Bay Area Real Estate and Development | FerrariChat

Bay Area Real Estate and Development

Discussion in 'California & Nevada (Northern)' started by RedBarchetta, Aug 30, 2007.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. RedBarchetta

    RedBarchetta Karting

    Nov 3, 2006
    152
    SF, CA.
    Hello Northern Calif. Community:

    I know this is abit of topic but i was wondering if i could get some brief input and any suggestions you might have.

    I was curious to know if the Bay Area Real Estate market is more stable or even less stable than the Southern Calif market. And i am talking over a long period of time 8-10 yrs not just a few years. It seems to me to be much more stable and consistent than the southern Calif market from what i have watched for several years but of course you guys would have better input and knowledge.

    I am making a serious consideration about moving the the San Francisco area since my sister and her family have been out there for 6-7 years now and love it.

    I have been there many times but never lived in the Bay area but evertime i visit, the hook is set deeper and i feel now might be the correct time since i miss seeing my sister and there are many more oppurtunites there than where i currently live. Plus the 20+ days of 100 degree temps this August has made me realize I can't stand the climate here :)

    I am not looking to buy before i move there, but i just want to make sure the market is consistent and strong even during slight national trends and or corrections. IMHO i feel the area should be the strongest within the state just due to land availablity and a strong population growth into the area. Wrong or correct ??

    Now from what i understand the main commerical/business district is starting to move south along the bay, is this correct ?

    If so, does I-80 from the Bay Bridge cause in future growth concerns ?

    Anyone know the % numbers of vacant commerical space ?

    Is most new development within the city residential or commerical ?

    What types of business is needed out there and what is over saturated ?

    I am gonna go over all this with my bro-in law, but i also thought you guys might have seem different insight.

    Open topic, so please feel free to provide any info that might be useful.

    I have many more questions, but i did not want to overwelm you within the first post :)

    Thanks in advance for info.


    ~Ben
     
  2. ASFJr

    ASFJr Formula Junior

    Oct 11, 2004
    499
    SF, CA & NYC, NY
    Full Name:
    Alfonso Faustino
    Hi, Ben.

    The questions you pose are extremely difficult for me to answer on a macro level; hence, I will give you my own personal experience with the real estate investments I made in the city and county of San Francisco on a micro level.

    I don't know too much about the SoCal real estate market; I keep a studio in BH, off Rodeo Drive, when I'm on film location down there, but I don't own it -- I rent it.

    I own two pieces of property in two high-end real estate districts in San Francisco: Twin Peaks and Nob Hill.

    Twin Peaks House:
    My Twin Peaks house spiked in price in 2001 about 61% growth of the market value in 2001; since then, the growth has been consistent; within the past 6 years, I experienced and average annual growth of 2% - 3% of market value.
    In option stock terms, I'm way-way-in-the-money on this property -- the equity in this house far exceeds the loan and strike price I paid for the house. (My mortgage on this house is about $250k.)

    Nob Hill House:
    I purchased my Nob Hill property in 2001. This is one of the most prime loations in San Francisco. It's located across the street of the Fairmont Hotel and Grace Cathedral and diagonal to the Mark Hopkins. The location is most desirable due to its proximity to any place in the city, historical background, influential residents (present company excluded ;-) ), sites, neighborhood appeal, transportation, and safety.

    I experienced a 55% spike in growth of the market value in 2001. Since then, annual Growth has been steady -- averaging at around 4% per year of market value. I am in-the-money with this house -- the equity in this house exceeds the loan and strike price I paid for the house. (I owe about $700k on this two-unit property.) For an additional $700k, I can remodel this property and raise the market value of the property by a factor of 4. This is my next effort -- next to, of course, planning the purchase of my Lamborghini.

    So, in my experience, the SF real estate market has been good to me, and it has been consistent. Also, in my experience with SF real estate, it seems that when a spike takes place in the market, like the ones I experienced in 2001, that spike holds steady and becomes the new baseline or market comp for that area/house. The only time I recall of being out-of-money was in the late 80s, where the real estate market fell, and my strike price end up being higher than the market value of the property; but, like any other of my long-term investments, I rode it out and waited 10 years for the market to bounce back -- made a profit and got out to make another purchase.

    The negative about SF real estate is that you don't get much for your money by way of square feet. If I purchased outside of SF, I would get more bang for my dollars by way of square feet, with a lot of play money left over to buy another Ferrari or Lamborghini.

    I noticed that the real estate activity is extremely competitive and active when people are in the $660k - $1.5 million range. With properties at $1.5 million and above, the activity slows down a bit, and homes don't move as fast in SF.

    I guess that's because you have at least 70% of San Francisco residents renting, so, as first time home buyers, most renters might have a strike point at around $600k or so.

    SF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
    SF residential development is at a minimum, which is one of the reasons that real estate in SF is high.

    Lots of remodeling to existing properties are taking place but not too much by way of new development. In my Twin Peaks neighborhood, I live on a cliff with the mountains across the street from me.

    Tons of space exist for new homes in Twin Peaks, but my neighbors and I are fighting the development companies. We are in a tough battle with developers right now, and many neighborhoods are fighting new development (e.g., Potrero Hill and Bernal Hts.). Hell, I don't want houses across the street from me because I don't like having curtains on my windows; I like looking at the mountains from my windows without exerting energy to open any curtains.

    Outside of SF, new residential development is more active; hence, housing can be more affordable when compared to SF. Some areas, like Marin County and the Peninsula, residential detached single family dwellings cost more and have more land and square feet than SF, but those counties are few in numbers and more of an exception.

    COMMERCIAL v. RESIDENTIAL SPACES
    Since the demise of the Dot-com days in the Bay Area, SF has more commercial space available.

    BUSINESS
    My background is technology and legal; and, I'm also an entrepreneur. Obviously, high-tech and bio-tech are big here, but I know lots of successful people who made their own paths to success; so, my investment and business practices are more of the Napolean Hill frame of mind.

    Good Luck.
    /s/ Alfonso Faustino
     
  3. xs10shl

    xs10shl Formula 3

    Dec 17, 2003
    2,037
    San Francisco
    If you go back a year to 2000 you can probably adjust your numbers down 25%.
     
  4. ASFJr

    ASFJr Formula Junior

    Oct 11, 2004
    499
    SF, CA & NYC, NY
    Full Name:
    Alfonso Faustino
    Hi, xs10shl.

    That's the reason I made the statement that I will address his questions on a micro level as opposed to a macro level; hence, in my two properties, at the timeframes I mentioned, that was my performance.
     
  5. synchro

    synchro F1 Veteran

    Feb 14, 2005
    9,294
    CHNDLR
    Full Name:
    Scott
    If you have some flexibility in your living location, then I'd suggest moving North of the GGate bridge. I lived in Silicon Valley for 4 years before I moved to the North Coast and enjoy the slower pace of life in there while being just an hour or so away from downtown.
     
  6. synchro

    synchro F1 Veteran

    Feb 14, 2005
    9,294
    CHNDLR
    Full Name:
    Scott
    And prices are dropping like a rock in these surrounding areas
    http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Banking/HomebuyingGuide/HomePriceReport.aspx

    "Best and worst
    The biggest decline was in the Merced, Calif., area. Homes there lost 8.65% of their value over this time last year and 3.76% from the past quarter. Merced's experience underscores Lawler's point: Even with the whiplash correction, Merced prices show growth of nearly 90% in the last five years.

    Runners-up for the biggest decline included the California metro areas in and around Santa Barbara, Stockton, Salinas, Modesto, Yuba City, Sacramento, Santa Rosa, Santa Cruz, San Luis Obispo, Oxnard and Vallejo, and Reno, Nev., in the California orbit. Prices dived in Florida communities in and around Punta Gorda, Sarasota, Cape Coral, Palm Bay, Port St. Lucie and West Palm Beach.

    "
     
  7. fc2

    fc2 F1 Veteran
    Owner

    Nov 2, 2006
    5,263
    Silicon Valley Ca.
    Full Name:
    Frank C.
    Hey Alfonso... nice write-up.

    Frank
     
  8. RedBarchetta

    RedBarchetta Karting

    Nov 3, 2006
    152
    SF, CA.
    Thanks Alfonso for the detailed reply, u answered what i was looking for, plus the "70% " renters is the type of info i was curious about.

    TY
     

Share This Page