That crank sprocket almost looks like it will work on the 308 as it is. Can you take some precise measurements on that for me or just see if it slides on to a 308 crank? ... then we'll worry about the overall length and seal diameter ... one less thing to make perhaps. edit: okay that is a pic of the 308 crank ... no wonder it looked so similar ... I was about to mention the flywheel flange looks the same as a 308 . So Mke has all the chain drive goodies for the 360 now? Thanks, Sean
Everything is a work , what the pic's tell is I do have them ! When you wake up tomorrow morning you will have a tooth count . I was going to try and use the 360 front pulley with the new belts , so I know it all just slides on 308 crank .
That is awesome Dave!!!! I'll post the overall length, seal diameter, and tooth thickness here in a bit (3/8" pitch "true roller" chain ... I'd be shocked if they changed that) ... might be close to a drop in for the 308 dry sump conversion ... now I just need to decide if I care how fast the pump is running if I go with the 360 pump sprocket. cheers
Sorry , one of my posts was a bit confusing !! When I said taken by Mark I meant the pic's !!! Edwardo tell me about FOX 11 is it on the net or off your TV ???
Ok first off appologies it was Bill Pound . Hope there is no copy right , but it's more than 10 years old and relavent to this thread . So Bill hope you don't mind me posting it ! Tech Tip - Dry Sumping 308s/328s By: Bill Pound Before I embark upon describing the dry sump system I developed for the 308/328, its important to recognize that there is nothing wrong with the stock system if the car is driven in the manner Ferrari designed it for. Ferrari never intended the 308 to be a competition car and, frankly, would probably prefer we did not monkey around with them. But since we are all Ferrari nuts, the 308/328 is the most logical and inexpensive model to play with, so we do. In the last issue we talked at length about the limited options available to remedy the oil pressure fluctuations in the 308/328-type motors on right-hand corners. Some owners say they do not have the problem but believe me, all these cars share this problem but the combination of not looking at the gauge constantly and the slow reaction time of the electric gauge may lead one to believe that everything is fine. During a 308 2V IMSA engine development program I undertook back in 1990, we built a Fuel Injected shortened 308 2V motor in North/South arrangement driving through a Hewland DGB transaxle. These motors were all converted to dry sump systems using a Weaver 3 stage pump for both pressure and scavenge. We later tried to adapt a lot of these high performance parts from this program to club racing cars, all using the standard Ferrari 308 ZF transaxle with the stock wet sump. We immediately ran into the oil surge problem. With power in the 325 bhp range and the subsequent increased bearing loads, the oil pressure took on a whole new meaning. The cost of dry sumping was at that time prohibitive and most of the early Ferrari dry sump stuff had been used up by all the guys running the Marenello Challenge series in the UK. Therefore, we decided to start with a clean sheet of paper and come up with something both inexpensive and effective to cure this oil problem. The result was a relatively simple solution. We simply used the standard Ferrari internal pump just to scavenge oil and fitted an external pump mounted to a special bracket mounted where the A/C compress normally goes to supply pressure. This extra pump is driven by a .750" toothed Gates Powergrip belt similar to the ones driving the camshafts. The belt is driven off a special drive mounted to the stock crankshaft damper. It leaves the original alternator/water pump belt in place. The system requires installation of a 9" dia oil tank in the trunk compartment. You will need to bore a hole in the rear fender well to the trunk large enough to pass two oil lines and a breather hose through. How it works: Oil in the tank is gravity fed to the external pump, which then supplies pressure to the engine through the oil filter housing as the standard pump does. Once about 3 quarts of oil are in the engine oil pan, the internal pump picks it up and pumps it back to the tank via the oil coolers. The Ferrari pump turning at 90% engine speed will scavenge all but 3 quarts of oil from the motor and will maintain a constant level in the tank. The external pump turning at just over 50% of engine speed has an extenal presure relief valve and will maintain up to 100 psi of oil pressure. Cost for complete kit is $2995, which includes everything needed (tank, pump, brackets, drive, lines, and instructions). It is available through Bill Pound at (909) 245-6017. For a complete look at Sempre Ferrari, you may want to check out the rest of the articles from Volume 4, Issue 1 - January 1997
Yep, just confirmed that the stock wet sump pump is all the way at 93% engine speed. The sprocket I have on my scavenge pump has 25 teeth ... crank sprocket has 18 teeth (same as factory) which gets me down to 72%. 22/18 is 82% if that's what the 360 pump sprocket is ... I think that would work. cheers all, Sean
I just counted the pins in the pic on the previous page ... looks like crank/pump is 19/19 ... maybe 18/19 ... maybe a speed increase 'cause of other gizmo's the pump needs to run? Very interesting that Ferrari appears to have no fear running the pumps at/near engine speed.
Promises promises , took the pic's now no lead to down load them . Don't you just love it !!!! Anyway crank sprocket 20 T , pump 19T . So it's over driven ?? Took a pic of the crank sprocket on a 308 crank , so it just slides on .
Dave, Thanks for the info ... there are a lot of constraints on the 308 timing cover leaving only room for an 18 tooth sprocket. The 19 tooth pump sprocket would give me a bit of reduction but I think I just need to knuckle down and make the sprockets from scratch. cheers
The pic's I promised Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
Been progressing slowly with my rebuild !!! BUT while installing the head studs I came across a stange one ( see pic ) Which made me realise the drysump blocks are more different than I thought !! This maybe common knowledge to most , but new to me !! At the beginning of my rebuild I thought I could convert a wetsump block to dry quite easily . So I proceeded to purchase a wetsump block and thought I was on my way . It turned out the block I bought didn't even have the boss on the side of the block where the oil exits the block back to the tank . Threw Fchat I found a drysump block in Canada and my problems were sorted . NOW I find their are a few more differences in the dry and wetsump blocks ( A wet sump block could be converted to dry , but it's more work than I thought ) There is an oilway drilled from the oilfilter housing down to a gallery and this passes next to one of the head studs !!! That's why the stud is half bored away . On a wet sump block this is not drilled . Although the block is cast such that it could be drilled . Take a look at the pic's . The oilfilter housing drillings are different . The one with a single hole is the wetsump block . Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
Hi Dave, Good to see progress. Wow, shows you how important it is to pay attention to detail. A partially blocked oil passage would have been a real head-scratcher later, and quite possibly the cause of a huge bill.
Thanks Sean, So my Wet-Sumped block is a Dry-Sump casting. Edwardo Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
Thanks for sharing Dave ... what the heck does that passage feed? Doesn't seem like it's necessary for a wet sump/dry sump conversion. Good for you Edwardo! cheers
It looks like that passage is the feed directly from the dry sump pressure section to the oil filter housing vs. the wet sump plumbing which exits the block and goes thru the oil cooler and then to the filter housing .... makes sense 'cause on the dry sump setup the scavenge sections pump the oil thru the cooler before going to the tank. Thanks again for sharing. cheers
Edwardo , most of the newer blocks have that boss . I got an early GT4 block without it !!!! Sean , I've never really paid much attention to the oil direction flow . But here's another point . In my race car day's we always put the oil through the cooler on the outlet ( pressure pump suction side )from the tank . Reason being that the scavenged oil is full of air until it goes into the tank where it is swirled to get rid of the air ! And oil full of air does not cool as well as airless oil ??? So I'll check it out in the morning at work . Be interesting to see if on the drysump motor the the oil is cooled on the scavenge side ??
From the exploded view I'm pretty sure it's the scavenge oil that gets cooled on the factory 308 dry sump setup but please confirm that. When I told one particular dry sump guy that I was going to plumb the pressure section thru the cooler like the wet sump system is he told me that was stupid ... one guy says black ... another guys says white ... ask one more person and he'll tell you red ... the air does concern me. I was really shocked at the size of the factory 308 dry sump tank. One of the pumps I have has a centrifugal air/oil seperator built into it which supposedly does a really good job of seperating the air/oil ... it's just waaaay to big to package in the 308 sump but one day I might take it apart and see if things could be shrunk down a bit. Thanks as always for sharing. cheers
Just saw your pic ... you made your own adjustable cogs ... good for you man! I've been messing with the pullies with new belt profile and I need to make some new tensioners to make "off the shelf" belt lengths work (sigh) ... not the end of the world but I really want to get this motor lit off already. I've got some pulley stock for the stock belt profile that I could make pullies out of that would work with the adjustable centers but would like to see the new belt profile thing thru since I think there might be a few people that still want to use those ... maybe? cheers