I once dated a beautiful, extremely charming woman. She honestly did not know that image is not what makes meaningful relationships. She asked me, point blank..."As a man, can you tell me how such homely women get such nice looking men?" (we were at the pool) She was serious as a heart attack. I just said, "I really don't know, I guess it has something to do with the ol saying that beauty is only skin deep". You could see the wheels turning in her head. Tryin' to figure out wtf that meant.
Did she ever figure it out? One thing is that you have to go to bed at night and wake up in the morning with a woman. They don't cover themselves in makeup and designer wears at that time.
Funny Thread this one is. I spend all of my efforts hiding my money. I want to actually meet someone with substance and the whole package. Date in my pickup truck until I feel they might work out. The beauty of woman like this one makes it real easy to F them and send them away. She (if real) needs to get her head out of her ars and wake up. I've done the whole 20 something scene and if she (if real) needs to come up with something to say intelligently. With no life experience her tight ars and tight tits will only get her laid.
Which is where this website that I just saw advertised on urbandictionary.com comes in handy: http://www.seekingmillionaire.com/
Dear Sir, I must confess that I was somewhat taken aback upon reading your email. Indeed, it has taken some time for me to sufficiently recuperate from my surprise. Lest your confidence quickly inflate for little reason (as we know is the predisposition for Wall St. types), allow me to hasten to reassure you that the source of my surprise was neither your candor nor the accuracy of your perception. Indeed, it is your "claimed" success in light of your poor grasp of economics which has me baffled. If the standards required to meet with financial success on Wall St. have sunk so low, perhaps I should indeed "make my own money", except for the fact that the effort/reward ratio is far too high for my liking - especially when so many of your ilk have displayed a far more cogent grasp of market realities than you have. By now you are likely scratching your ever-vanishing hairline in confusion, so allow me to elaborate, dear man. To build some credibility I will tell you a bit more about yourself. Though you did not mention the details of your occupation, it is clear that you are an investment banker and not a trader, as any good trader would understand that human courtships are based upon a semi-efficient open market, and not an investment banking cartel. However, your inability to grasp the realities of the dating market is not surprising, given that you have successfully employed the tools of collusion and market manipulation rather that true acumen in your supposed wealth generation. If your grasp of finance were not a minority partner with your ego, you would realize that the "outflows" associated with my depreciating "assets" are quite certain, and therefore subject to a low discount rate when determining their present value. In addition, though your concept of economics evidentially failed to move past the 1950s, advancement in plastic surgery is not subject to the same limitation. Thus, with some additional capital expenditure, the overall lifetime of "outflows" generated by these assets is greatly increased. Sad that Ashton Kutcher has demonstrated understanding of the female asset class which you, in all of your financial "wisdom", have not. You, on the other hand, are, given the uncertainty of the Wall St. job market, more of an inflation-indexed junk bond with an underwater nested call option. Though you may argue that you are more of an equity investment, my monetary minimums required from you do not change, and if you are unable to pay them, I will liquidate you without the benefit of a chapter 11, just as you would me. Because your outflows are so much more uncertain with respect to mine, I require additional compensation in the form of a underwater nested call option on your future assets. I say underwater because, even taking into account the value of your junk bond coupon payment to me, the value of my "outflow" is in excess of the market price of your equity (which is quite low due to its riskiness associated with your poor grasp of finance and my existing claim upon your junk bond coupon). I must thank you though for raising the question, despite the reputation cost of subjecting your weak logic to such widespread scrutiny. This took either considerable courage or ignorance on your part- and we'll give you the benefit of doubt, just this once. My current boyfriend (a trader who lives in Central Park West, of course) and I thoroughly enjoyed discussing your response and we wish you the best of luck in your unhappy pursuit of that elusive market inefficiency. http://losangeles.craigslist.org/about/best/nyc/445962092.html
I call B.S. that woman #1 penned such a response as this.....furthermore, its mostly gibberish and utterly fails to convince.
I know an example of these May/December (or is it dollar/penny?) relationships. Guy was recently divorced mid-40's, girl was 19-20 and pretty hot. Apparently even more impressive and enthusiastic in bed (or car or restaurant) by his descriptions. She received nice things, got to go with him when he took his jet around the country, and generally saw a side of life she otherwise would never had been privy to given her humble background. He got to do virtually anything he wanted, anytime he wanted, anywhere he wanted with a girl way hotter than his ugly a$$ would ever have a chance with without his money. My wife was aghast at his behavior. I told her "you know why he dates a teenager?...because he can." So I ask you who took advantage of who in this scenario? Seems the relationship was mutually beneficial to both. They both got what they wanted, and it only cost them a little bit of themselves.
What's great is the girl is an "out-of-work actress". Then you read her statements in the article and you have to laugh at the fact she uses "you know" like a 13-year-old teen. Sounds like a dumb one (if you watch the video). Also, a half of a million dollars (before taxes) can go pretty quick.
