BOXER V TESTAROSSA | FerrariChat

BOXER V TESTAROSSA

Discussion in 'Boxers/TR/M' started by johnvwatts, Apr 11, 2010.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. johnvwatts

    johnvwatts Formula Junior

    Jul 7, 2007
    522
    England
    Full Name:
    John v watts
    I was thinking of adding a testarossa to my garage and wondered how it compares to say a carb boxer - a car I am familiar with. Eg handling , throttle response compared to the carb car and general acceleration. Also problems (other than the dreaded crown wheel and pinnion) . Was probably thinking of circa an 89/90 car with the 16inch wheels.

    Has anyone owned or owns both?
     
  2. Mario Pano

    Mario Pano Formula Junior

    May 24, 2006
    273
    Where ever fun goes
    Full Name:
    Mario
    I used to own one same time with the Boxer and I even run them against each other side by side.
    My Boxer is an 84 totally stock so was the testarossa both with miles below 10k and both running perfect when tested........the Boxer was much faster of the line and stayed faster all the way up to the first triple digit speeds
    The boxer was also much more responsive and a better handling car at medium speed mountain road turns.
    Testarossa felt more planted straight line at insane speeds but the Boxer got this feel also after some minor suspension mods like a little more spring rate and ride height set at factory specs with two normal weight people in it.(Boxer was sitting too tall while stock and all original)
    The Boxer with all its documented paper work was running in european trim ...no cats etc where the testarossa was late year production us car
    Testarossa is a much heavier car than the Boxer and maybe if I remember right it could have been a little taller geared but not sure on this last point.
    Had the Testarossa for a year and a half and the Boxer for 18 plus now I think....I loose count.


    Mario
     
  3. johnvwatts

    johnvwatts Formula Junior

    Jul 7, 2007
    522
    England
    Full Name:
    John v watts
    Interesting - the weight of the testarossa obviously counts against it and of course the gearing. I don't know why but I was expecting it to be quicker if anything. Perhaps I should organise a test drive first (!). Thanks for the response.
     
  4. Newman

    Newman F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner Professional Ferrari Technician

    Dec 26, 2001
    14,414
    Canada
    Full Name:
    Newman
    The boxer is smaller and feels it when compared to the TR. The 90 TR I drove felt slower than my boxer, less responsive and bulky. My car is full euro and the TR was US spec which means more weight and 10 less HP than the euro version TR would be. I still love the look of the TR, big fat ass and low plus it sounds great and its no slug.
     
  5. RP

    RP F1 World Champ

    Feb 9, 2005
    17,667
    Bocahuahua, Florxico
    Full Name:
    Tone Def
    It also comes down to which design/style you prefer. The classic BB or the more dramatic TR. Since I am old, I like the BB.
     
  6. AHudson

    AHudson F1 Rookie
    Rossa Subscribed

    Jul 7, 2005
    2,781
    Florida
    Full Name:
    Adams Hudson
    #6 AHudson, Apr 12, 2010
    Last edited: Apr 12, 2010
    I still prefer the looks of the Boxer, but that's not what you asked. I have no experience with the 'early' Testarossa, just the 512TR.

    My BBi just feels more like a 'sports car' and less like a 'big wide GT' than the 512TR if that makes any sense. The feeling is more raw, more connected, better steering feedback. I put 6 new shocks on my car and some of the former 'floaty' feeling vanished.

    Yet my experience says the 512TR is vastly quicker, faster, (an advertisted 421 hp vs 340) and more stable car. Decent amount more interior room, a pretty usable trunk too. (Last Saturday I put 2 cases of beer, 1 case of water and a couple small bags of groceries in the trunk. I was amazed. Couldn't/wouldn't do that in th Boxer.)

    In time, I have grown increasingly fond of the 512TR. The AC is ice cold, radio is nice enough, exhaust note makes the hair on my neck stand up (Tubi). It is certainly a 'wilder' looking car. In the BBi, I can ride around with not so many noticing, yet the 512Tr generally gets cell phone pics and gabbing of all sorts at gas stations.

    They make a great pair though! Within the Testarossa range, I'd talk to some technicians about the service histories between the Testarossa and the 512TR. Maybe spend some seat time in each. Though the price is a little ways different, your experience may be more rewarding. Just a thought.
     
  7. buzzm2005

    buzzm2005 Formula 3

    Aug 23, 2005
    1,739
    NYC
    Full Name:
    Buzz
    I sense another Boxer/TR smack down brewing! I'll get the popcorn.

    They are both great cars, the only flat 12s out there.
    The Boxer is a classic shape, very much hand built, and is the last of carbed cars.
    The Testarossa (esp the 512TR) is a dramatic shape, has next-gen build and bits like Bosch Motronic ECUs.
     
  8. donv

    donv Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Jan 5, 2002
    25,979
    Portland, Oregon
    Full Name:
    Don
    My brother owned an early TR from new until just a few years ago, and it was the first Ferrari I ever drove. He's also driven my Boxer, and is always telling me how much better the TR is...

    From a practical perspective, he's right. The TR has rear-mounted radiators, which eliminates the Boxer's unfortunate situation of blowing hot air over the cabin. It also allows it to have a usable trunk.

    However, the TR always felt much bigger to me than the Boxer, especially around town. I think the width has a lot to do with this.

    All in all, I wouldn't trade my Boxer for a TR.
     
  9. johnvwatts

    johnvwatts Formula Junior

    Jul 7, 2007
    522
    England
    Full Name:
    John v watts
    Hmm its looking like Boxer 6 Testarossa 0 at the mo.
     
  10. Testarossa Lover

    Testarossa Lover F1 Rookie
    Owner

    Dec 31, 2006
    3,622
    Newport Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Haig Barsamian
    Testarossa all the way. Cool A/C, great at top end, exotic. I love all F-Cars, my gone crazy and racked up 20K miles on my TR in the last three plus years... If you were to buy a TR, look for 1990 and get ready for you pic to be taken everytime you drive the car. Look in my profile for pic.
     
  11. blown daytona

    blown daytona Formula 3

    Feb 6, 2008
    1,679
    maryland
    Ditto.....Everytime I take out my TR, I can at least expect one cell phone pic to be taken. People are exited when they see it. The first Ferrari I drove was a boxer when I was in my 20's What a rush!!! I have always loved the look of the boxer. However I feel the TR is a more refined and improved version of the boxer. The TR today is just rough enough in this day and age to keep my attention. Unlike todays cars I feel like I have to drive it instead of feeling like I am just riding in it.
     
  12. johng

    johng Formula 3

    Oct 23, 2004
    2,298
    northern va
    Full Name:
    john g
    i think before you decide against a testarossa, try the euro version. most of the responses here come from US spec owners. i have owned two US cars, but no boxers, and i agree with the descriptions of the testarossa. however, the euro version is 350+ pounds lighter with a little more power so it will almost surely be a different comparison with the boxer. i find it hard to believe the euro testarossa will be slower or less capable, performance-wise, than a boxer. it doesn't make sense for a succeeding model to be slower than its predecessor.

    john
     
  13. AHudson

    AHudson F1 Rookie
    Rossa Subscribed

    Jul 7, 2005
    2,781
    Florida
    Full Name:
    Adams Hudson
    I hope you weren't counting my post as a "+1" on the Boxer! Mine is equally split, depending on your goals.

    If your goals include driving more, in more comfort, with a bit more attention, and a faster (512TR) more civilised car, the redhead wins.

    If a beauty or rarity contest, the BB. A tough call, depending purely on merits desired.
     
  14. donv

    donv Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Jan 5, 2002
    25,979
    Portland, Oregon
    Full Name:
    Don
    Me too. My brother would clearly be in the TR camp, and while I would agree that objectively the TR is superior, I like the Boxer anyway.

     
  15. Newman

    Newman F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner Professional Ferrari Technician

    Dec 26, 2001
    14,414
    Canada
    Full Name:
    Newman
    Buy the car based on how it makes you feel, not how many donkeys take your picture when you go out in it. If anything, that kind of attention would steer me away from a car because driving it, not posing for pics is what im into. Bought my boxer because its special, rare, cool, fast and its not depreciating.
     
  16. Rifledriver

    Rifledriver Three Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 29, 2004
    36,911
    Cowboy Capitol of the World
    Full Name:
    Brian Crall
    Very different cars. Like Newman said, buy the one that works for you.


    BB does feel smaller, lighter and more responsive. TR is a much better car to travel in. HVAC is far better, quieter and more comfortable. TR is much more stable at high speed which was one of the prime goals when designed.

    BB is a better mountain road car, TR is a better open road car.
     
  17. ferraripete

    ferraripete F1 World Champ

    i am a boxer owner / lover...but i must say the 512tr is looking better and better to me w/ each new day!

    i don't know why but the 512tr looks considerably better than the other testarossa versions including the "m".
     
  18. Newman

    Newman F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner Professional Ferrari Technician

    Dec 26, 2001
    14,414
    Canada
    Full Name:
    Newman
    I agree and I love them both, two very different cars though.
     
  19. AHudson

    AHudson F1 Rookie
    Rossa Subscribed

    Jul 7, 2005
    2,781
    Florida
    Full Name:
    Adams Hudson
    Here's why: You have superior taste.
     
  20. Rifledriver

    Rifledriver Three Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 29, 2004
    36,911
    Cowboy Capitol of the World
    Full Name:
    Brian Crall
    Never liked the looks of the TR512. Looks like a fat hunchback.
     
    lagunacc likes this.
  21. wlanast

    wlanast Formula 3
    Owner

    Jan 9, 2007
    1,178
    Santa Ana,California
    Full Name:
    William
    I haven't owned both, only the BBi, but driven both. Ditto in that the TR feels more refined, plenty quick, still exciting viscerally, and what a difference more modern and bigger rubber make than the crappy TRX's.

    The driving quirks of the Boxer actually add to the experience for me, but most drivers will feel more confident behind the wheel of the TR. Very capable cars both, but you just don't worry as much that the TR will slap you if you do something silly behind the wheel. With the radiators and the engine/transaxle all behind you, you would think the TR would feel more tail heavy. Whether its the tires, longer wheelbase, or whatever, I never felt that the TR was uncomfortably prone to oversteer.

    Looks are more subjective, and while some design elements are inspiring and iconic, the front end of the whole series just didn't do it for me. I also like the more subtle beauty of the Boxer. The TR's sure get the looks, though.

    I have to believe the TR is also safer (relatively) than the Boxer, though I don't have a shred of evidence to support that. I do sometimes find myself worrying what would happen if I get into a scrape at any kind of speed in the Boxer. And it certainly changes how I drive with passengers.

    Good luck!
    W
     
  22. johng

    johng Formula 3

    Oct 23, 2004
    2,298
    northern va
    Full Name:
    john g
    that's the one thing that i've never liked about the 512. the rear pillars extend all the way back to the edge of the engine lid. really turns it into a hatchback-looking car. also, there is no slight dip from the roofline as there is in the original testarossa. i was trying to figure out the motivation for these changes, and finally found it in the boxer. it has the same flow from rear roofline to rear pillars all the way back to the edge of the engine lid. but for some reason on a boxer it doesn't give the hatchback look. the car looks great otherwise.
     
  23. WILLIAM H

    WILLIAM H Three Time F1 World Champ

    Nov 1, 2003
    35,532
    Victory Circle
    Full Name:
    HUBBSTER
    Sort of like comparing a Daytona to a Maranello

    Both awesome and related

    I love BBs they are super sexy, love 512TRs too

    I'd have both ideally :)
     
  24. Mario Pano

    Mario Pano Formula Junior

    May 24, 2006
    273
    Where ever fun goes
    Full Name:
    Mario
    I remember the day I looked at the first TR photo and I thought Ferrari lost their touch.
    Shortly after and to this day I feel the early TR looks great and in my opinion better than the later versions and even more so with the larger wheels like the later 512TRs have.
    I have driven both to long trips and if both running perfect I feel the BBi wins over where you feel you have been entertained after a long trip and never get enough of the feel the Boxer has.
    With 285-40-17s at the rear and 245s at the front the handling of the BB at corners of all speeds feels like a true race car on the street,I never got this thrill from the TR but I sure had the attention from people which I do not enjoy even when it happens with the BB
    The BB is sprung super soft and with more spring rate and stock fresh shocks with modern tires can be a great handler contrary to some peoples opinions.
    Much less weight can equal more power and there is several hundreds of pounds in difference I believe as I was told when I tried to explain why was the TR so much slower than the BB.
    I have gone once out of a demo in a 512TR and back to the Boxer and the best way to descibe it is the BB feels raw and nimble like a race car where even a fast late TR is just not such a thrill.

    Mario
     
  25. EMILIO

    EMILIO F1 Veteran

    Feb 23, 2006
    6,854
    Italia
    #25 EMILIO, Apr 14, 2010
    Last edited: Apr 14, 2010
    i vote BB for look, rarity. lightness
    to get the complete package, i would go for a weber car (the last old school ferrari!)

    a black or white BB is one of the best looking ferrari ever (imo)
    do not get me wrong: the TR is a great looking car but too heavy, it has some notorious weack mecanic points and they made too many cars

    you should consider diablo and countach to
    but the countach only if you like wild, uncompromised once in a weeck machine...it is so extreme that makes the BB a refined gran tourer ;)
     

Share This Page