What happens when a 767 lands just a little bit too hard.... | Page 4 | FerrariChat

What happens when a 767 lands just a little bit too hard....

Discussion in 'Aviation Chat' started by Juan-Manuel Fantango, Jun 21, 2012.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. cheesey

    cheesey Formula 3

    Jun 23, 2011
    1,921
    it depends on how much load capacity is in the existing structure as to how much needs to be modified to attach a pylon... Bob may have some insight what mods were made

    phunny... was walking by the TV this AM... one of the news channels was showing the same video of the landing that we have been talking about...
     
  2. jcurry

    jcurry Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jan 16, 2012
    24,153
    In the past
    Full Name:
    Jim
    And when the 747 first went into service there were no wide-body freighters other than military.
     
  3. Bob Parks

    Bob Parks F1 Veteran
    Consultant

    Nov 29, 2003
    8,018
    Shoreline,Washington
    Full Name:
    Robert Parks
    If I remember correctly, the spare engine hardware was an option for any 747. It didn't have to be a freighter. The 747 freighters came later with nose opening and carrying an engine or two was no sweat. The structural option to the wing was internal , the engines were bolted to pads underneath the wing . I'll dig through my stuff to try to find some pictures. I did a design study on loading engines on 767 freighters and it worked with 1.00" clearance using my engine buck design.
     
  4. Gatorrari

    Gatorrari F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Feb 27, 2004
    16,505
    Georgia
    Full Name:
    Jim Pernikoff
    I recall that Qantas' unique 707-138s were equipped to carry a fifth engine in the same manner - with bullet fairing - and I recall at least one photo showing one of their 707s doing just that. I don't believe that any other 707s were so equipped.
     
  5. Gatorrari

    Gatorrari F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Feb 27, 2004
    16,505
    Georgia
    Full Name:
    Jim Pernikoff
    And I also recall that when the first turbofans appeared in the early '60s, Delta referred to their fan-equipped DC-8s as "fifth-engine jets", implying that the fan-equipped aircraft had as much power as five conventional turbojets.
     
  6. Bob Parks

    Bob Parks F1 Veteran
    Consultant

    Nov 29, 2003
    8,018
    Shoreline,Washington
    Full Name:
    Robert Parks
    I stand corrected, James. The Russian stuff is all fuzzy to me anyway.
     
  7. BubblesQuah

    BubblesQuah F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Nov 1, 2003
    13,250
    Charlotte
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewbFlRaAd5c[/ame]

    Very interesting.
     
  8. Gatorrari

    Gatorrari F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Feb 27, 2004
    16,505
    Georgia
    Full Name:
    Jim Pernikoff
    #83 Gatorrari, Jun 26, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Here's the photo I was thinking of; unfortunately I haven't been able to find a bigger version.
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  9. Spasso

    Spasso F1 World Champ

    Feb 16, 2003
    14,656
    The fabulous PNW
    Full Name:
    Han Solo
    #84 Spasso, Jun 26, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Yes, Bear is TU-95 Turbo-prop
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  10. James_Woods

    James_Woods F1 World Champ

    May 17, 2006
    12,755
    Dallas, Tx.
    Full Name:
    James K. Woods
    I looked it up in a book I have on cold-war era planes - the reference said those big contra-props turned at only about 750 rpm when cruising. The turbines were over 15,000 h.p. each.

    So, you can see why all the flight film of them shows the props just barely seeming to turn.
     

Share This Page