Waring about mobile1 o-w40 | Page 4 | FerrariChat

Waring about mobile1 o-w40

Discussion in 'Technical Q&A' started by billwann, Jul 16, 2008.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. atlantaman

    atlantaman Formula 3

    Mar 31, 2002
    1,726
    Roswell, Georgia
    Full Name:
    Charles
    This may be a stupid question but what does the manual suggest for the car?

    A bit about oil...

    The crank, cams, piston bushings never touch the adjoining bearing surface. the viscosity of the oil is selected so that it provides a bed for the metal part to float above the bearing. If you go to a thin oil in a car that was designed for a thick oil, there is too much of a gap between parts and the oil escapes without providing a proper "bed" to float the part.

    My old 330 and my 308 say use a thick oil like 10w40 or 20w50. If I put 0w40 in one of those motors, I would be making contact between parts and the motor would likely be dead in 5000miles...

    when you blow a motor under warranty, the first thing that is checked is the oil viscosity. Using the wrong oil is the quickest way to void a warranty.
     
  2. hardtop

    hardtop F1 World Champ

    Jan 31, 2002
    11,298
    Colorado
    Full Name:
    Dave

    Not true. In the first place, 0-40 is thinner than 10-40 only at cold temps. At operating temps, mobil 1 0-40 retains viscosity better than other 40 weights and some 50 weights according to tests I read. All oils, including 0-20, 0-30, etc. are still thicker than optimum at startup (see A.Haas oil briefs here). There have also been advances in oils that allows the newer lower viscosities. In fact, Ferrari originally used 20-50 in 328's but at some point in the production run changed to 10-40 without any changes in the motors. If anything, using that old 20-50 mud in your motor for everyday use will likely shorten it's life due to poor flow at startups, not extend it. If the 0 weights allowed contact between parts, they would be useless in any motor. I (and others) have been using 0-40 in our 328's for years. There is no change in oil pressures. By the account given, this motor failed at operating temperature when the viscosity of the mobil 1 would have been as thick or thicker than any 10-40 oil.

    Dave

    Dave

    Dave
     
  3. MaterMech

    MaterMech Formula Junior

    Feb 26, 2007
    476
    Los Gatos CA
    Full Name:
    Mark Johnson

    Agreed, I was under the impression that this motor was using 10w40 but may have misread.
     
  4. atlantaman

    atlantaman Formula 3

    Mar 31, 2002
    1,726
    Roswell, Georgia
    Full Name:
    Charles
    The gaps and clearances in a motor are established on using a specific oil viscosity, not the other way around. Also, when the motor is cold it is at its most vulnerable time and needs the suggested oil weight. I only run 20-50 on my 308 and 330 motors and have never had even the slightest indication of a problem. The new zero weight oils should only be used on cars that call for it. When I am working on a new machine or motor design, proper oil weight is my #1 concern in the design process.
     
  5. GrndLkNatv

    GrndLkNatv Formula Junior

    Sep 13, 2006
    878
    Grand Lake, Colorado
    Full Name:
    Mark Stephens
    #80 GrndLkNatv, Jul 21, 2008
    Last edited: Jul 21, 2008
    First off if the oil caused this problem it wouldn't just be on two rods and two cylinders, it would have caused damage to all in some form or the other which tells me it's not the oil.. How can bad oil ruin two rods and rod bearings and not other components in the engine. Using 0W-40 has nothing to do with this problem and if McLaren can run straight 5W Mobil 1 synthetic oil in their formula 1 car, I doubt you will have a problem in any car that turns less than half the RPM and has less than half the horsepower.. Startup time on an Engine is the time it get's most of it's wear, that's why Bruce-McBeth tug boat engines are never turned off and why they change the oil while it's running...

    Secondly, you have all missed the post in this thread by the leading expert in oil: Ali E. Haas..

    Dr Haas posted in this section and if you do a search on him and motor oil you will find that he knows more about motor oil than everyone else on this board combined... Read his post again.. BTW, Dr. Haas, glad to see your still trolling here!

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    This looks like full thickness bearing loss and is typical of cavitation. If it is cavitation, this type of damage can be caused by starting up the engine and immediately revving it up to high RPM. This can occur at room temperature but is worse as the temperature drops.

    Also, oil starvation can occur by starting it up and instantly revving it, worsened by long periods of non use before stepping on the gas so fast.

    All this assumes there was no particles in there blocking circulation or small enough to get into the bearing then scrape it. What do all the other bearings look like? One has to consider a manufacturing defect as well.

    aehaas
    __________________
    My mom always said to look for the good in things. If you make this your practice you will only experience good things. Your life will always be filled with happiness.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    http://www.supramania.com/aehaas/

    About the author:
    Dr. Haas is a physician and surgeon. He graduated from the University of Florida with a degree in biochemistry with honors. He studied motor oils since high school where he did independent studies on this topic. He studied the properties of viscosity.

    When he was a general surgery resident in Chapel Hill he studied the flow mechanics of human blood. Today he continues his research by discussion of oil products with chemists in the field and chemists from the oil manufacturers.

    He has personal racing experience in Formula Super Vee. He is his own Lamborghini and Ferrari as well as Mercedes mechanic.


    Also Windsock, who is very knowledgeable posted this:
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    When you access the clutch on a 360 you open up the main feed line (casting) between the oil sump in the gearbox and the engine block. There is also a large p/u sreen in the gearbox side. It is likely something got into that feed line and caused the concern. I have also seen the o-ring between the gearbox and block leak while the engine in running and the suction on the o-ring as it is on the pick up side of the pump causes air ingestion into the oil. The oil ingestion causes the bearings at the farthest point from the pump to contact the crank, air in the oil causes the fluid cushion to break down much like air in a brake line. Bearings contact the crank and fail.

    We have seen this before. Just a thought.

    Good luck.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Which directly fits what Dr. Haas said... So here is what happened.

    CONCLUSION:


    The clutch was replaced, the o-ring between the block and gearbox was damaged during the process and that caused air to enter the oil distribution system/gallery, which caused "cavitation", which caused the bearings at the farthest point from the point to fail and that's why no other bearings were affected. You might also notice that the furtherest bearing from the pump is more damaged than the next one down the line... Proof of this whole hypothesis would be examining the o-ring which should show damage..

    So IMHO the moral of the story is that replacing the clutch caused the problem and it had nothing to do with the oil itself.
    This is also why the engine didn't fail before, didn't show signs of previous damage, as the O-Ring had not been damaged previously.
     
  6. 2NA

    2NA F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner Professional Ferrari Technician

    Dec 29, 2006
    18,221
    Twin Cities
    Full Name:
    Tim Keseluk
    The jury's still waiting to see the 27-8x10 color glossy pictures with the circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one explainin' what each one was....................................... :rolleyes:
     
  7. LennyZeutzius

    LennyZeutzius Karting
    BANNED

    Dec 21, 2004
    211
    Palmdale, CA
    Full Name:
    Lenny
    IF, this o-ring had not been installed correctly, would there not have been oil leaking (profusely) to the outside world....on the diffuser panel / ground?

    I don't think Bill mentioned oil leaking anywhere.
     
  8. Brian Harper

    Brian Harper F1 Rookie
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Feb 17, 2006
    4,078
    San Jose area
    Full Name:
    Brian Harper
    This o-ring is allegedly on the suction side of the oil pump, so it is possible that it wouldn't leak or would only leak minimally, and even then only when the engine was off.
     
  9. LennyZeutzius

    LennyZeutzius Karting
    BANNED

    Dec 21, 2004
    211
    Palmdale, CA
    Full Name:
    Lenny
    Hi Brian,

    Nonetheless, it would still leak.

    And even if it's on the suction side of the pump......it would only "not leak" if it actually creates enough suction to go into a "vacuum state" and
    remain in a vacuum state 24/7 on or off ...correct?

    Thus, it would leak.

    My 2 cents anyways.
     
  10. GrndLkNatv

    GrndLkNatv Formula Junior

    Sep 13, 2006
    878
    Grand Lake, Colorado
    Full Name:
    Mark Stephens
    #85 GrndLkNatv, Jul 21, 2008
    Last edited: Jul 21, 2008
    so it would leak air internally
    but not oil externally... thats why pcv was
    invented to get rid of that vacuum in the
    crankcase.... once the engine quits running there
    is no more vacuum in the crankcase
     
  11. billwann

    billwann Formula Junior

    Jan 5, 2004
    324
    Bristol Wisconsin .
    Full Name:
    Bill Wann
    The oring was one of the first thing that inspected when I took it out . It looks as good as it did when i installed it . The one that I reaplaced was flattened out over time and pressure , this one was still nice and round and smooth . I will post a picture when i get a chance . Next idea please . Over the last few days I have had a couple of conversations with some well know ferrari mechanics who have all seen this problem with this oil . So its not just my car , I was just the only one willing to talk about it so far . I like the fact that everyone likes to point to me not doing the clutch job right . If you have ever done a clutch on a 360 you would find that its quit e straight forward and very simple .
     
  12. GrndLkNatv

    GrndLkNatv Formula Junior

    Sep 13, 2006
    878
    Grand Lake, Colorado
    Full Name:
    Mark Stephens
    #87 GrndLkNatv, Jul 22, 2008
    Last edited: Jul 22, 2008
    Bill, Mobil 1 guarantees their oil won't harm your car... If you can prove it's the oil, they will buy you an engine.... Not only that they will do the analysis for free. If their oil was harming Ferrari engines all over the place, as some of your mechanics are stating, I am sure that would want that fixed. Crazy thing is that Mobil 1 has higher ratings than most of the other synthetics on the market. If you read Dr. Haas and his analysis he proves that.

    http://www.mobiloil.com/USA-English/MotorOil/Oils/Mobil_1_Warranty.aspx


    Mobil 1


    Mobil 1 Motor Oil Limited Warranty

    This is a limited warranty covering the Mobil 1 motor lubricant you purchased. ExxonMobil warrants its lubricants to be free from defects and will replace any Mobil lubricant that is defective. For all vehicles follow the recommended oil change interval in your owner's manual. ExxonMobil warrants that the Mobil 1 lubricant you purchased will protect your vehicle’s critical engine parts from oil related failure. If not, provided the engine was serviceable at the time the oil was installed, Exxon Mobil will have your vehicle repaired and replace the oil at no cost to you.

    ExxonMobil Lubricants & Petroleum Specialties Company, a division of Exxon Mobil Corporation ("ExxonMobil") provides this limited warranty to the purchasers who use Mobil brand lubricants in their vehicle.

    This limited warranty covers the Mobil 1 lubricant and critical engine parts lubricated by the lubricant.

    If there is equipment failure related to the Mobil brand lubricant you purchased, ExxonMobil will repair any equipment damage directly caused by a defect or malfunction of a Mobil lubricant, provided that the lubricant was selected and maintained in accordance with specifications of the original equipment manufacturer or the written instructions (which includes product packaging) of ExxonMobil.

    To file a claim under this Limited Warranty, you must:

    Upon discovery of the damage (but not later than six (6) months from the date the damage occurred) call 1-800-AskMobil.

    Allow an ExxonMobil representative to examine the equipment and maintenance records, if available, and provide proof of purchase to determine the extent of the damage and to confirm that a Mobil lubricant was the cause.

    Allow an ExxonMobil representative to obtain an oil sample from the engine for oil analysis at no cost to you to assist in determining the cause of the equipment failure.

    This Limited Warranty excludes:

    Mobil lubricants used in mechanically deficient equipment as a result of abnormal operation; negligence; abuse; damage from casualty, shipment or accident; or, equipment modification done without written authorization from the OEM.

    Situations where the OEM required lubricant standards do not match those stated by Mobil without written approval from ExxonMobil.

    Mobil lubricants that have been used in conjunction with any other product or additive that has not been authorized for use by ExxonMobil.

    Failure of equipment due to a pre-existing condition that is unrelated to the use of Mobil lubricants.

    Repair or replacement of equipment due to normal wears.

    The remedy provided here will be your only recovery against ExxonMobil. You will not be able to recover incidental or consequential damages. Some states do not allow the exclusion of or limitation of incidental or consequential damages, so the above limitation or exclusion may not apply to you.
    This warranty gives you specific legal rights, and you may also have other rights, which vary from state to state.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Also, call this guy, one of the best Ferrari guys on the planet, known to most Ferrari people:

    http://www.****************.com/index.html

    Dave's opinion would be interesting....

    Please contact Mobil 1 and let us know what they say....
     
  13. 2NA

    2NA F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner Professional Ferrari Technician

    Dec 29, 2006
    18,221
    Twin Cities
    Full Name:
    Tim Keseluk
    So far it looks like only a couple of guys are blaming the clutch work.
     
  14. Guy Webster

    Guy Webster Karting
    BANNED

    Jun 13, 2007
    187
    Pasadena
    Full Name:
    Guy Webster
    360 manual says to run 5-40

    He ran 0-40

    So then why should Mobil 1 warranty anything?
     
  15. GrndLkNatv

    GrndLkNatv Formula Junior

    Sep 13, 2006
    878
    Grand Lake, Colorado
    Full Name:
    Mark Stephens
    #90 GrndLkNatv, Jul 22, 2008
    Last edited: Jul 22, 2008
    itself is if in manufacturing they created a bad case of oil which Bill happened to get. Mobil 1 will pay for his car to be repaired and all he has to do is send in a sample of the oil and tell them what happened.


    As for the comment regarding 5W versus 0W I think you need to read oil 101 by Dr. Haas... The only difference is the pour weight when the oil is cold, not the lubrication.

    I don't think Mobil 1 cares what the recommendation was... Read their own warranty:

    "This is a limited warranty covering the Mobil 1 motor lubricant you purchased. ExxonMobil warrants its lubricants to be free from defects and will replace any Mobil lubricant that is defective. For all vehicles follow the recommended oil change interval in your owner's manual. ExxonMobil warrants that the Mobil 1 lubricant you purchased will protect your vehicle’s critical engine parts from oil related failure. If not, provided the engine was serviceable at the time the oil was installed, Exxon Mobil will have your vehicle repaired and replace the oil at no cost to you."

    Mobil 1 is rated as high or higher than royal purple.

    Heck if it were me, I would bottle up some of that oil and send it in.. Beats the heck out of paying for a Ferrari engine rebuild. I mean what is 10 bucks for Fedex when compared to 20k for a full rebuild?

    BTW, I run this oil in my cars, all of them, and in my motorcycles.
     
  16. GrndLkNatv

    GrndLkNatv Formula Junior

    Sep 13, 2006
    878
    Grand Lake, Colorado
    Full Name:
    Mark Stephens
    I got in contact with Mobil 1 about their guarantee.. Matt Jacob is more than happy to discuss your oil problem if you would like to call him..

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Mobil 1's high performance is based on years of technology development,
    working with car manufactures and extensive testing. We have full
    confidence in Mobil 1 and its superior performance.

    Please give us a call so we can discuss this.

    --
    Thank you for choosing ExxonMobil products.
    Contact ExxonMobil at 1-800-ASK-MOBIL

    -Matt Jacob

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     
  17. Bluehinder

    Bluehinder Formula Junior

    Aug 9, 2005
    889
    Colorado
    This is the most fascinating and educational thread on the board. Thanks to all for contributing.
     
  18. enzo thecat

    enzo thecat F1 Veteran
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Jan 27, 2008
    5,896
    Midwest
    Full Name:
    Enzo Thecat
    +1
     
  19. saw1998

    saw1998 F1 Veteran

    Jun 8, 2008
    8,237
    San Antonio, Texas
    Full Name:
    Scott
    Was the ACTUAL cause or causes of the engine failure ever posted? It was a great thread and I, for one, would certainly like to know more.
     
  20. swilliams

    swilliams Formula 3

    Jun 14, 2006
    1,407
    Bowling Green, KY
    Full Name:
    Scott
    Lou,

    I think you might be right.. Bill I would contact Rifledriver on this board, I think he is looking for people that have had the pre cats fail and get sucked back in to the cylinder. (360 has lots of valve overlap) I think he is working on a class-action suit and he has won before. That would explain a lot in this case.
     
  21. Rifledriver

    Rifledriver Three Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 29, 2004
    37,288
    Cowboy Capitol of the World
    Full Name:
    Brian Crall
    I do not think this is related.

    But for the sake of accuracy since there are NDA's involved, I know of many failures of 360 manifolds. I know precat failures have happened, I know engine damage has happened. I would like to know of any manifold failures besides simple cracks. I am not working on a suit, just fact finding and data collecting.
     
  22. Michael B

    Michael B F1 Rookie
    Owner

    Apr 28, 2004
    3,764
    US of A
    Full Name:
    Michael
    #97 Michael B, Sep 14, 2008
    Last edited: Sep 14, 2008
    Just throwing this out there...

    Recently I have been notified that current Mobil 1 is not recommended for all vehicles any longer. Reportedly the new formula does not have all of the needed additives that say an earlier Ferrari/Porsche engine may require without adding a supplemental ingredient (such as Royal Purple would have in their formulation). This has become necessary as today's current cars (like a new Porsche that is factory filled with Mobil 1) have new requirements and possibly environmental restraints that make the newest Mobil 1 formulation a requirement.

    Therefore other oils are now being recommended for older vehicles - such as so many of us own. I understand that the "extended performance / high mileage" Mobil 1 may have the added lubrication properties that older vehicles would require.
     
  23. tony94s4

    tony94s4 Rookie

    Sep 12, 2008
    35
    Fort Worth, TX, USA
    Full Name:
    Tony R
    sorry to hear,

    any update?

    I am new to ferrari but I've worked on performance engines
    it dosen't look like oil problem,

    me and some friends we switched to red line after extended performance mobil one
    was introduced, but the damages were more cam related,

    If ur rebuilding if its me I would make sure the fuel system is working properly
    fllow test & balancing injectors,

    looking @ the head and piston looks like that cylinder has been running lean
    pinging may have put load on that bearing

    good luck
    tony
     
  24. Whisky

    Whisky Three Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jan 27, 2006
    32,270
    In the flight path to Offutt
    Full Name:
    The original Fernando
    #99 Whisky, Sep 21, 2008
    Last edited: Sep 21, 2008
    Help us out with some links or further reading please.

    I have a brand new Honda, and they use Honda (nee Mobil) motor oil that is the synthetic 'Blend', which I believe is a 50/50 synthetic/organic blend.

    I have been trying to find out how well Castrol Syntec stands up, but so far, I can't find any decent objective write-ups on it.
     
  25. Michael B

    Michael B F1 Rookie
    Owner

    Apr 28, 2004
    3,764
    US of A
    Full Name:
    Michael

Share This Page