Not so fast, Vern. EuroSpares shows the Ferrari 355 M2.7 versions using the same MAF as does the Motronic 2.7 512M. The 512M's MAF is shown below, and it has the same CO screw and plug (part #6) as does the Ferrari 348 MAF (plug is part #10 shown below in second pic). Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
Like I said you can't adjust the CO on a 2.7 355. I have one in my garage, no screws no adjusting. My factory parts manuals show 2 different part #s for the 348 unit and 355 unit. Weren't you the one telling me one time that reading the owners manual didn't mean much because of the errors you might find. Well maybe you are reading an error.
Easy enough to verify. Eurospares shows two part numbers for the MAFs on M2.7 355's: 138403 and 154916 Which MAFs do you have?
No. they are wrong, my factory parts books show 138# for 348 and the other for 355. I suppose you could use the 138# on a 355 2.7 but what good would it do, the 6th terminal on the 138# is the adjusting lead for the CO and the 355 doesn't have that terminal in its plug. ie; the ECU has no read input because its preset.
Hey Vern, out of curiousity for the original question on this thread, do you get a 383 ohm resistance measurement between pins 1 and 5 on your MAF?
Ah, but this thread is SPECIFICALLY about the 5.2 Motronic. Unfortunately, you have diverted this thread in a confusing and different direction from what was intended.
I'd be curious to know if you get a resistance measurement like "383 ohms" between pins 1 and 5 on your 5.2 MAF. That *may* be a way to check one part of the calibration.
It would be infinity. There is no pin #5 on a MAF for a 5.2 Motronic F355. Please, no more comparison with your 348, this system is obviously different.
+1 lol.......... I believe our 5.2 MAF has 4 pins............... though I do not know what pin does what. However I do know we have a separate temp sensor downstream of the MAF, where I think the 2.7 has 2 of its pins designated for a 'MAF integrated' temp sensor.