Standard Engines set for go-ahead | FerrariChat

Standard Engines set for go-ahead

Discussion in 'Other Racing' started by Remy Zero, Dec 9, 2008.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Remy Zero

    Remy Zero Two Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 26, 2005
    23,478
    KL, Malaysia
    Full Name:
    MC Cool Breeze
    Radical plans for a standard engine in Formula One look almost certain to be rubber-stamped by the FIA later this week, autosport.com has learned, with five teams including Renault believed to have expressed an interest in signing up to the deal.

    FIA president Max Mosley has given teams until Thursday afternoon to sign up to the option of having a standard-specification Cosworth engine from 2010.

    In a letter to the teams last week, he said the deal would go ahead as long as a minimum of four outfits were interested in a three-year deal - which will cost them an upfront fee of £1.68 million and an annual charge of £5.49 million.

    Although there has been no official confirmation from the FIA about the level of interest in the deal, with Mosley simply claiming last Friday that he had been contacted by three teams, investigations by autosport.com have revealed that half the grid are now seriously looking into it.

    Autosport.com understands that as well as wholly independent teams Williams and Force India having shown an interest, Red Bull Racing and Scuderia Toro Rosso have told the FIA that they are taking the option into consideration.

    But the biggest surprise is that French car manufacturer Renault is believed to have told the FIA that it too is interested in the supply of standard engines.

    Such a move would mark a significant departure for the car maker, who have supplied engines from their Viry-Chatillon base in France since they returned to F1 in 2001.

    However, with Renault having long faced financial pressures from their parent company to justify their involvement in F1, the prospect of a dramatic reduction in engine budget from 2010 may be enough to quell any unease that could lead to the French car manufacturer following Honda out of the sport.

    Renault boss Flavio Briatore was unavailable for comment about Renault's interest in standard engines, but did say at the season-closing Brazilian Grand Prix that power units were one area where big cost savings could be made.

    "I think we are in a very difficult position economically, what is going on around the globe and it's a panic at the moment," he said. "Formula One is not immune from this panic. I believe our chairman and everybody is very sensitive as to what happens in Formula One as well.

    "Regarding the question of the engines, sure we need to cut the costs but for me, all this discussion about Formula One engines, already today, with frozen engines, theoretically there is no development. I don't understand all the time how it's surprising when people are talking about engine development etc.

    "Already today we have no performance (gains) from the engine. If everybody follows the rules, the engine is frozen and nobody is allowed to touch the engine. Whatever proposal we put together, we need to take into consideration this as well."

    The FIA has made it clear that it will not force manufacturers to run a standard engine from 2010, but Mosley said in last week's letter than any car maker's own power unit will have its performance pegged to that of the standard engine.

    With no performance differentiation between the different types of engines, Briatore may have felt that there was little point in Renault continuing to fund a full-scale engine programme for tens of millions of pounds, when there is a fully-competitive option for less than £6 million.

    Mosley is due to meet with FOTA representatives in Monaco on Wednesday to discuss the latest raft of cost-cutting ideas for implementation next year and 2010.

    He has already hinted that measures being proposed by the teams do not go far enough and, with an added urgency to bring budgets down in the wake of Honda's withdrawal, there could be some fraught discussions about what needs to be done.

    After Thursday's deadline for standard engines, the FIA World Motor Sport Council will meet on Friday, with Formula One cost cuts believed to be the main item on the agenda.

    It is expected that the meeting will rubber stamp any rules proposals coming out of the FOTA meeting, as well as the standard engine plans.
     
  2. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,692
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    So, F1 will be"powered by Ford? ;)
     
  3. yzee

    yzee F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Apr 16, 2005
    9,145
    Bodegata
    Full Name:
    Michael
    They stole Tony George's idea!
     
  4. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    Wow! - Renault!..... I thought they were on record as saying "screw the standard motor"....

    I don't have a problem with Cosworth powering half the field - In fact, I have very fond memories of the DFV in virtually all the cars.

    But "pegging the performance" of any other manufacturers lumps is ludicrous IMHO - Let 'em at it and may the best team win! [Remember when Ferrari had tons of power, but the cars were, basically, crap?]

    What concerns me more is its starting to look like the FOTA is, once again, going to be divided when going to see Mad Max in the headmasters office. He'll trample all over 'em (again) and get his crazy plans through unless they stand united.

    My 02c,
    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  5. sindo308qv

    sindo308qv F1 Rookie

    Nov 1, 2003
    3,575
    miami.fl.
    Full Name:
    sindo
    It's all posturing. As soon as Ferrari and McLaren pull out,
    there's no F1, then we'll see what Max settles for.
     
  6. pdavid

    pdavid Karting

    Dec 15, 2005
    206
    If there is an engine freeze then why is there a need to have a FULL engine program?
    Don't you simply need to manufacture/test the same 2.4 V8 at that point?

    The R&D for all the little loopholes teams know about probably cost more than the manufacturing of the engine alone.
     
  7. kraftwerk

    kraftwerk Two Time F1 World Champ

    May 12, 2007
    26,826
    England North West
    Full Name:
    Steve
    Agreed Ian.
     
  8. kraftwerk

    kraftwerk Two Time F1 World Champ

    May 12, 2007
    26,826
    England North West
    Full Name:
    Steve
    Max is a clever ba$tard and won't let that happen, he is appeasing them, they can use there own motors ,albeit restrainted!

    The best we can hope for as Andreas has pointed out is, lets hope for grey area's where they can succeed, the only trouble I see with this is, as soon as Ferrari or Mclaren or whoever running there own motor gets a run away lead, they get there motor deemed to good and found to be illegal, Hence great scripting of the show again.
     
  9. GrndLkNatv

    GrndLkNatv Formula Junior

    Sep 13, 2006
    878
    Grand Lake, Colorado
    Full Name:
    Mark Stephens
    An easier way out of this mess is to offer the other teams Toyota/Mercedes/Ferrari engines at half the cost of the Cosworth engine, thus putting them out of business. It would be loss leader for the manufacturers but more profitable in the long run.
     
  10. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    The other thing we're overlooking, for once anyway (!), is that Ferrari & McLaren can't agree on the time of day.

    As stated, MM is a *really* sharp person (*) He's made his living by utilising a "divide & conquer" approach - I'll say it again, until FOTA can stand 100% united he's going to cane them (pun intended). Hell, he was *condemned* by some of most powerful people around and came through.....

    Cheers,
    Ian
    (*) - I couldn't get another word than "person" in there that the parser didn't keep ****'ing out! ;)
     
  11. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    That's a nice attitude! :D Makes no sense IMHO.

    ~7.5M per year for the "garragisti" is a good deal - Cosworth is a *proven* entity that (along with Ford in the early days) pretty much kept F1 grids full.

    Any F1 team could get motors, or you could build your own (IIRC, for many years, at different times, Ferrari was the *sole* builder of it's own motors.)

    Furthermore, there is nothing to stop, STR for example buying anyone's engine - I believe Force India have changed suppliers this off season for example.

    Hopefully, MM will get Cosworth in to the game with, say, 4 teams. Then the big 3 you mentioned will each supply one other team (Any more and they tend to whine about the "effort" being too much - Poor little darlings....)

    My 02c,
    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  12. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Mar 24, 2008
    42,999
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas
    I dont see it as such a bad thing per se. It allows teams with a low budget to spend much more of their pennies on car design, which hopefully allows more teams to be competitive.
     
  13. kraftwerk

    kraftwerk Two Time F1 World Champ

    May 12, 2007
    26,826
    England North West
    Full Name:
    Steve
    I get the bit that more teams can compete, but I'm worried when this spec-ing up will end, I would prefer a budget cap on the bigger teams, thus giving smaller teams the chance to compete with smaller budgets.

    You could argue constantly changing things trying to cut costs actually increases costs, and this I'm fed up with.

    Now KERS is for the time being been left open to the teams to get the best out of it, and I suppose this will be the difference giving a edge to the team that has developed or gets the best out of the unit, also I would imagine it would be hard to copy a KERS unit unlike taking photos of aero stuff, that is until such a time they become standard or banned..:(

    I still say limit the budget let the teams do what the hell they want with the money, blow it on beer if they want, its there money to waste, and let them race uninterrupted by all the bollox of you can't do this and you can't do that.

    I suppose I'm a geek, I like all the tech and development stuff, but maybe the majority don't care and wouldn't even know if all the cars are the same.
     
  14. GrndLkNatv

    GrndLkNatv Formula Junior

    Sep 13, 2006
    878
    Grand Lake, Colorado
    Full Name:
    Mark Stephens
    What makes sense is leaving F1 alone instead of destroying it with a spec series of racing that nobody will watch. IRL sucks, it's a joke, I pray that F1 will not follow that same road to he...
     
  15. Jack-the-lad

    Jack-the-lad Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    The manufacturers should just give The Dwarf and Mad Max the finger and form their own series.

    Jack.
     
  16. indy-25

    indy-25 Karting

    Nov 19, 2006
    86
    So instead of the teams being able to spend the money the engine development over the winter break to give possible 4 week races the Firetards decided to add KERS to the equation. Standard engines would lower costs but with the combination of KERS the costs are still going to be higher. I agree with the others and say they should just disban and recreate a new league maybe called BMS1, (bernie and max suck).
     
  17. opus10583

    opus10583 Formula 3

    Dec 3, 2003
    1,779
    Westchester, NY
    Full Name:
    Mark
    R.I.P. Formula One.

    It's been on life support since the NASCAR-style spec engine rules, but the merciful thing to do now is to quickly pull the plug.
     
  18. Remy Zero

    Remy Zero Two Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 26, 2005
    23,478
    KL, Malaysia
    Full Name:
    MC Cool Breeze
    looks like the end of F1 is pretty near for me.
     
  19. jknight

    jknight F1 Veteran

    Oct 30, 2004
    7,821
    Central Texas
    #19 jknight, Dec 9, 2008
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2008
    I was a bit surprised by the response from Renault to the standard engine. Looks like F1 Indy Style is coming in 09. Such a shame for what purports to be the "pinnacle" of motorsports. (GT2 in ALMS, LMS looks to be the biggest thrill of '09!)

    Carol
     
  20. rdefabri

    rdefabri Three Time F1 World Champ

    Jun 4, 2008
    33,571
    NJ
    Full Name:
    Rich
    No - Kevin Kalkhoven and Gerry Forsythe purchased Cosworth from Ford as a supplier to Champ Car (which they also owned).

    Again, no. Not to rant on about TG, but he's rarely had a good or original idea. It was Kalkhoven and Forsythe that promoted the idea of a spec series with Champ Car. For a short time, it looked to be a good idea, but internal strife caused them to sell out to Tony George. Tony wanted engine manufacturers to compete (a la Toyota and Honda), which frankly caused the demise of both CART and the IRL IMHO. If it weren't for Honda (and they are rumored to be leaving), the IRL would be dead. In fact, Kalkhoven has made a move to buy back all the turbo Cossie engines liquidated from his sell off to Tony in order to keep a supply handy, just in case Honda leaves.

    I totally agree, but not because of spec engines. It sucks because it's a) mostly oval racing b) there's no strong names (too many Marty Roths and field fillers) c) the cars are butt ugly... I could go on, but I don't think it has anything to do with spec engines.

    If F1 retains the driver quality (and it does a good job of promoting the names) and the historic constructors (and I mean primarily Ferrari, McLaren, and Williams), I see no issue with Max's proposal. I personally would take it further and get the cars looking a little more like the late 80's / early 90's variants, which would reduce the aero dependence and make them far easier to look at/lust after.

    FWIW
     
  21. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Mar 24, 2008
    42,999
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas
    Actually steve, I've never looked at it from that side, setting a maximum of what teams can spend annually makes much more sense.

    But i think there are way to many loopholes that way though...

    With the 500 orso million a team like ferrari or mclaren has to spend annualy, I'm correct in saying that salaries of the drivers and the other high functions are included right? They can already cut about 80 million by telling massa and kimi that they 'only' recieve a million each for racing. But the rest of their normal salary is made by testing new road going Ferrari's.
     
  22. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,692
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    Thanks for the clarification. I try not to let the facts get in the way of a good line:)
     
  23. rdefabri

    rdefabri Three Time F1 World Champ

    Jun 4, 2008
    33,571
    NJ
    Full Name:
    Rich
    No worries - it was a good line! ;)
     
  24. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,692
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    Then my work here is done.
     
  25. GrndLkNatv

    GrndLkNatv Formula Junior

    Sep 13, 2006
    878
    Grand Lake, Colorado
    Full Name:
    Mark Stephens

    I along with many others, in fact most likely the majority, are not going to watch a Ferrari with a stinking Cosworth engine in it... No self respecting Mercedes/McLaren fan will watch their car with a stinking Cosworth engine in it... It's not F1 without F1 engines from F1 manufacturers, it's GP2... F1 will be dead soon if this continues and all the paramedics in the world won't be able to revive it...
     

Share This Page