Concorde Documentary | Page 3 | FerrariChat

Concorde Documentary

Discussion in 'Aviation Chat' started by FERRARI-TECH, Feb 6, 2013.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. docmirror

    docmirror Formula Junior

    Joined:
    May 6, 2004
    Messages:
    781
    Location:
    Ft Worth TX
    The chart referenced is primarily for ATC to provide correct separation, and sequencing for many/any kind of plane, and for ground to determine correct taxi clearance distances. I'm guessing here that the TU-144 is listed just in case one would ever come to the US NAS and be sequenced for landing at some place busy like BWI. No one in their right mind would ever attempt operations out of Reagan national with a TU-144. lol,, Note, the Lockheed SR-71 is also in the chart, and it has operated out of several comm airports.
     
  2. dmaxx3500

    dmaxx3500 Formula 3

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2008
    Messages:
    1,027
    years ago i missed a chance to fly on a concorde,when it was at the EAA show in oshkosh,it went up lake mich to canada and back,i thought it cost $500+ ,and i couldn't afford it back then
     
  3. Lowell

    Lowell Formula 3 Owner

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2005
    Messages:
    1,165
    Location:
    Santa Fe, NM
    Full Name:
    Lowell Brown
    The SR71 (RS71) had a Pratt and Whitney JT11D-20 regular jet engine with, of course, the special spike to make the air velocity subsonic, and the afterburner.
    At high speed, the engine did work partially as a ram jet.
    The engine was originally developed for another plane, a jet-powered flying boat never produced.
     
  4. Bob Parks

    Bob Parks F1 Veteran Consultant

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2003
    Messages:
    8,018
    Location:
    Shoreline,Washington
    Full Name:
    Robert Parks
    Ain't no expert but I did get some info on the SST economics. My statement on the Concorde being unprofitable was right but wrong regarding the profitability of the airplane. As usual, the operation of the Concorde was a convoluted arrangement. BA and AF did not purchase the airframes but operated them, thus escaping the costs involved in all that goes with ownership. The passengers paid normal prices , 2000 dollars, initially but the operators were losing money so the price was upped a bit to 10,000 dollars for a crossing when the operators figured that those who were interested in flying Concorde didn't care how much it cost. Then they bundled the offering to a one way Supersonic crossing with a return on a subsonic vehicle and they did turn a profit. The operators were adjusting things to do better when the 9-11 thing and the accident combined to shut the SST down. So, I wasn't totally correct in my statement.
     
  5. FERRARI-TECH

    FERRARI-TECH Formula 3

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    Messages:
    1,677
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Full Name:
    Ferrari-tech
    You are right on Mr Parks.. my understanding is that BA paid the huge sum of one pound sterling for each concorde..so a total of about 20 bucks for the entire fleet...pretty good investment except for the British tax payer..
    A BA Concorde was on its way to NY for its first proving flight after the Paris accident, on the morning of 9-11, and we all know what that did to air transport, especially Concorde..
     
  6. James_Woods

    James_Woods F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    May 17, 2006
    Messages:
    12,755
    Location:
    Dallas, Tx.
    Full Name:
    James K. Woods
    Speaking of the "supersonic cruise" without afterburners - how about the B-58 and B-70 bombers?

    It was my understanding that the B-58 had to use afterburners, but the B-70 could supercruise without them...
     
  7. Str8shooter

    Str8shooter Formula 3

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,731
    Location:
    Orlando
    I saw this thread pop up and I thought I'd share a few pictures my Sister took when she and her husband took the Concorde
    on their way to the Grand Prix of Monaco. Unfortunately she isn't a photographer and had just got her first 35 mm camera
    just for that trip so the pictures are not spectacular but I think she still managed to capture the Concorde in one roll of film :)
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  8. WilyB

    WilyB F1 Rookie Rossa Subscribed

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2007
    Messages:
    4,284
    Location:
    AZ
    That made a lot of (business) sense back then. You would leave Paris at a decent time, 1100 and arrive downtown NYC mid-morning (landing at 0845).

    So you could have a full day of meeting and then fly back first-class on a 747, have a nice sleep and be back at the office the next morning.
     
  9. fiorano94

    fiorano94 F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    May 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,892
    Location:
    MW/NW/SE
    My grandfather took a shot of the in-cabin speedometer just as it hit mach 2 IIRC. I'll try and find it next time I have the ability to look through some old pictures.
     
  10. NürScud

    NürScud F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2012
    Messages:
    7,308
    Unfortunately links don't work. Only Tupolev's.
     
  11. Tcar

    Tcar F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2010
    Messages:
    4,739
    Location:
    Denver, Albuquerque
    B-70 yes to supercruise

    B-58, don't think so. Never heard that it could. A bomber that was obsolete from the beginning. A bear to fly... I think almost 1/4 of them were lost to accidents. Maintenance just on the weird nosegear was neverending. But damn, it could climb at something like 45,000 fpm.


    BTW, the famous supercruiser, the Concorde did not need afterburner to get to supercruise. They almost always used it, though as it was much quicker and used less fuel than punching through without the ABs.
     

Share This Page