abandoning the ban | Page 2 | FerrariChat

abandoning the ban

Discussion in 'F1' started by Ferraripilot, Jul 9, 2011.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. SDC

    SDC Formula Junior

    Oct 13, 2006
    454
    My post did not mention Mclaren and their loss of performance. Thank you for posting a spoiler and ruining qualifying for the LEW HAM fan boys!
     
  2. SRT Mike

    SRT Mike Two Time F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    23,343
    Taxachusetts
    Full Name:
    Raymond Luxury Yacht
    I didn't post a spoiler - and you're *always* talking about McLaren.

    You should give some thought to the fact that most of the long-term and well respected members of this forum pretty much all consider you a troll.

    Either you care, in which case you will take steps to rectify the situation.

    Or you don't care, in which case you are a troll.
     
  3. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,693
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    I take it you've been following the discussion being held elsewhere.
     
  4. SSNISTR

    SSNISTR F1 Veteran

    Feb 13, 2004
    8,046
    SFL
    The FIA blows sometimes...
     
  5. SRT Mike

    SRT Mike Two Time F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    23,343
    Taxachusetts
    Full Name:
    Raymond Luxury Yacht
    DUDE! First rule of fight club!!!! :D
     
  6. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,693
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    Oops.
    :)
     
  7. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    :)

    You got me thinking - Again! :eek: ......

    I'm pretty sure what is now FOTA agreed, back in the bad old days of JMB and thence the Concorde, that *any* rule change needed to be unanimous..... An incredibly hard thing to achieve.....

    But, this is not a change, rather a clarification ;)

    Further, Charlie has what amounts to a "Charlie rule" that allows anything he chooses - Otherwise the FIA couldn't run the sport - FOTA knows that, and is why we generally have relative peace among the combatants.......

    However, I still won't accept that this BS is at the behest of Bernie (or whoever) wanting it to be the WWF. I still believe Charlie is trying to do what's right.

    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  8. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,693
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David


    Ian,
    I have had the greatest regard for Charlie as an honorable man operating among a nest of vipers but at this point the machinations speak for themselves.
    With the Concorde up for renegotiation the stakes (and pressures) are huge. Murdoch is looking to move on Bernie. The track owners are staking their claims, threatening to run Indy Cars. A radical new engine standard is being determined. Etc. Etc.
    The smell of blood is in the air and the knives are out. ;)

    "May you live in interesting times"
    Old Chinese curse.

    David
     
  9. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    OK. :)

    Indeed - That should probably be a new thread however....

    IIRC, "we" decided the Indy car thing probably gave the Pygmy a good laugh! :)

    "Engine standards", I learnt a while back, are pretty much voted on by the stake holders - Seems it's what they want - Not a 4, but a V6 - Multinational Co's and huge ego's are agreeing on something that fundamental... ;)


    :)

    While true, I still don't think this ****-storm is a conspiracy.

    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  10. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,693
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    No conspiracy. Just a bunch of independent actors looking to position themselves favorably for the redistribution.
    . As fans we tend not to focus on the bigger picture. F1 is a mega business first and foremost.
     
  11. texasmr2

    texasmr2 Two Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Oct 22, 2007
    22,232
    Houston
    Full Name:
    Gregg
    When was the plot lost?? I remember when F1 was about racing so on that note "Lord PLEASE take me now and put me out of my misery!!"
     
  12. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    Seems they've got it settled. In short;

    - The "Valencia" settings will be used for the remainder of the season - Blowing is allowed, but no map changes between qualy and race.
    - Everyone has agreed; no protests.
    - Next year the "problem" goes away with periscope style exhausts.

    Somewhat interestingly, is seems Ferrari & Sauber were the last to come onboard.

    Cheers,
    Ian
    http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/93075
     
  13. kraftwerk

    kraftwerk Two Time F1 World Champ

    May 12, 2007
    26,826
    England North West
    Full Name:
    Steve
    Ah well thanks for that Ian.

    Now we can get back to the SDC scheduled show: "How to win friends and influence people".
     
  14. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,693
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    #39 VIZSLA, Jul 14, 2011
    Last edited: Jul 14, 2011
    Given enough time, money and energy saner heads have prevailed.
    Too bad the whole farce needed to be played at all.

    BTW The latest issue of Motorsport has a fascinating piece on F1 financials. The numbers are staggering.
     
  15. 13MM

    13MM Rookie

    Jan 10, 2008
    33
    Yep, sounds exactly like US gov. Change rules so no one
    can make a decision where to put resources.
     
  16. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,693
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    Let's not be parochial. All governments are alike in that respect. ;)
     
  17. SDC

    SDC Formula Junior

    Oct 13, 2006
    454
    We all have much to learn from the FIA...

    http://en.espnf1.com/fia/motorsport/story/54269.html

    "Debates over the legality of teams' exhaust systems and engine maps hung over the British Grand Prix last weekend, with the governing body changing the regulations during and between practice sessions. The crux of the issue was the use of exhaust gases to influence the performance of the diffuser when the driver is not pressing the accelerator, which the FIA considers "arguably illegal". "

    -----

    So now... no one knows what is legal and what is illegal. In short... what you thought was legal is illegal but whatever was judged illegal is now considered legal. As long as Lew Senna Ham and Mclaren are happy and are able to remain competitive... legalities are all relative in the F1 land British nepotism.

    Yet Ferrari continues to win!!!!

    What a race and what an amazing drive by Alonso... Exactly the way to answer the Lew Senna Ham fan boys at the Silver stone British Grand Prix.
     
  18. kraftwerk

    kraftwerk Two Time F1 World Champ

    May 12, 2007
    26,826
    England North West
    Full Name:
    Steve
    Yes a great drive from Alonso, I'm very happy about that.

    Why do you think I would be upset about that.
     
  19. DF1

    DF1 Three Time F1 World Champ

    #44 DF1, Jul 15, 2011
    Last edited: Jul 15, 2011

Share This Page