Why does the F40 seem so much more desired than the F50? | Page 5 | FerrariChat

Why does the F40 seem so much more desired than the F50?

Discussion in '288GTO/F40/F50/Enzo/LaFerrari' started by GENERAL LEE, Dec 5, 2007.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. MGD416

    MGD416 Formula 3

    Jun 4, 2006
    2,385
    Boston
    Full Name:
    Matt
    theres more, oh so much more
     
  2. 410SA

    410SA F1 Veteran

    Nov 2, 2003
    8,511
    West Coast
    Full Name:
    A
    Wait and see what I can do with the 1:43 scale stuff :)
     
  3. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ
    Sponsor

    May 23, 2006
    57,329
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    I must confess the F50 will age well and its time in the sun will come. Ugly and F50 dont belong on the same page.

    Joe
    www.joesackey.com
     
  4. Senna1994

    Senna1994 F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Nov 11, 2003
    13,163
    Orange County
    Full Name:
    Anthony T
    Alex, your really not considering selling that beautiful F40 and F50 are you?
     
  5. 410SA

    410SA F1 Veteran

    Nov 2, 2003
    8,511
    West Coast
    Full Name:
    A
    I've learned that everything is always for sale. It's just the price that gets in the way most of the time :)
     
  6. Valence

    Valence Formula Junior

    Jan 20, 2004
    883
    Charlottesville, VA
    Full Name:
    Chris& Brian Coffing
    Whatever, man - read the title of the thread - "Why does the F40 seem so much more desired than the F50?" We all like certain cars for certain reasons - but I think the answers to the question have been covered, and one does not have to own one (and probably shouldn't) to have a valid opinion on this.

    You're right - blob of goo might have been the wrong thing to say - in the flesh the F50's more like "large pile of melted bubble gum" (insert little winking smiley face).
     
  7. 512Tea Are

    512Tea Are F1 Rookie

    Apr 22, 2004
    2,742
    Dear Comrades,

    It was envisaged that the F-40 would have a market for four hundred units - at most. This was to be ultimately exceeded by almost three times that number. No doubt Ferrari could clearly see that there was a market for such cars. Therefore, and on the back of the F-40's runaway success, they made the F50, then the Enzo and will no doubt continue to make cars to fill this niche. However, the original car, that was made as celabratory model to mark Ferrari's fortieth year will always remain at the pinnacle of desire for not only the Ferrari aficianado's, but almost the whole world of motor car enthusiasts.

    With kind regards,

    512 Tea Are
     
  8. RTB

    RTB Formula 3

    Sep 5, 2006
    1,071
    UK
    The F50's approach was pioneering, but also provided a lot of vibrations throughout the car.

    Hence, Ferrari and other manufacturers have since used rear subframes to the carbon tub for the engine and gearbox.
     
  9. RTB

    RTB Formula 3

    Sep 5, 2006
    1,071
    UK
    Not ranting - just an accurate observation. And I agree!
     
  10. RTB

    RTB Formula 3

    Sep 5, 2006
    1,071
    UK


    Indeed, the link via the GTO Evoluzione...........
     
  11. RufMD

    RufMD F1 Rookie
    Owner

    Jan 31, 2004
    3,246
    USA
    Full Name:
    Jas
    #111 RufMD, Dec 9, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  12. RufMD

    RufMD F1 Rookie
    Owner

    Jan 31, 2004
    3,246
    USA
    Full Name:
    Jas
  13. SSNISTR

    SSNISTR F1 Veteran

    Feb 13, 2004
    8,046
    SFL
    Nice shot, and it really shows just how different the GTO Evo and F40 actually are.

    But us F40 fans owe much to those very few "mules"!
     
  14. RTB

    RTB Formula 3

    Sep 5, 2006
    1,071
    UK
    They're not really very different at all, except that the GTO Evoluziones with the Tipo 114CK engine are much much quicker!
     
  15. rossocorsa13

    rossocorsa13 F1 Rookie

    Jun 10, 2006
    2,557
    Nashville, Tennessee
    Full Name:
    M
    Just about perfect?? Oh, I'd say that the first two words in that statement aren't necessary. ;)
     
  16. adelg88

    adelg88 Formula Junior

    Nov 18, 2007
    296
    NJ
    Full Name:
    Andrew DelGrosso
    that is insane!
     
  17. DM18

    DM18 F1 Rookie

    Apr 29, 2005
    4,725
    Hong Kong
    +1. F50 with Tubi is raucous
     
  18. GTE

    GTE F1 World Champ

    Jun 24, 2004
    10,117
    The Netherlands
    Full Name:
    Marnix
    The F40 is an automotive icon. The F50 is not.
     
  19. DM18

    DM18 F1 Rookie

    Apr 29, 2005
    4,725
    Hong Kong
    Disagree. F50 is the icon of the 90's
     
  20. Murcielago_Boy

    Murcielago_Boy Formula Junior

    May 27, 2004
    495
    UK
    Full Name:
    The Dark Lord
    That F50 sounds absolutely incredible - worth buying for the noise alone.
     
  21. SSNISTR

    SSNISTR F1 Veteran

    Feb 13, 2004
    8,046
    SFL
    I was refering to their looks. If you ask me while "similar" they actully are very different.
     
  22. SSNISTR

    SSNISTR F1 Veteran

    Feb 13, 2004
    8,046
    SFL
    Many would agree.
     
  23. DennisForza

    DennisForza Formula 3

    May 23, 2006
    1,804
    Arlington, VA
    Full Name:
    Dennis
    F-40 was developed as a no compromise race car for the street.
    F-50 was F-1 technology down graded for the road.

    F-40 wins in my heart, but then again you can go top off with the F-50.

    Both are winners, F-40 just a little more so. ;)
     
  24. dan360

    dan360 F1 Rookie

    Feb 18, 2003
    2,669
    Boston
    Actually a good case can be made for the F40 being made when Ferrari realized they left a massive bunch of money on the table with the 288GTO. "No compromise" certainly not. Its essentially the same chassis as was in a dino. Don't get me wrong, I'm a big fan, but the F40 still has an element of the "kings new clothes" about it to me, its an icon because its an icon.

    At least the F50 was more "engineered". A brand new engine, the attempt to do a no compromise chassis - flawed perhaps but at least a plan they stuck to. The F40 was somewhat more cynical. Perhaps the that's why enzo values are so nuts, because it really was "the best they could do".
     
  25. GTE

    GTE F1 World Champ

    Jun 24, 2004
    10,117
    The Netherlands
    Full Name:
    Marnix

    I don't think that is really the case. The superiority of the F50 needs to be explained, whereas the F40 is self-explanatory, since it is the first and definitive late-80's hypercar. And it were the late eighties when technology made such a car possible and the political correctness of today's world that wants to keep these cars on a leash, wasn't around yet.
     

Share This Page