Ferrari Goes NASCAR | Page 3 | FerrariChat

Ferrari Goes NASCAR

Discussion in 'Ferrari Discussion (not model specific)' started by venusone, Apr 8, 2008.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. MooneyPilot

    MooneyPilot Rookie

    Jul 8, 2005
    37
    Napa, CA
    Full Name:
    N Dennis
    It sure is comforting to know that I am not the only working class Ferrari loving, NASCAR watching, displaced redneck(Nor Cal here) on this forum. Seen 16 of last 20 Daytona 500's, been to Charlotte World 600, been to Indy 500, been Phoenix(2nd favorite track), been to Sears Point...won't go back (unless by helicopter), been to Fontana...won't go back at all until policies change, been to Laguna Seca(horrible drive...easy flight into Monterey Airport), been to Portland Int'l Raceway, and someday will go to Bristol night race.
    N Dennis
     
  2. 328gtsfan

    328gtsfan Formula Junior

    Aug 7, 2004
    830
    Aus
    Full Name:
    Greg
    I was just having a dig at your US centric comment :)

    During one visit to the US I went to an oval race in North Carolina ( I just checked my photos, Lowe Motor Speedway).. the speed and closeness of the cars both on the track and to us was quite an assault on the senses. This was during the time when Subaru was on top of their game in the World Rally Championship and my Subaru WRC cap wasn't quite understood/appreciated.
    I appreciate the offer of a seat though!

    I also agree F1 needs more passing and a good battle for the championship.. if it would be anything like when the British Touring Car Championship was great to watch, however that didn't last either... perhaps it became a victim of it's success?

    cheers,
    Greg
     
  3. dwhite

    dwhite F1 Rookie

    Probably because they want their brand to be affiliated with cutting-edge technological advances not stone-age technology. The oval-racing-demolition-derbies are probably not the best place for them to showcase their product.
     
  4. Gatorrari

    Gatorrari F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Feb 27, 2004
    16,505
    Georgia
    Full Name:
    Jim Pernikoff
    #54 Gatorrari, Apr 11, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Here's a better photo of the Ferrari-sponsored Cup car. The color looks like a pretty good match to Rosso Corsa. But did it race with the number error?
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  5. robert_c

    robert_c F1 Rookie

    May 12, 2005
    3,417
    SoCal
    Full Name:
    Robert C
    Source please.

    My guess is F1 is more popular and monetarily successful because it is a worldwide audience.
     
  6. Ken

    Ken F1 World Champ

    Oct 19, 2001
    16,078
    Arlington Heights IL
    Full Name:
    Kenneth
    The point of NASCAR isn't product development like F1 used to be back in the day. It's to provide entertainment, which it does better than any other racing in the world. If Ferrari sticks to the philosophy of racing as a platform for technological development, it would be unlikely they have any interest in NASCAR at all.

    Ken
     
  7. dwhite

    dwhite F1 Rookie

    You're right it does provide a form of entertainment, as does the WWF which also thirves on the same good guys vs bad boys formula. Take away the crashes in NASCAR and the chair to the head in wrestling and what do you have left to keep people interested. I watched the last half of the Daytona 500 I admit it was exciting until the last laps were full of crashes and cautions taking a potentially exciting finish and turning it into a battle royal. Who won the race, oh yeah, Ryan Newman wooo whooo. Can't remember did he do the ubiquitious back flip and donuts or was it the pile driver and full suplex.
     
  8. Prugna 328

    Prugna 328 Formula 3

    Sep 10, 2003
    1,233
    L.I.N.Y.
    Full Name:
    Gregory
    Agreed this is the most ridiculous question ever. They all run spec bodies with templates to make sure they are legal. Which of course LOOK JUST LIKE A 430.
     
  9. MooneyPilot

    MooneyPilot Rookie

    Jul 8, 2005
    37
    Napa, CA
    Full Name:
    N Dennis
    robert_c:"Source please.

    My guess is F1 is more popular and monetarily successful because it is a worldwide audience."

    Shear numbers and head counts and the number of races held in the cup series(36) and dollars spent in advertising, concessions, souveniers, sponsorships and by the paying public amounts to untold Billions and Billions of dollars....... of course now that the dollar has crashed into the abyss, maybe there is more $$$ in F1. I feel Brian has now oversold and pimped out the series to Corporate Freaking America and they are now whining about the flattening in viewership ratings. NASCAR does not have the worldwide venues, so those outside the US have no concept of what it's really all about. F1 has not had success here and the general public here has no concept of what F1 is about, yet somehow much of the world outside the US does. NASCAR is a "working man's" racing series, whereas F1 is the "wine and cheese" series. I have seen the NASCAR series transformed from a "Stock Car" series to what amounts to a "Spec" series and as a "core fan", I am not happy about it at all.
    N Dennis
     
  10. bounty

    bounty F1 Veteran

    Feb 18, 2006
    7,769
    San Diego, CA
    Soccer is by far and away the most popular sport globally.

    Profitable?

    According to Forbes.com, the most profitable sport in the world is American Football (College and Professional) respectively. The Dallas Cowboys are the most valuable franchise in the NFL with a net worth of about $1.4 Billion.
     
  11. gsjohnson

    gsjohnson Formula 3

    Feb 25, 2008
    2,291
    Woodland Hills, CA
    Full Name:
    GS Johnson
    There's some truth to your statements. Nascar will sell out over 95% of their available seats at all 35 venues, Yet F1 can't sell out at one venue (Indy) here in the U.S.
     

Share This Page