FIA Investigation Results | Page 6 | FerrariChat

FIA Investigation Results

Discussion in 'Other Racing' started by Ney, Jul 26, 2007.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Tifoso1

    Tifoso1 F1 Rookie

    Nov 18, 2003
    2,606
    Pacific NW
    Full Name:
    Anthony C.
    Right, and then no one at McLaren, RD especially, will be able to deny knowing anything about being in possession of the Ferrari docuements. Keep in mind, as it stands now, McLaren is ONLY quilty of in possession of confidential information and docuements from Ferrari. That' all, no big deal. Group hug everyone!!!
     
  2. SRT Mike

    SRT Mike Two Time F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    23,343
    Taxachusetts
    Full Name:
    Raymond Luxury Yacht
    Its not that vague...

    Either McLaren was willing to use the documents or they were not. They didn't "Just look a little bit". Either we believe the affidavit or we do not. We do know that Coughlan wanted out of McLaren to go to another team for a higher salary, and he was out of F1 as soon as this whole mess started, so what motivation would he have to protect McLaren? If they were complicit in all this, I'd expect him to sell them down the river to save his own hide.

    I don't think anyone at McLaren was looking through the documents with any ideas to steal info (other than Coughlan) and I doubt Coughlan has control over every aspect of the team. He's not Ron Dennis. Just like if a marketing guy goes into the engineering dept and says "I have some input on how to run the fuel strategy", he's not going to sway anyone unless he says "and I got this info from the secret Ferrari documents!" at which point he will stop being listened to, if the team does not want any part of inter-team espionage. And if Coughlan told people about the docs and they didnt want to see them, then suddenly Coughlan comes up with a great new fuel strategy that he pitches to Ron, then a great new suspension set up that he pitches to the lead enginer, etc, it would be pretty obvious what was going on.

    I don't think any of that happened - there is absolutely no proof that it did. Some on here make outlandish ASSumptions and then want to base the penalty on their unproven assumptions (that happen to be very one sided and Ferrari-biased). Gimme a break. The FIA has never been out to get Ferrari (quite the opposite according to most). Nobody within the FIA has a chip on their shoulder against Ferrari and this decision happened because there is NO PROOF that Mac did anything wrong.

    I think there was probably infinitesimal benefit, if any, for McLaren stemming from Coughlans posession of the documents.
     
  3. SRT Mike

    SRT Mike Two Time F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    23,343
    Taxachusetts
    Full Name:
    Raymond Luxury Yacht
    tinfoil hat crimping the cranial blood supply? Has to be!
     
  4. boxer frank

    boxer frank Karting

    Sep 30, 2004
    165
    toronto canada
    Full Name:
    FRANK
    chief engineer of the team caught red handed with several hundred pages of their main rivals intellectual property and not even a slap on the wrist for mclaren!!!!!!

    what a slap on the face for ferrari and the many millions of racing fans worldwide

    fia judges should be used to crash test next years chassis with seatbelts on but without a hans

    now all ferrari has to do is start waving money under mclaren employee's noses and just keep everything at their homes

    oh ya ya fia favors ferrari allright

    pinicle of motorsports
     
  5. bill365

    bill365 F1 Rookie

    Nov 3, 2003
    3,319
    Chicago area
    Full Name:
    Bill
    OK Mike,
    When this is put into context, what part do you find so unrealistic?

    That F1 is a money game?

    That Bernie likes money?

    That Mercedes represents a large chunk of F1 money by themselves and by their competitive participation in the circus?

    That I didn't think Mercedes would significantly deprive the V-M-McL team of funding?

    That Mercedes may want to send a management level person to Woking to observe operations, protecting their investment after this blow-up?

    I think your response, is a bit out of scale.
     
  6. pastmaster

    pastmaster Formula Junior

    Feb 5, 2006
    890
    Alma, Michigan USA
    Maybe.

    I don't see Ferrari, saying, OK. We're all friends again, so let's go Racing.

    Let's wait and see. This is just the beginning. The ball is in FERRARI'S COURT.

    Ciao...Paolo
     
  7. boxer frank

    boxer frank Karting

    Sep 30, 2004
    165
    toronto canada
    Full Name:
    FRANK
    rd ""Although I'm not completely comfortable with the outcome, the punishment fits the crime."

    he is still not comfortable with a zero penalty.....well then i guess the only thing that would make him comfortable is if ferrari had points taken away!!!!!!!!!

    even rd admits their is a crime but where oh where is the punishment that he says fits it

    for the love of christ somebody please explain how this guy has become so successful shovelling so much pig**** with a snowshovel
     
  8. Boxer12

    Boxer12 Formula 3

    Jun 1, 2003
    1,672
    F1 is a joke. Its time to fold the tent. Start building cars and engines for Champ Car! Yea!
     
  9. Tifoso1

    Tifoso1 F1 Rookie

    Nov 18, 2003
    2,606
    Pacific NW
    Full Name:
    Anthony C.
    Hey, at least RD didn't scream "Rodney King, Rodney King!!!!!" in the court or accuse Ferrari of entrapment. :)
     
  10. kirill

    kirill Formula Junior

    Jul 8, 2004
    584
    Illinois
    Full Name:
    Kirill
    Do you think the punishement for McLaren should be to hire Stepney ?
     
  11. moretti

    moretti Five Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Nov 1, 2003
    59,756
    Australia
    Full Name:
    John
    HAHAHAHAHA spoken like a true racer Andreas :D

    my tyres are always to blame (it's got nothing to do with the spinning out at turn 3 :D )
     
  12. moretti

    moretti Five Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Nov 1, 2003
    59,756
    Australia
    Full Name:
    John
    very true, he has come down hard on teams before today but I must say I am a little surprised as a 2 race penalty would have seen an evening up of both championships and a lot more interest in the remaining races and Max and Bernie share this great love of money.

    If I remember correctly Max was a motor racing lawyer and Bernie a "reputable" carsalesman .... hmmm the *'devil' or the 'deep blue sea'

    * RD is still lucifer

    I think the right decision was made, now let's see how far this espionage thing can be pushed, JT is sending a team of engineers over to McL with sliderules and CAD machines ... should all be above board according to the FIA, it only violates the sporting code and who said this was a sport ???
     
  13. pastmaster

    pastmaster Formula Junior

    Feb 5, 2006
    890
    Alma, Michigan USA
    ENZO FERRARI.

    How do you think that "Il Commendatore," would have reacted to this FIA Ruling, in his day, and today?

    Ciao...Paolo
     
  14. moretti

    moretti Five Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Nov 1, 2003
    59,756
    Australia
    Full Name:
    John
    actually the old man might just have packed his bags for a couple of races so he could stamp his feet and demand attention like he'd done before
     
  15. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    +1
    And Ferrari sitting out even two races would cost Bernie and the FIA MILLIONS in lost revenue.

    Enzo knew exactly how far he could push, and the FIA never knew how far he might go... :)
     
  16. PSk

    PSk F1 World Champ

    Nov 20, 2002
    17,673
    Tauranga, NZ
    Full Name:
    Pete
    Rather they built a Formula Ford ...

    Pete
     
  17. PhilNotHill

    PhilNotHill Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jul 3, 2006
    27,855
    Aspen CO 81611
    Full Name:
    FelipeNotMassa
    In response to Senna3xWDC that Alonso is NOT UNHAPPY....

    #108 Today, 12:09 AM
    PhilNotHill
    Formula 3
    Silver Subscribed Join Date: Jul 2006
    Location: Aspen CO
    Full Name: Phil
    Posts: 2,039

    ALONSO STILL UNHAPPY AT MCLAREN

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    http://www.f1complete.com/content/view/5478/617/

    Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of guys.
     
  18. PhilNotHill

    PhilNotHill Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jul 3, 2006
    27,855
    Aspen CO 81611
    Full Name:
    FelipeNotMassa
    Drivers could quit McLaren if found guilty
    Thursday 26th July 2007

    Fantasy F1 - Win a trip to Monaco!
    It's not too late, point scoring starts at the Bahrain GP. Click here.

    Lewis Hamilton and Fernando Alonso could both quit McLaren if the team is found guilty of 'fraudulent conduct' in today's FIA hearing.


    McLaren face the FIA's World Motor Sport Council in Paris today to answer charges of having 'unauthorised possession of documents and confidential information belonging to Scuderia Ferrari Marlboro.'


    A great deal rests on the outcome of today's hearing, most notably McLaren's inclusion in this year's World Championship and the team's chances of winning the World title.


    However, it has now emerged that the team also risks the chance of losing both its drivers if found guilty.


    According to the Daily Mail, 'Hamilton's deal with McLaren, like that of team-mate Fernando Alonso, contains a clause allowing him to move to a rival should his "image" be damaged by proved malpractice.'

    COULDN'T HAPPEN TO A NICER BUNCH OF GUYS! :D
     
  19. PhilNotHill

    PhilNotHill Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jul 3, 2006
    27,855
    Aspen CO 81611
    Full Name:
    FelipeNotMassa
    Ferrari furious with McLaren's reprieve

    By Pablo Elizalde Thursday, July 26th 2007, 16:39 GMT


    The Ferrari team have labelled as "incomprehensible" that the FIA has decided not to punish McLaren despite finding them guilty of possession of unauthorised documents.

    The FIA said after the Paris hearing that there was insufficient evidence to prove McLaren had benefited from leaked Ferrari data found at the home of their chief designer Mike Coughlan.

    The governing body said, however, that McLaren were guilty of having breached article 151c of the International Sporting Code.

    "Ferrari notes that Vodafone McLaren Mercedes has been found guilty by the FIA World Council," said the Italian team in a statement.

    "It therefore finds it incomprehensible that violating the fundamental principle of sporting honesty does not have, as a logical and inevitable consequence, the application of a sanction. Today's decision legitimises dishonest behaviour in Formula One and sets a very serious precedent.

    "In fact, the decision of the World Council signifies that possession, knowledge at the very highest level and use of highly confidential information acquired in an illicit manner and the acquiring of confidential information over the course of several months, represent violations that do not carry any punishment.

    "The fact that Vodafone McLaren Mercedes was in possession of such information was discovered totally by accident and, but for this, the team would continue to have it. This is all the more serious as it has occurred in a sport like Formula One in which small details make all the difference.

    "Ferrari feels this is highly prejudicial to the credibility of the sport. It will continue with the legal action already under way within the Italian criminal justice system and in the civil court in England."
     
  20. Ferranki

    Ferranki Formula Junior

    Mar 9, 2007
    773
    Buffalo NY
    Full Name:
    Ken
    First, I was hoping the WMSC meeting would publicly bring to light more of the facts than I’ve heard.......as in any more.

    Second, the WMSC found McLaren guilty of a breach of the rules as stated in 151.c (not Coughlan individually). IMHO either McLaren should have been exonerated completely, or dealt with much more harshly.
     
  21. moretti

    moretti Five Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Nov 1, 2003
    59,756
    Australia
    Full Name:
    John

    would you want to hug Lucifer ?

    RD is only lying while his mouth is open, other than that I believe every word he says :D
     
  22. Chaos

    Chaos Formula 3

    Sep 29, 2004
    2,346
    Cardiff. UK
    Full Name:
    Nick.
    Stepney deserves a lifetime ban - IF its proven he handedover the info (dont forget he says he didnt)

    Coughlin - maybe/maybe not, depends what he says, how he actually got it and what he did with it
     
  23. pastmaster

    pastmaster Formula Junior

    Feb 5, 2006
    890
    Alma, Michigan USA
    In one of the Italian Newspapers;

    Ferrari president Luca di Montezemolo added: "I just want to say to our fans, who are contacting Ferrari from all over the world and who are offended by the decision taken yesterday in Paris, that they can stay calm because this story doesn't end here."

    What would have ENZO FERRARI done?

    More important, what will Luca DO? So we await.

    Ciao...Paolo
     
  24. PhilNotHill

    PhilNotHill Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jul 3, 2006
    27,855
    Aspen CO 81611
    Full Name:
    FelipeNotMassa
    NAStyCar doesn't have any trouble taking away points on a seemingly weekly basis. They are serious about their rules. Which is the only way to run a sport IMVHO. Their attendance and TV coverage seems to be fine. ;)


    F1 are just a bunch of less than perfect humans who need to develop some intestinal fortitude.
     

Share This Page