Official 2013 car unveiling and conjecture thread | FerrariChat

Official 2013 car unveiling and conjecture thread

Discussion in 'F1' started by Ferraripilot, Dec 26, 2012.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Ferraripilot

    Ferraripilot F1 World Champ
    Owner Project Master

    May 10, 2006
    17,942
    Atlanta
    Full Name:
    John!
    With just a month or so to go with teams showing their 2013 contenders, I am -as always- very excited as these are the moments when keeping hope alive as well as curiousity get the better of many of us.

    I'm not expecting a massive difference from most everyone, but here's what I'm guessing:


    Will F2013 be a evolution of F2012? I don't think so. I expect a more traditional looking car with ramp and tunnel style exhausts a la Red Bull.

    Mp4-28 will be a clear evolution of Mp4-27.

    E21 will be a clear evolution of E20 but E21 will not be as competitive as E20, Lotus have simply lost a good number of key people to Bob Bell at Mercedes and their 'wooing' department.

    RB9 will have a more pronounced 'double floor tunnel' system at the sidepods, expect something very interesting back there.

    All bets are off and I have zero idea what MB are up to but I do know W04 is very different to W03. A wild card guess might be a pullrod front end and ramp exhaust with a radical tunnel double floor system designed by Newey's former right-hand man Geoff Willis. We'll see.
     
  2. sindo308qv

    sindo308qv F1 Rookie

    Nov 1, 2003
    3,575
    miami.fl.
    Full Name:
    sindo
    At the very least, they're somehow going to camouflage, or get rid of that stepped nose on the cars, is what I've heard.
     
  3. Ferraripilot

    Ferraripilot F1 World Champ
    Owner Project Master

    May 10, 2006
    17,942
    Atlanta
    Full Name:
    John!
    Right you are. If nothing else, the cars will look better.

    And from what we know of the 2013 Pirelli's via late season testing of their experimental compounds, they should be more consistent but it's also said the tires compress a bit more due to a new type of weave. Michelin anyone?
     
  4. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    Seems like I'm picking on you recently! ;) Nothing personal, but I'm not sure on this either - The regs are apparently going to allow a "vanity panel", but only as long as it doesn't affect aero. I very much doubt these guys are gonna install anything just to make 'em look pretty!

    What "late season tests"? They ran a few sets on Friday in, IIRC, Japan (Brazil?) but that's been it so far - Development tires on a nice green track isn't definitive IMO.

    I still can't get to Autosport, but there's a recent headline "Pirelli; Teams ready for aggressive tires." I believe Hembery is saying the teams want more degradation (again!) and he believes the new construction may shake things up some.

    I did read somewhere that they're gonna flex more and also be significantly heavier. Some are saying this will have a big effect on aero, but I remain unconvinced on that one - "Sticky out" wheels is the biggest aero disaster they have to deal with and I'm just not (yet) buying that a little flex is gonna mess everything up.

    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  5. Ferraripilot

    Ferraripilot F1 World Champ
    Owner Project Master

    May 10, 2006
    17,942
    Atlanta
    Full Name:
    John!
    Yeah you're exactly right, the few sets they ran I thought yielded a bit more compression due to the new weave which would lower the ride height just a bit. What this could do is help teams who had difficulty heating their tires in essentially providing a bit more aero. It could also overbake the tires for teams who have found what they believe to be the sweet spot. If there's a shake-up from tires, this will be what it's from IMO.
     
  6. DF1

    DF1 Three Time F1 World Champ

     
  7. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    Awesome, thanks for that. I get access back next year, but till then I'm screwed! ;)

    Interesting reading anyway - I like it that they have immense struggles on occasion. Sometimes "a" got it right, others, "b". It's always been a little that way though - Some cars like it hot, others cooler for example.

    However, looking back over the season they'd pretty much all got on top of 'em by the mid point and we were back at single stoppers - Which is not what "they" wanted. Note that the tires didn't change, the teams just figured 'em out.

    Also interesting that he put so much emphasis on wheel spin - Certainly not a good thing from the tires perspective (unless you can't get heat into 'em) but obviously only applicable to the rears - There were many occasions last year when the fronts died first however - Over driven? Over heated?

    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  8. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,693
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    Maybe wheel spin would be less of an issue if there were more grip.
     
  9. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    :eek: ;)

    I really hope to *never* see the day when they've got more grip than power! An F1 car that can't spin it's wheels at will is the day I lose interest......... Got close to that before they banned TC - Horrible, horrible, horrible IMO!

    As the late great Mark Donahue noted; "If you can leave two black stripes from the exit of one corner to the entry to the next, you've got enough HP"........ You may not have any tires left at the end of the lap, but that wasn't his point. ;)

    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  10. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,693
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    Agreed. But the balance need not be so extreme.

    I'm wondering why wheel spin is suddenly so destructive. It's not the spin (ie power) that's changed but the tires.
    If spin as opposed to slip is particularly harmful might it not relate to design and not compound?
     
  11. DF1

    DF1 Three Time F1 World Champ

    Ask anytime. I will happily post.
    Yes we saw graining and wear on the fronts quite often.
     
  12. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    Balance between what? Temperature & degradation? Wheelspin & longevity?

    Damn good question! TBH, reading his comments again I realize the guy's not a native English speaker and suspect he may have "overstated" the case a little. Is it "more destructive" than ever before? I certainly don't know the answer. :( ;)

    Sure - At least a little of both. They could do tires that will last forever and which could be spun up a like a top. Not what they want. As for slip - I dunno, but we rarely see F1 cars sliding around these days - A little tank slapper is as close as we get and I doubt that's ever hurt 'em too much.

    Right up until you too run out of views! I've said before, we need to share the load there. ;) Between us we should be OK. And as long as we include the link I think we should be good.

    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  13. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,693
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    Between grip and power.
     
  14. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    Ahh, OK.

    Helluva tough balance to find, I think. As we know, they generate huge amounts of grip and power output has, and will remain, about the same.

    You want to give them yet more grip? Or less grip? Either case, they'll tend to eat the tires even faster. For sure, there's no easy answers - Exactly as it should be of course. ;)

    His comments about them measuring tire temperatures all round the lap using IR thermometers in P1 & P2 did get me thinking and studying the rules again (uh-oh!) I don't see anything that precludes 'em building these sensors into the car permanently if it's so critical. In fact, I'd do 3 on each tire (inner, center, outer) and stream that data back in real time. Seems they already know the tire temps ["Kimi, keep the tires warm", "Yes, yes, yes!" ;)] but I believe that's coming from sensors inside the wheels and not externally.

    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  15. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,693
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    They seem to have found a working balance prior to last season.

    Why put sensors on permanently? They add weight (minimal as it may be), need to be integrated in a tight package, require power and may fail, taking other system(s) with them or give incorrect misleading data. In any case is there anything that the teams can do with the data during a race?

    Happy New Year all.
     
  16. mcimino

    mcimino Formula 3

    Oct 5, 2007
    2,276
    Long Island, NY
    #16 mcimino, Dec 27, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  17. Ferraripilot

    Ferraripilot F1 World Champ
    Owner Project Master

    May 10, 2006
    17,942
    Atlanta
    Full Name:
    John!
    #17 Ferraripilot, Dec 30, 2012
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2012
    Mercedes and Ferrari have both passed crashed tests.

    Mercedes have developed a new super tiny gearbox, even smaller sidepods which are rumored to in essence be a RB copy (/yawn, right), and the most interesting bit is the rear suspension supposedly has a great number of adjustment possibilities so the geometry can be altered practically on the fly. Lastly, it's probably sporting a Red Bull type exhaust ramp. Aldo Costa has been the head of this project! Geoff Willis is working 2014s W05.

    The Ferrari is statically (before adding ballast) supposedly 2kg heavier than F2012. This tells me it's a bit longer.


    And Sauber passed their tests as well, no tidbits re the car though.
     
  18. Ferraripilot

    Ferraripilot F1 World Champ
    Owner Project Master

    May 10, 2006
    17,942
    Atlanta
    Full Name:
    John!
    Mclaren and perhaps Ferrari (unconfirmed) were running a rear and front interconnected suspension but Mercedes were running rear. front, left, right, and diagonally connected. Massively complicated and it control warp and anti-roll but is heavily dependent on aero which Merc simply did not have. Look for a fully connected suspension on Mclaren 2013 or 2014.

    We know this of Mclaren as during a 2012 race LH issue was a broken antiroll bar, proving they are not using fully linked suspension.
     
  19. Ferraripilot

    Ferraripilot F1 World Champ
    Owner Project Master

    May 10, 2006
    17,942
    Atlanta
    Full Name:
    John!
  20. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,693
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    Oh my, real news.
    Thanks.
     
  21. Ferraripilot

    Ferraripilot F1 World Champ
    Owner Project Master

    May 10, 2006
    17,942
    Atlanta
    Full Name:
    John!
    I'd wager the big boys are far more interested in beating Reb Bull in 2014 than 2013. Ferrari, Mercedes, Renault will have it out in 2014. Can't wait
     
  22. DF1

    DF1 Three Time F1 World Champ

    Agree !! There is an element of looking past this year already in the press with teams saying how they are in fact focusing very much on the 'new' rules and cars/motors.
     
  23. Ferraripilot

    Ferraripilot F1 World Champ
    Owner Project Master

    May 10, 2006
    17,942
    Atlanta
    Full Name:
    John!
    Certain teams are already asking the FiA for further clarity regarding how the alloted fuel amount at certain rpms is measure. The FiA has already in essence stated it will be measured at the injector and by other means. I believe the idea of small fuel bladders is being throw around which will essentially store that off-throttle fuel to maintain the alloted pressure and then that additional fuel will be thrown at the intake via port injection or further into the direct injection system when back on throttle. Lots of ideas mulling about at the moment. This could potentially make for a very large boost in power but I cannot see how the FiA would ever deem such a thing legal as it appears to be in direct violation of the strict fuel measuring rules already in place.


    It's clear though that these manufacturers are after more fuel, because there is much more power to be made. I say give it to them, at least 10% more than they're allowing for at the moment.
     
  24. Ferraripilot

    Ferraripilot F1 World Champ
    Owner Project Master

    May 10, 2006
    17,942
    Atlanta
    Full Name:
    John!
    Lotus' aero department was apparently hit harder than I suspected. I knew Lotus' head aero guy Mike Elliot left for Mercedes and took a few people with him, but I hear it's more than just a casual couple or few people who left as apparently Elliot took a good number of his guys with him.

    That being said, I'm not expecting a huge amount from Lotus next year.
     
  25. DeSoto

    DeSoto F1 Veteran

    Nov 26, 2003
    7,870
    But they´ve raised the weight limit.
     

Share This Page