When did "they" start putting computer chips in cars?

I'm probably going to get banned for this. But, hey, what's a life without risk.

I also posted this in technical.

What year would you say that they started putting chips in cars? 1983?

I just found out today that my C55 doesn't have a dipstick. That's it. I quit. I'm going to flip a digit to the digital age.

Dale

 

The Corvette amd many other GM cars started using computer controlled carburetors in 1981. In 1982 they switched to a throttle body system in the Corvette and eliminated the carburetor completely. Of course it probably depends upon which manufacturer you are asking about, but 1981 is the general year for GM to start using computers. The 1981 vintage computer controlled carburetor was an interim system between old fashioned carburetors and throttle body injector systems.

 

I will pass up on the obvious dipstick joke.

 

This actually brings up another issue. The electronic oil meter.

I hate the fact that I don't have a dipstick in my car. I have to go by this stupid computer readout. The dipstick is on thing that should be left alone.

 

I think that that exact sentiment explains why mechanical watches are enjoying extreme popularity.

Surprisingly, there's a similar revival in using straight razors for shaving. (And I'm completely serious!)

 

You know, there might be legitimate reasons besides just checking the level to actually look at your oil once in a while...I suppose this means there is not one on new automatic transmissions, either?

BTW, there is kind of a "grey area" here on "what exactly is a computer". Early EFI came along in the seventies, IIRC, and you might make the point that it was sort of an "analog computer".

For sure I had a 1983/1984 early C4 Corvette that had a heck of a computerized instrument panel. It spawned quite the little cottage industry for retired TV repairman types who would fix them for less than the approximately $1600.00 that GM wanted for their little darling. To be fair, I guess the Z51 suspension put a lot of stress on it - it would even knock out the taillights every two or three months.

 

Exactly.

 

Personally I would rather have the dgital readout, that way its much less responsibility on my part.

 

I know what you mean!

That's why I like an automatic transmission too; way less responsibility to have to coordinate the clutch and gas and shifter....

(my god, a clutch! what were they thinking?)

 

LOL.

 

Sometime after the F-117 was built.

 

My buddy's 99 Jag XJR doesn't have one on his transmission. It's actually a MB unit Jag used. He's been having transmission issues and asked my advice. First thing out of my mouth was to check the fluid level. He has no way to do so.

And for those Jag lovers, yes his engine has already failed due to the Nikasil cylinder liners. Luckily he had an extended warrantee. Best $3K he'd ever spent.