Classification by Denis Jenkinson of what a car's condition is | FerrariChat

Classification by Denis Jenkinson of what a car's condition is

Discussion in 'Vintage (thru 365 GTC4)' started by swift53, Jan 13, 2014.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. swift53

    swift53 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed

    Nov 17, 2007
    8,024
    E.S.
    Full Name:
    Alberto
    Here is the complete text of what Denis Jenkinson wrote in his book, 'Directory of historic racing cars', about this very often discussed subject:

    I hope this will be of interest.

    "Jenks" was a wonderfully clever and brilliant exponent on automobilia, one of the best, if not the best there ever was.

    Regards, Alberto


    What follows, is kindly shared by a fellow Alfabb member 'Olaf'.

    Source: ‘Directory of historic racing cars’ written by Denis Jenkinson and published by Aston Publications Ltd. in 1987.

    "From the 'Glossary of terms' I Quote":


    ‘Original’:

    Almost impossible to find anything in this category. It would have had to have been put in store the moment it was completed. Possibly the Trossi-Monaco special in the Biscaretti Museum comes as close to an original racing car as it is possible to get.
    The ‘old-car industry’ frequently uses degrees of originality, such as ‘nearly original’, ‘almost original’, even ‘completely original’, but all such descriptions are meaningless as they cannot be quantified. A racing car that has only had a new set of tyres or a change of sparking plugs since it was completed is no longer ‘original’. Many components have remained ‘original’, such as gearboxes, cylinder heads, axles and so on, and reproduction parts are made to ‘original drawings’ and ‘original material specification’, but this does not make them ‘original’ parts, nor does a complete car built from such components qualify as ‘original’, regardless of what the constructor or owner might think. Such a car is nothing more than a ‘reproduction’ or ‘facsimile’.

    ‘Genuine’:

    This is a much more practical description for an old or historic car and can be applied to most racing cars that have had active and continuous lives, with no occasions when they ‘disappeared’ into ‘limbo’ or changed their character in any way. Most E.R.A.’s come into this category as they have been raced continuously, which meant the replacing of numerous components as they wore out, but the car itself has never been lost from view, nor has it’s basic character and purpose been altered over the years. Even such a well-known E.R.A. as ‘Romulus’ is not ‘original’, as it has been repainted, re-upholstered, new tyres have been fitted and new components have been used to rebuild the engine; it is unquestionably ‘Genuine’.

    ‘Authentic’:

    This term is used to describe a racing car that has led a chequered career, through no fault of its own , but has never disappeared from view. The ‘entity’, which is best described as the sum of the parts, has always been around in some form or other, but has now been put back to the specification that it was in, either when it was first built, or some subsequent known point in its history. An example would be an old Grand Prix car that was converted into a road-going sports car when its useful racing life was over, over the years having the racing engine replaced by a touring version, and eventually being allowed to deteriorate. It is then rescued and rebuilt as the Grand Prix car, with its racing engine replaced, but with new radiator, fuel tank and oil tank, new wheels made, new body-work, instrument panel , seat, upholstery and so on, all of which were missing. The ‘entity’ that started life as the Grand Prix car never actually disappeared, so the end result of all the labours can justifiably be described as ‘Authentic’. There is no question of it being ‘Original’, and to describe it as ‘Genuine’ would be unfair to its sister cars that remained Grand Prix cars all their lives, even though such things as radiator, fuel tank, seat and so on had to be replaced due to the ravages of time and use.
     
    ‘Resurrection’:

    Some racing cars, when they reached the end of their useful life, were abandoned and gradually dismantled as useful bits were taken off to use on other cars. Eventually insufficient of the car remained to form an acceptable entity, even though most of the components were still scattered about. There have been numerous cases were such components that still existed were gathered up to form the basis of a new car; a new chassis/frame and new body were required and, from the bare bones or the ashes of the original, another one appears. It cannot claim to be the original car, and certainly not a genuine car, nor an authentic car. At best it is a ‘Resurrection’ from the dead, or from the graveyard.

    ‘Re-construction’:

    This can stem from a single original component, or a collection of components from a variety of cars, but usually there is very little left of the original racing car, except its history and its character. From these small particles a complete new car is built , its only connection with the original car being a few components and the last-known pile of rust left over when decomposition set in.

    ‘Facsimile’:

    Purely and simply a racing car that now exists when there was never an original. If a factory built four examples of a particular Grand Prix model, for instance, and here are now five in existence, then the fifth can only be a facsimile, fake, clone, copy or reproduction. If the fifth car was built by the same people or factory who built the four original cars, then at best it could be a ‘Replica’ of the four genuine cars, but such a situation is unlikely. There are many reasons for building a facsimile , from sheer enthusiasm for a particular model to simple avarice, and it is remarkable how many facsimiles have been given a small piece of genuine history in order to try to authenticate the fake, and thus raise its value.
    Facsimiles have been built of just about everything from Austin to Wolseley, some being so well made that it is difficult to tell them from originals (genuine or authentic cars, Olaf). Some owners have been known to remain strangely silent about the origins of their cars when they have been mistaken for the real thing. Other facsimiles have been declared openly and honestly by the constructors such as the facsimile that has been built of an A/B-type E.R.A., or the series of facsimiles of 250F Maseratis that have been built. The trouble usually starts when the cars are sold to less scrupulous owners, who first convince themselves they have bought a genuine car, and then try to convince the rest of the sporting world. The disease is very prevalent in the world of museums, on the assumption that the paying public are gullible.

    ‘Duplication’:

    This is a disease which started many years ago within the ranks of the lovers of Bugatti cars. Unscrupulous people dismantled a Grand Prix Bugatti into its component parts and with the right hand sold an incomplete car as ‘a basket case’ and with the left hand sold another incomplete car as ‘a box of bits’.The two buyers eventually found suitable second-hand components to replace the missing parts, or had new bits made, and we ended up with two Grand Prix Bugattis where there had only been one. Naturally each owner claims ‘authenticity’ for his completed car. The Bugatti Owners Club – and the majority of its members – strongly disapprove of this practice.
    Unfortunately the disease has spread to many other makes, especially those that were built in large numbers. At best this whole business borders on fraud.
     
    ‘Special’:

    This name applies to one-off cars that are the product of the fertile brain of the constructor. It is probably true to say that no special has ever been finished! It may be sufficiently finished to allow it to race, but inevitably the constructor will be planning further modifications while he is racing it. If the special builder ever says his car is finished, it will usually indicate that it is now obsolete and he is starting a new one. The rebuilding or restoring of a special to use as an Historic racing car, by someone who is not the original constructor, can mean either that the car is rebuilt to a known point in time that appeals to the new owner, or he can continue the process of development where the originator left off. The nice thing about specials is that they are a law into themselves and do not need to be put into any sort or category. A special can be totally accepted as ‘Genuine, authentic, reconstructed or facsimile’.

    ‘Converted’:

    There have been examples of a Type A model being converted by the factory into a Type B and then into a Type C. The particular car as an entity never disappeared, though it might be difficult to recognize that the Type C was once a Type A. It is virtually impossible to re-convert such a car back to a Type A, no matter how desirable it may be. The perfect example is the E.R.A. that started life as R4B in 1936, was converted to R4C in 1937, and then into R4D in 1938 and was much modified again in 1948. The car still exists as R4D, with a well documented continuous history, and is as genuine as they come, but it can never revert back to R4B.

    ‘Destroyed’:

    A simple enough word that applies to a racing car that has been involved in an accident or fire in which no tangible components are left in recognizable shape or form.

    ‘Scrapped’:

    This usually applies to a car that is taken out of service by a factory team and either deliberately destroyed so that nothing is left, or useful components are removed and put into store and the rest is thrown on the scrap heap for crushing or melting down. There have been cases of a chassis frame being rescued from the scrap heap an used to re-create a new car. In no way can the new car be described as genuine. If the factory scrapped a car and removed its number from their records, then that car has gone forever, and the nebulous collection of old and new components can hardly justify the claiming of the scrapped number.

    ‘Broken up’:

    Similarly, if a factory records that a car has been broken up, it should mean exactly that. It has gone for good.
     
  2. Sempre_gilles

    Sempre_gilles Formula 3

    Jul 11, 2003
    1,822
    Full Name:
    AdK
    Love this part ;).
     
  3. gt4me

    gt4me F1 Veteran

    Sep 10, 2005
    5,666
    UK
    Full Name:
    Lewis Mitchell
    Great guy, still enjoy reading his articles in my old Motorsport's.
     
  4. Timmmmmmmmmmy

    Timmmmmmmmmmy F1 Rookie

    Apr 5, 2010
    2,808
    NZ
    Full Name:
    Timothy Russell
    He was pretty strict with his classifications but it did cut through all of the sales and explanation BS, for example pre 1988 every late spec. Maserati 250F claimed to be the one that Nuvolari drove to win the '57 German GP, but then of course it did..........
     
  5. open roads

    open roads F1 Rookie

    Jan 28, 2007
    3,799
    Sarasota, Fl.
    Full Name:
    Stan
    This is a nice excerpt from what I suspect is a good piece, and one which I will want in my collection.

    I openly find fault with one of the assertions. Actually, I find fault with something that, at best, I think he is trying to assert.

    When it comes to "authentic" , it appears as though he is saying the car "can" be authentic, if within view at all times.

    I believe there to be a subtle inference to the effect that, if not in view the entire time, then the car is not, or may not be thought of as "authentic".

    I find this, if it is meant to be the authors thoughts, to be a potentially hideously injustice to cars that would be found to be satisfying all of the other , good and reasonable criteria. All of which I believe I understand and agree with.



    Yes. I have a particular interest, yes I will share.

    Batteries about dead though. I'll be back.

    With an authentic car. Or at least one which I hope the world of public opinion recognizes as being exactly what it is. Recognizing that there will be supporters and detractors. At least that is what may be seen in some other situations.
     
  6. open roads

    open roads F1 Rookie

    Jan 28, 2007
    3,799
    Sarasota, Fl.
    Full Name:
    Stan
    In virtually every other aspect of this excerpt, I find favor. In this one though, which may be what the author is saying, I find fault.

    Is it accurately recorded here? Again, I do not yet have it as a reference.

    I think that most instances are covered here. But I would not be surprised if other circumstances than have been addressed here, may be shown to exist.






    Now to...

    Duck and cover quickly.
     
  7. Jack-the-lad

    Jack-the-lad Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    DSJ was a wise man....Also a guy who loved to drive, criss-crossing Europe covering races in his Porsche 356 and Lotus Elan and God knows what else.

    Of course, Yr. Obdt. Svt., HNM, III, (those of a certain age will know) had the racing correspondent's ultimate continental transport: 250GTO.
     
    tritone likes this.
  8. swift53

    swift53 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed

    Nov 17, 2007
    8,024
    E.S.
    Full Name:
    Alberto
    Buy the book, worth reading.

    Regards, Alberto
     
  9. Timmmmmmmmmmy

    Timmmmmmmmmmy F1 Rookie

    Apr 5, 2010
    2,808
    NZ
    Full Name:
    Timothy Russell
    It is a great book, although only if you are of a certain disposition. I can imagine some like myself would find it too Anglo - centric and I note that cars that werent either owned or used in the Uk were not covered as deeply as those that were. Hard not to agree that in trying to set boundaries you dont allow for the situations where things perhaps arent so easily classified.
     
  10. open roads

    open roads F1 Rookie

    Jan 28, 2007
    3,799
    Sarasota, Fl.
    Full Name:
    Stan
    Published in '87 means it is not old as the hills, but Jenks had that famous MM ride along/nav in '55 I think.

    Still, all in all, I think the reading will be to my liking. I like the way the English write, and the subject matter is bound to be of interest.
     
  11. bertdeboer340

    bertdeboer340 Formula 3

    Sep 16, 2003
    2,432
    Netherlands
    Full Name:
    Bert de Boer
    His report about the 1955 Mille Miglia with Sterling Moss is one of the best I ever read..
     
  12. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,692
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    Motorsport has been reprinting some of his pieces on F1 and contemporary impressions. The latest issue has his take on the then new Dino 246. Its a good read.
     
  13. Doug Nye

    Doug Nye Formula Junior
    Honorary

    Jan 21, 2008
    284
    UK
    Jenks was a wonderful friend and mentor to an entire generation of younger race reporters and racing writers, including Nigel Roebuck, Maurice Hamilton, Andy Marriott, myself and many more. He was an irritatingly constant critic while at the same time being a wonderfully encouraging exemplar. Most importantly he was an enthusiast first, a scribbler second. He had a remarkably enquiring mind, and with his enormous experience - first as 1949 World Champion motor-cycle racing sidecar passenger - then as winning navigator with Moss in the 1955 Mille Miglia - he was fully equipped to pass objectively fearless (if often controversial) judgement on racing events and topics.

    He wasn't always right. Just most of the time... He was prone to defending an opinion even when one could provide evidence that he hadn't even known about or ever considered. But he was wonderfully generous with his time and knowledge. Above all he enjoyed debate and argument. I vividly remember him walking up to a heated conversation between Ken Tyrrell and Keith Duckworth (of Cosworth) in the Silverstone paddock. Little Jenks stood there, looking up at both of them - from one to another - as they each made their point. Then during a pause in the argument, Ken looked down at him and said "Jenks - what do you think?". Whereupon DSJ weighed-in with a third-position argument he had plainly just dreamed up, just for the fun of it... Weeelllll - that passed an otherwise idle 15-20 minutes.

    His historic car rating system mentioned above was dreamed up partly in discussion and debate with me. In basics it has served us pretty well ever since. As for his book being Anglo-centric - give us a break.

    Jenks had spent his life within the British racing, historic, Vintage and Veteran scene. He was an English writer, working for an English publisher and addressing a majority British audience. He was, however, absolutely an internationalist. Although he worked on warplane development and testing during World War 2 he was essentially a conscientious objector. As far as he was concerned the war was an inconvenience sparked by bone-headed politicians, interrupting the only thing that really mattered - motor sport. He had no personal argument with the Germans, nor with any other nationality for that matter.

    In the later 1940s - without any money to support himself - he just packed his worldly goods on the back of his Norton motor-cycle and began a gipsy existence, racing from spring to Fall in Europe. Sparse travel, start and prize money from one weekend's race would see him through to the next race the following weekend, maybe hundreds of miles away. He based himself in Belgium for over a year when the British national health system was launched, so never became part of it. Upon his return to England it seemed that apart from his passport there was no official record he even existed. He kept the bureaucrats in the dark for as many years as he could. He lived alone in a remote cottage with no mains electricity, the water supply via a mile and a half of hosepipe laid across fields from the nearest farm. With various girlfriends - one lasting 17 bohemian years - he was happy as the proverbial...

    Our photographer pal Geoffrey Goddard and myself became his executors. I still preserve his diaries, files, records, his World Sidecar Champion scroll, Mille Miglia trophies and the famous roller map he used that May Day. In the minds of all who knew him, the little garden gnome is with us still...unforgettable.

    DCN
     
    Schultz, swift53, Ribolla_67 and 10 others like this.
  14. Marcel Massini

    Marcel Massini Two Time F1 World Champ
    Honorary

    Mar 2, 2005
    24,748
    FA.BU.LO.US.
    Thank you Doug.

    Marcel Massini
     
    BMWairhead likes this.
  15. DWR46

    DWR46 Formula 3
    Honorary

    Jun 19, 2012
    2,026
    Doug: Very nice tribute about a fascinating man. There are still a few that dance to the beat of their own drummer.
     
  16. Timmmmmmmmmmy

    Timmmmmmmmmmy F1 Rookie

    Apr 5, 2010
    2,808
    NZ
    Full Name:
    Timothy Russell
    Wonderful tribute. I still regularly thumb through my copy of his iconic Directory of historic racing cars.
     
    BMWairhead likes this.
  17. Jack-the-lad

    Jack-the-lad Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    #17 Jack-the-lad, May 21, 2023
    Last edited: May 21, 2023
    I’ve read most of DSJ’s books and still have his first, The Racing Driver. A Passion for Porsches, which I believe was published posthumously, is probably my favorite. There have been other race reporting greats….Manney, Lyons, etc…but Jenks was truly unique.
     
    Timmmmmmmmmmy likes this.
  18. Nembo1777

    Nembo1777 F1 World Champ

    Nov 4, 2006
    11,318
    opposite lock
    Full Name:
    Marc Sonnery
    Great tribute Doug and garden gnome....Hahahah!

    Quick anecdote not with but about Jenkinson: Mille Miglia 1999 before the evening start I was walking up the line of cars queuing to start one by one. Traditionally they do this engines off so as not overheat, pushing the cars along.

    But suddenly in the line of more anonymous cars I see a certain open Mercedes with number 722, yes THAT car and THAT bald man at the wheel...with only his wife Susie Moss -who just left us alas- pushing...alone!
    I thought that was not right so I went to help her push it along...since she was very friendly and chatty we joked and then I suggested she might consider wearing a long Jenks style beard to complete the illusion...and she answered: "Oh yes! and imitate his little mannerisms!"
     
  19. Jack-the-lad

    Jack-the-lad Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Susie with a Jenks beard….that’s funny!
     
    Nembo1777 likes this.
  20. Nembo1777

    Nembo1777 F1 World Champ

    Nov 4, 2006
    11,318
    opposite lock
    Full Name:
    Marc Sonnery
    Well I knew not all ladies would appreciate such a joke but I sensed that she would...and she did:)
     
    Jack-the-lad likes this.
  21. swift53

    swift53 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed

    Nov 17, 2007
    8,024
    E.S.
    Full Name:
    Alberto
    I have been reading Jenks for as long as I remember, and always loved his outspoken,
    "what I think I say, and who cares if you agree". Peculiar, call him what you will, a caveman. A free spirit.

    He is the kind of writer I like. Too much of a knowledgeable type, to be questioned.
    Perfect, no such thing, but extremely 'his way, with pride, humour, and honour'.

    Regards, Alberto
     
    Timmmmmmmmmmy likes this.

Share This Page