F40 vs. Countach LP400 Periscopa | FerrariChat

F40 vs. Countach LP400 Periscopa

Discussion in 'Ferrari Discussion (not model specific)' started by FandLcars, Dec 13, 2007.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. FandLcars

    FandLcars F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    Messages:
    3,057
    Location:
    Tempe, Az
    Full Name:
    Rick Schumm
    Seems that F40s are priced around $500k +/- And we know early LP400s have really taken off in the last couple years. So while still searching for a 348TS, I happened to notice an F40 for sale on Autotrader for $599k, and an LP400 periscope version on Ebay, also for $599k!

    I thought about taking a poll, but I really think that most here would take the F40 in a heartbeat (I would), assuming same condition and price. Of course, they are far different cars, more modern Turbo track Ferrari vs. vintage Lambo GT with earth-shattering design (for the time). But still wondering if anyone would rather have the LP400? If it's really worth north of $500k, how much more should an F40 be worth? Do you think the F40 will soon also be rapidly appreciating? I'd say the LP400 periscope is more rare, but haven't tried to check production figures.

    Thought it would be an interesting question. Opinions? BTW - I can't afford either one :(
     
  2. DMOORE

    DMOORE Formula 3

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2005
    Messages:
    1,720
    Location:
    San Diego
    Full Name:
    Darrell
    An F40 for 500K. The ones that I have seen recently have been around 600K.





    Darrell.
     
  3. WILLIAM H

    WILLIAM H Three Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2003
    Messages:
    35,532
    Location:
    Victory Circle
    Full Name:
    HUBBSTER
    I have an F40 and an 86 Countach 5000QV

    The F40 is just fantastic after you upgrade the brakes & add Tubi straight pipes

    The Countach is a fantastic looking exotic but the F40 is much more fun to drive
     
  4. Bullfighter

    Bullfighter Two Time F1 World Champ Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    22,618
    Location:
    Gates Mills, Ohio
    Full Name:
    Jon
    He said $599K.

    I haven't driven/been in an LP400. From my experience in a later injected Countach, I think the F40 is the superior car. But it's also far newer technologically.

    There are 1300+ F40s, so clearly the LP400 is rarer.

    I suppose I'd take the F40 to drive, and the LP400 if it was a show car/trailer queen.
     
  5. amenasce

    amenasce Three Time F1 World Champ Silver Subscribed

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2001
    Messages:
    34,723
    Full Name:
    Joe Mansion
    Having driven a Countach 25th and an F40 several times, the Countach can only dream to replicate the driving experience the F40 brings. In fact i didnt have much fun in the Countach. very very cramped interior , gearbox was a nightmare , impossible to see out of , very light front end that likes to change lanes on its own..

    Nice to listen to and to look at but once you leave the driveway, id rather be in the Ferrari.
     
  6. SSNISTR

    SSNISTR F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    8,046
    Location:
    SFL
    No question. F40.
     
  7. Auraraptor

    Auraraptor F1 World Champ Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2002
    Messages:
    14,199
    Location:
    MO
    Full Name:
    Omar
    Miura over both.
     
  8. SSNISTR

    SSNISTR F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    8,046
    Location:
    SFL
    You should change your sig to "the same seats in the US spec F40".

    Euro spec seats are true racing seats. Just a heads up....
     
  9. Auraraptor

    Auraraptor F1 World Champ Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2002
    Messages:
    14,199
    Location:
    MO
    Full Name:
    Omar
    Thanks for the info!
     
  10. Kingair33

    Kingair33 Formula Junior

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    941
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    Full Name:
    Alex
    This would be a tough decision but then again they aren't in the same category.
     
  11. notoboy

    notoboy F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2003
    Messages:
    2,531
    Location:
    NYC
    Full Name:
    David
    Miura SV over both ;)
     
  12. ralfabco

    ralfabco Two Time F1 World Champ Lifetime Rossa

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2002
    Messages:
    28,029
    Location:
    Dixie
    Full Name:
    Itamar Ben-Gvir
    Apples and oranges


    It is like asking someone, if they want a tired Lusso driver, or a F430 F-1 Spyder. Both cars have nothing in common.


    LP 400 production, is approximately 150 cars from 1974-1977.
     
  13. FandLcars

    FandLcars F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    Messages:
    3,057
    Location:
    Tempe, Az
    Full Name:
    Rick Schumm
    I tend to think the future collector and $ value of a Miura would be greater than for an F40, so that would be a tough choice for me. The Miura is an amazing vintage classic, from an era we'll never see again (well, unless another mile-wide asteroid hits) :) But the F40 still has incredible appeal... a racing Fcar (sorry tightly-wound members) for the street! An amazing car to look at, and I'm sure just awesome to drive.

    But they are different cars for different buyers. There are a couple F40s in the $500k area in the Ferrari Market Letter. F40 seems undervalued to me, if an LP400 is worth $500k and a Miura is $750k-1Mil (or whatever latest sale is).
     
  14. ralfabco

    ralfabco Two Time F1 World Champ Lifetime Rossa

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2002
    Messages:
    28,029
    Location:
    Dixie
    Full Name:
    Itamar Ben-Gvir


    ...and a Lamborghini 350GT at 250K is undervalued, if a Lusso is 450K. A 1990 ZR-1 Corvette is also undervalued at 30K, if a 1990 Testarossa is 65K.


    We can play these games all day.
     
  15. robert_c

    robert_c F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Messages:
    3,417
    Location:
    SoCal
    Full Name:
    Robert C
    And wasn't there just an F40 that didn't sell for $712k? (Which I call BS, the seller had to be fishing.)
    So there might be a $100k difference.
    My vote is for the F40, but ask this question in Lamboland and I'm sure you'll get Lambo votes.
    And regarding rarity, to me the issue is looks. I like to F40 better. The LP400 looks like 400S, 500S, and the 5000. The F40 only looks like the F40.
     
  16. FandLcars

    FandLcars F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    Messages:
    3,057
    Location:
    Tempe, Az
    Full Name:
    Rick Schumm
    Just expressing an opinion. Not asking you to agree with it.
     
  17. robert_c

    robert_c F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Messages:
    3,417
    Location:
    SoCal
    Full Name:
    Robert C
    F40 vs. Miura is a harder question. Still apples vs. oranges, but I love them both. I may have to go Miura. Damn you hypothetical questions!!
     
  18. FandLcars

    FandLcars F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    Messages:
    3,057
    Location:
    Tempe, Az
    Full Name:
    Rick Schumm
    I've found all these comments interesting. Yes, it's a hypothetical question; If you ask Lambo folks (which I also am.. own a 400GT), you'll get different opinions than if you ask Ferrari folks. No mystery there. I'd still prefer the F40, even though I grew up in the '60s and bought my first Ferrari in the '70s.

    I'd think that if you ask the general collector/exotic car-buying population, a majority would prefer an F40 to an LP400. And yet the F40 is priced the same. I'm sure there are more F40s available than LP400 w/periscope. So that's one explanation. Maybe people expect much higher maint. costs for an F40 than for the LP400. Not sure... so that's why I asked the question... just to see how others feel about some current differences in the market, these two amazing cars, and what drives exotic purchase decisions and values. In the end, we all make our own decisions based on our own criteria. :)
     
  19. blkprlz

    blkprlz Formula 3

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Messages:
    2,169
    Location:
    Tampa bay
    Full Name:
    Bruce
    SV for sure!
     
  20. Pantera

    Pantera F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2004
    Messages:
    4,479
    Mclaren F1!.
     
  21. Mr.Anthony337

    Mr.Anthony337 Formula Junior

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    349
    Location:
    91106
    Full Name:
    Russell
    I think somehow the thread when from LP400 Perisopa Countach vs F40 to Miura's vs F40's :)

    My opinion, the Countach. Just for it's place in car history (granted the F40 holds honors as well), and the fact that it's out of this world design is STILL turning heads... and well... I'm just an addict, and thats what it comes down to. I'm not as interested in the pure power and details when driving or tracking a car, cause I rarely get to speeds that would really cause me to worry about that level of detail. I just like to enjoy the car for what it is good and bad, and I think I'd hands down enjoy a Countach over much else.

    But... if I wanted to go crazy on a track day ;) F40 (even though I've only seen one from distance, never even sat in one yet) for sure.

    ... and I know some will wonder how this is possible but... seriously, other than collector value... I wouldn't be pressed for a Miura. Not sure why, just never "stuck" with me. Again, havent gotten to ride in one or anything yet, so that could change at the turn of a key someday.
     
  22. Ferrari250GTO

    Ferrari250GTO Formula 3

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2006
    Messages:
    1,494
    Location:
    Philadelphia PA
    I would have to go with the F40 in terms of looks
     
  23. SSNISTR

    SSNISTR F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2004
    Messages:
    8,046
    Location:
    SFL
    The F40 has a better place in history if you ask me.

    First true supercar.

    First true production car to break 200 MPH.
     
  24. frefan

    frefan F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2004
    Messages:
    7,370
    Isn't the countach a fiberglass & alumimum car that weighs 3300 lbs, built over 16 years, with a production run over 2,000 units? I can't believe they are the same money. Someone plz post up some pics for comparison.
     
  25. FandLcars

    FandLcars F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    Messages:
    3,057
    Location:
    Tempe, Az
    Full Name:
    Rick Schumm
    My references show only 150 total production for the LP400, and I don't believe all of them had the periscope. But I don't have any references that say for sure how many had the periscope. I haven't checked a few of the major Lambo websites, which may have more info.
     

Share This Page