcetera

    Etcetera Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 7, 2003
    24,294
    Full Name:
    C6H14O5

Share This Page