Bottom cover removed. Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
Next we removed the oil filter thing. No idea what it's called. Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
All covers removed. I've been told it's a Ted Wenz crank. Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
Few more pics Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
There didn't seem to be any reason to delve further into the engine. All the parts looked new and unused except for the gaskets. There were also no head gaskets either. Other bits that I've done are to have the cam covers powder coated with a wrinkle finish. Also managed to find a set of metal cambelt covers at QV London and had them powder coated black. Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
I did not see the piston squirters, but did see an allen screw where the squirters are supposed to be installed.
That is some GREAT stuff Sy! It looks as though they modified the head to use 33mm valves, and the reliefs in those pistons are DEEP? Guess you have to have that much clearance with the size lobes that thing is running. Wondering if you could put a micrometer on those and give us the specs? Also how about the front cover for the oil pump chain? Did that just mount up normally, or does it look modified?
Good spot. I'll look into that and report back. Will measure everything up next time we do some work. Only thing we measured yesterday was the area of space the pistons used up. It was (from memory) 65mm wide and 84mm deep. I think from that you can work out the cc of the engine? No idea. What's a normal 355 cover look like?
Your engine looks wonderfull, I´ll hope that you could use it on the street later. Check this webpage, it´s from a Japanese engine specialist, maybe their headgasket could fit in your engine F129B. http://www.todaracingusa.com/F355_usa.pdf Please keep posting, I´m learning a lot with this thread. Regards.
Very nice workmanship! Don't waste your time looking for gaskets... that setup is extremely nice and very reliable. Cooper's rings with Orings, hails from the F1 and CanAm racing days. Exactly how the F50 is put together.... hell, maybe the same parts were used. If not I have some super secret sources I can share with you. You would have a dickens of a time having gaskets seal up with the rings in place regardless. I would suggest some very accurate CR tests at this point as you HAVE to know this for fuel specing and engine management programing. No better time than now and those combustion chambers look pretty shallow. No head gaskets and shallow chambers... could be approaching 14:1... you need to know this or the knock sensors will be activated constantly at idle. Re think some of this. You have to remember, its a race engine which amounts to the ultimate compromise. It was planned to be torn down / rebuilt every 10 hours Max. The tensioner is made from the early style that had a tendency to fail (in its original form) and wear out quickly (darker brown plastic). It didnt matter on an engine coming apart again soon, the chain wouldnt stretch that much between builds. For your uses it is easily justified, quite cheap and very reliable to put in the latest OEM style. Oil Cooling Jets were likely eliminated as that would throw the extra weight of oil on the pistons that wouldnt be required for an engine with a limited life design, they had shelves full of pistons and liners for a pro LM effort.... for your uses they would be an asset as that last 1.5 HP at redline isnt a make or break and you wont be hanging on the redline all day long. One need only price out having the pistons and liners re made for justification of installing those. Look closely at the pistons for a batch marking, I wonder if they are the same as the ones I am using. I had a friend at Cosworth at the time who researched what they had made for other teams and made me a few sets of those. I will photo a new extra I have and see if they appear identical. Any markings on the side of the rods near the parting line? As your use will be entirely different than what it was designed for you might want to consider putting back in some of these items for longevity. Making replacement parts is a humbling affair that might be able to be put off for a long time with them in place. I suggest you have further to go before reversing direction, you have a unique piece of history there.
Thanks for the info mecha355. Thanks Dave. Have forwarded it on to Raj as most the stuff is way over my head.
When Angelis and I e-mailed over this, I speculated this was a 40 hour engine (i.e. leMans is a 24 hour race + practice and cooldown lap). But at least we are in the same ball park. Now about those factory F348 cams--anyone have the timing numbers?
I see some pitting on a combustion chamber, as well as some dents on the crankshaft counterweights... Usually they stand for some past misaps... Are you aware of any?
Agreed. The life span in my opinion is based more on the cam belt and valve train than anything in the bottom end. Rods, pistons, liners, crank... all should last a fairly long time if everything remains intact at speed. My experiment of "how long will it last with XXX cams...?" Once I started feeling it fall out of time, I chickened out. I have far too much time and money in the engine to see what would survive when the belt didnt. I now feel I know how much is too much cam. It was interesting seeing that the bottom end would take more than I asked of it. It hammers out the main journals a bit on a few of the bearing saddles but that is expected with no harmonic balancer of any kind.
Raj noticed that as well. He seems to think that an errant conrod may have done it it. Could explain the complete rebuild. Looks like the engines are related.
The reason I desire F348 valve timing is illustrated as follows: At 8250 RPMs, the point of maximum power in the F355 engine, then, in order to move the peak power to higher RPMs, one needs to keep the exhaust (and intake by extrapolation) open just as long* as it was open at peak power. The following table emerges for the F355 engine: 7200 221 degrees 7500 229 7750 237 8000 244 8250 252 8500 260 8750 267 9000 275 9250 283 9500 290 Since this engine has an intake much more like that of the F355 (velocity stacks,...) tan the F348, it should (first order breath something more like the F355 and thus need cam timing more like the F355.) Thus for peak power nearer 9000 RPMs, where this engine will have a lot longer lifetime, you shold be looking for a duration of 275 degrees. With actual F348 cam timing I could figure this to a greater degree of accuracy. Also note, you will want the headers to have a length closer to 26"-27" than the 31" for the F355 and <I don't know what> for the F348 to get the full 9000 RPM power out of this thing. A 275 Cam would normaly end up being timed something like EO = 71-72 BBDC EC = 23-24 ATDC (which almost has a streetable overlap). But, F348 cam timings would do wonders for this calculation experiment.
Big thanks to fellow 348 owner Chris Gilmartin. He PM'd me about an anti-roll bar that was used on the 348 Le Mans car that John Pogson at Italia Autosport had. Turns out it's a copy of the one that was actually on the 348LM that my engine comes from and made by the same company that made the original. It's an adjustable rotating blade type anti-roll bar for the front. Item acquired and just waiting for it to be shipped. Had a very nice chat with John Pogson and I mentioned the Le Mans engine we are working on. Turns out John had driven the Simpson 348 LM and he says it will be great in a road car. The idle was steady but the power band was quite high. From 7,000 rpm onwards. You also have to keep an eye on the rev counter as it revved very very fast. If I recall correctly, he used the word "lethal" (in a good way) to describe the car/engine. And with all the modern tech we are using, it may end up being more powerful than the original Le Mans race car. Very excited. Can't wait to get behind the wheel and take it for a spin!!!
Great info here. i am currently rebuilding my heads and have flow tested them for a base line. OEM intakes are 30.5mm and are on the small side. OEM ex are 27.5mm and am planing to leave them. I am going to try and put 34mm intake valve in it and from the pics i see your LM heads have about that size. Are they 34mm sy? I'm glad to see it is posible. Has anyone experienced doing this that can shed some light on any problems encountered... such as going into water jackets? 1st pic is the LM head, 2nd pic is OEM head. Big difference in valve area here... Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
Also, is there enough meat in the stock pistons to relieve them for the bigger valves? I'm hoping the reliefs in Sy's pistons are so large because of cam lift....