308 V12 conversion begins | Page 98 | FerrariChat

308 V12 conversion begins

Discussion in '308/328' started by mk e, Oct 9, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. f308jack

    f308jack F1 Rookie

    Jun 7, 2007
    4,300
    Cape Town, South Afr
    Full Name:
    Jack Verschuur
    There's a new one to me: what is a cam doctor?
     
  2. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,820
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    #2427 mk e, Jun 19, 2009
    Last edited: Jun 19, 2009
    It measures a cam lobe. There are a couple versions of this type machine, but you put the cam in and the machine rotates it while measuring the lift. You get a printout of lift vs angle in 1 degree steps. It’s really the only way to know for sure what the cam actually is. You can make a pretty good guess of what the cam is from the lift, .050” duration and .006” duration (seat to seat), but it’s still a guess and there can be significant differences in 2 cams with what appear to be the same specs and that can result in 10% + variations in engine hp from what appeared to be the same cams.

    A machine like a cam doctor takes the guess work out of the lobe shape. Then the simulation software imports that lobe shape and takes most of the guess work out of how the cam will act in the engine. So once the cam guy finds a couple options that look like they are right I’ll have him grind a test lobe and get them measure and plugged into dynomation and see what works the best.

    My how engine building has changed in the past 10-15 years…….
     
  3. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,820
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    I spent some time looking over the manual and software for the new haltech platinum 2000 sport….and I was a little disappointed. The first version out was the “platinum 350Z pro” and it has some cool stuff, but as the name implies the basic set-up is factory configured for the 350Z and that can’t be changed.

    I expected the generic version to have all the cool stuff and be configurable….I expected wrong. It has no wide band O2 (it will accept input from an external controller), no injector trim tables, no traction control features….it’s appears to be not really new at all but more like an E11V3 as it’s basically an E11V2 with some minor upgrades.

    They have done a lot of work on the software and it’s truly windows software now. It connects by a USB not a serial port that has been nearly impossible to get on a laptop for 10 years now so that’s all good. I just can’t understand why the cool stuff is out though….unless they are planning to offer it as a Platinum 2000 PRO vs the entry level “sport” version.

    I’m back to not having a clear ECU plan. The best option is probably 2 motec M800s (at$3k each) then both fitted with the $500 ignition expanders, the $500 12 injector enable, the $750 wide-band O2 enable, the $500 data log enable and the $500 traction control enable and then 12 $50 ignition modules bringing the grant total to a completely unacceptable $11100. Oh I forgot about $1000 in plugs and cables. This is not going to happen.

    The haltechs option is still available but I’m not as happier any more. I was really looking forward to injector trim tables but the bigger concern though is 4 exhaust headers and only 2 O2 sensors means The Ecus will only be seeing ½ the picture in closed loop mode. Also I have to run distributors which isn’t terrible and looks period correct but means I have to make something up or buy them (my heads came with nothing). So I’m looking at 2 ECUs at $1800 each, 2 ignition modules at $50 each or more likely a couple $300 MSD or similar boxes, and 2 wide-band O2 divers at $500 each making this about a $5200 option.

    The VEMS option is still there too. 3 ecus would give me enough drivers, but bugger the closed loop operation because I will have 4 exhaust systems so ecus would be sharing headers making O2 reading meaningless. I would have to use 4 of them at $600 each to get 4 wide-band o2 sensors and keep separate control of the separate header groups . Again I need say $1000 in plugs and cables but it has enough built in ignition modules for true direct-fire coil on plug and the total is $3400. The maps are now 14x16 which should be enough to get a good tune, but it’s a concern as motec is 22x40 and haltech is 32x32….a naturally aspirated engine less points are required so 14x16 is probably enough.

    I’m hoping I’ll be needing to make a decision next spring……..
     
  4. Mike Florio

    Mike Florio Formula Junior

    Jun 19, 2003
    599
    NW Rural Nevada
    Full Name:
    Mike Florio
    I have free access to a Cam Doctor if necessary. Just PM me...
    And keep up the good work, this thread has been fascinating.
     
  5. 328turbo

    328turbo Formula Junior

    Jun 15, 2009
    306
    nyc
    #2430 328turbo, Jun 19, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    incredible!!!!!!!

    this thread can be turned into a book!
    not to bring anyone down or anything, but wouldnt it be easier to by pass all the engine work by transplanting the engine from a 456 or 550 into the 308 transaxle?

    very informative post that really shows off some big-time fabrication skills.
    i hope to see this car complete and operable real soon!

    any ideas for the 308 motor?????????????
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  6. Hans

    Hans F1 Veteran

    Feb 17, 2006
    7,734
    Hilversum, Netherlands
    Full Name:
    Hans Teijgeler
    Have you looked at the ViPEC V88 yet?


     
  7. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,820
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    I just did. 8 fuel, 8 ignition channels. I'd need 4 of them.
     
  8. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,820
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    #2433 mk e, Jun 19, 2009
    Last edited: Jun 19, 2009
    Yeh….there are a lot of things that would have been easier, like a manned mission to mars for example :D

    The easy way to get a v12 308 is a TR drive train I think. You lose the trunk but save 2-3 years of work.
     
  9. tknobby

    tknobby Rookie

    Mar 12, 2009
    49
    Mark, have you contacted SDS? http://sdsefi.com/ Their web site is pretty wordy. Maybe a phone call? I'm leaning heavily in their direction.

    There's got to be something cool out there for you to use.

    T...

     
  10. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,820
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    Just looked and it doesn't seem to be really configured in a way that would handle what I want to do.

    The problem is I'm asking for an awful lot here and there are not a lot of units flexible enough to do what I want to do. Most units aim at feature that cover the majority of applications in the name of simplifying the set-up.....and a 9500 rpm v12 with 24 staged sequentail injectors and COP is not easy or anything like common.
     
  11. 246tasman

    246tasman Formula 3

    Jun 21, 2007
    1,448
    UK
    Full Name:
    Will Tomkins
    #2436 246tasman, Jun 20, 2009
    Last edited: Jun 20, 2009
    Mark

    I still don't understand why you have to have sequential injection. Did I mention that I used a non sequential 6 cyl DTA ecu (about $1000 from memory) on my 575 and the engine was so smooth that it didn't even shake off a couple of loose nuts on horizontal studs that had been overlooked through all the dyno runs? I don't see why this shouldn't fire the 2nd set of injectors too. I imagine the low down torque you will have will be far more than you can use at low throttle openings and will have to be backed off anyway unless you design a variable geometry connection between the gas pedal & throttles.

    It's true we haven't run the car on the road/track yet but I can't imagine it will be anything but smooth. ETA for completion is 2 months and I hope I can then
    confirm.

    W
     
  12. randyleepublic

    randyleepublic Formula Junior

    Dec 2, 2007
    825
    Beautiful Reno
  13. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,820
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    I didn not know that. Thank you.

    I have a usb to serial adapter that got mostly work but it isn't perfect, it sounds like the card it the way to go.
     
  14. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,820
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    You are probably right when I say "need sequential” the "need" part is probably too strong a word. I think I’m basically taking the better safe than sorry approach. I’ve run many things with simply multipoint injection over the years and as you say they ran fine. I ran my QV engine both ways and in the sequential mode there was a noticeable difference in low end smoothness. A V12 so inherently smooth the difference would probably not be noticeable on a stock engine…..but I don’t have a stock engine I have port that are twice as big and cams with 30 degrees more duration and that makes idle and low end fuel control pretty difficult with multipoint injection.

    Once you make the jump to sequential there is so hp to be had too. With multi point you normally size the injectors to be at about 85% duty cycle. That give you the best low end control and also means the injector are on are basically all the time so it doesn’t matter that they are technically out of time on most of the cylinders. What I’ll be doing is running a very small injector for low end fuel and a large injector for top end fuel that will be under a 60% duty cycle. The short duty cycle means most of the fuel is flowing when the air it actually moving allowing it to mix a lot better giving better which in turn lowers the fuel consumption and increases the hp a little…and every little bit helps :)

    The throttle will be a progressive linkage design to make off idle throttle control possible…..that is the down side to the huge TBs I fitted in the name of flow and hp, they let in a LOT of air at just a touch of the throttle so progressive linkage is pretty much mandatory or it would be completely undriveable. Your TBs are sized a lot more reasonably and should have this probelm.
     
  15. 246tasman

    246tasman Formula 3

    Jun 21, 2007
    1,448
    UK
    Full Name:
    Will Tomkins
    I can see where you're coming from, but I think you might never notice the difference, (apart from that warm glow of knowing you've done everything possible).
     
  16. Hans

    Hans F1 Veteran

    Feb 17, 2006
    7,734
    Hilversum, Netherlands
    Full Name:
    Hans Teijgeler
    Well, they're cheap (around $1000 each)...

    Other than 8 fuel and 8 ignition channels, the units have a bunch of other outputs. They might be configurable as extra fuel outputs... By all means, contact the guys at ViPEC. These guys tend to go the extra mile for interesting projects... I'd say yours qualifies as such ;)
     
  17. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,820
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    You might be right but I just don't want to take any chances of deciding it needs to be a do-over. The controls make or break the project and if I had $10k I would just by the motec stuff and not give it a second thought because they work. For a track car what I;m taking about is without question overkill, but on the street......I don't know, race engines can be hard to tame for street use.
     
  18. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,820
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    We'll see.....I still have some time. I want to have a plan so I can get all the right wires in place before the engine goes, so probably 2-3 weeks before I need to decide anything :)
     
  19. randyleepublic

    randyleepublic Formula Junior

    Dec 2, 2007
    825
    Beautiful Reno
    You are, of course, very welcome. If you like, I'd be happy to dig a little and see if I can come up with a recommended brand, model, and supplier.

    Does your laptop have a standard PCMCIA slot?
     
  20. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,820
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    If you could recommend something that would be great. I'll need to connect to a haltech E8 for the EFI job I'm finishing up in the next week or 2 and I've been dreading it because of the serial port issue. I've still got my old laptop sitting here and not on ebay being turned into v12 parts becasue I know I've had the usb to serial adapter working on that machine and I have no idea if it will work on the new machine.

    My old laptop in a PCMCIA but the new one is an express card slot so express is what I'd be looking for I guess.

    This was one of the strikes against the VEMs ecu too, but if there is an easy answer I can take that off the list.
     
  21. randyleepublic

    randyleepublic Formula Junior

    Dec 2, 2007
    825
    Beautiful Reno
    I did some research. Apparently the standards for these things are "fuzzy" as the same card will have both successes with one device and failures with another. I found a manufacturer who sells direct to the public, and wrote to inquire as to their return policy. If it is reasonable, I will recommend. If not, back to the drawing board.
     
  22. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,820
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    Sounds like the USB to serial adapter world. I bought one and it was useless, the IT guys at work swapted me for one they had and it worked fine....after I found a driver for it because nobody could remember what exactly it was.

    Let me know what you find out.
     
  23. randyleepublic

    randyleepublic Formula Junior

    Dec 2, 2007
    825
    Beautiful Reno
    This one looks good. http://www.synchrotech.com/products-expc/expresscard_34_serial_rs232_adapter_01.html

    Their employee:

    Eric Hartouni - Ext. 101

    Skype Acct: Synchrotech-Eric

    [email protected]
    http://www.synchrotech.com

    Synchrotech, Inc.
    3333 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 806
    Los Angeles, CA 90010
    USA
    Tel: 213-368-3760
    Fax: 213-368-3765

    He said that you would have 30 days to test and return.

    I wrote another guy. He told me that typically the problem is what you would call a "COM port" conflict. A device, such as an ECU, will demand to communicate over COM1 or COM2. But, modern PCs use those ports for other stuff like the mouse and those are hard assignments, so no connecty. The ECU software should either automatically attach to the first open port, or they should allow you to assign the number. When you have a chance, why don't you ask them what their software's COM port requirement is.
     
  24. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,820
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    Thanks!

    The software is com1 by default but will accept com 3 in the setup....I remember I had to change that and then tell the computer the adapter was com in 3 to connect.

    Now this being a vista machine what should be easy never seems to be.....we'll see :)
     
  25. randyleepublic

    randyleepublic Formula Junior

    Dec 2, 2007
    825
    Beautiful Reno
    Vista! Ewwww!

    Spare yourself a lot of grief and downgrade to XP. Or did you get one of those swell no-XP-drivers deals?

    Oh well, you know we are all here to help in whatever teeny tiny way we can... :)
     

Share This Page