http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/522927-REG/Hasselblad_70380530_H3DII_39_SLR_Digital_Camera.html 39 mega pix
Is this a serious question, or it is like me saying "used 996 GT3 or telephoto lens: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/800557508-USE/Canon_2527A001_Super_Telephoto_1200mm_f_5_6L.html"? In any case, that's an amazing camera, especially for portraiture and landscapes. Would be hard to use for motorsports, etc.. I spoke with a guy using one at SEMA, and he regretting bringing it instead of his Canon EOS1D.
If I could, I would! [you'd need big tower with an insane amount of RAM to handle images that size too, but even that would only be a fraction of the cost of the camera]
What do you think the 2.8 version of that lens costs....Hubble territory no doubt!!!! I have a nikon 2.8 300mm...with 2 doublers on it I am at 1200mm and a f 11.2...all for under 3g's problem is you can only shoot sun spots at 11.2
I've used Hasselblads (500CM, 500ELM) for many years. The quality is phenomenal, a bit clumsy to use.