Oh no .. not another Lion Air incident | FerrariChat

Oh no .. not another Lion Air incident

Discussion in 'Aviation Chat' started by BlueBiturbo, Feb 3, 2014.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. BlueBiturbo

    BlueBiturbo F1 Rookie

    May 19, 2004
    3,967
    Jakarta
    Full Name:
    TS
    #1 BlueBiturbo, Feb 3, 2014
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2014
    First to crash a 737-800 (in Bali)
    http://www.ferrarichat.com/forum/aviatorchat-com/405126-another-lion-air-accident.html
    Now, First to trash a 737-900ER


    4G landing, bounced 3x, tailstrike. Structural damage. Good for my buddy's junkyard business

    Accident: Lion B739 at Surabaya on Feb 1st 2014, hard landing
    http://images.detik.com/customthumb/2014/02/03/10/101034_aviationsafety.jpg?w=460

    Lion Air Hard Landing with a Tail Strike - PPRuNe Forums


    Lion has to be nominated for Guiness Book of Records for being the first airline to trash two new types of airplane.
    Will they trash new A320 when they got it delivered?
     
  2. LouB747

    LouB747 Formula 3

    Apr 8, 2009
    2,123
    Huntington Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Lou Boyer
    4G. It makes me wonder what the G load would be if you just didn't flare at all? 800 fpm at say 150 kts. Any takers on this math problem?
     
  3. tazandjan

    tazandjan Three Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Jul 19, 2008
    38,056
    Clarksville, Tennessee
    Full Name:
    Terry H Phillips
    Lou- Too hard to calculate when you add in ground effect and strut compression, but 800'/min= 13.3 fps with no slowing and the max descent rate on landing for the F-35C is 26.4 fps, about twice that. Navy test pilots have said they really have a hard time getting that high an impact speed because it is so violent it usually takes them two or three tries to land that hard.

    Sounds like for a 4 g impact, descent rate would exceed your 800 fpm by quite a bit.
     
  4. LouB747

    LouB747 Formula 3

    Apr 8, 2009
    2,123
    Huntington Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Lou Boyer
    Yeah, I figured it must've been quite a bit more than that. Just used half the airspeed rule (actually ground speed) to figure the required VS required to follow the glideslope. So say around 160 kts = 800fpm for approach. Then no flare at that rate. I'm curious what that would give.

    He obviously hit a lot harder than that.
     
  5. Dubya

    Dubya Karting

    Jun 30, 2013
    114
    Sydney, Australia
    But it makes you realise how tough Boeing aircraft are. I feel more comfortable sitting in a 737 inside a thunderstorm, than sitting in a boat on Sydney Harbour!
     
  6. Bob Parks

    Bob Parks F1 Veteran
    Consultant

    Nov 29, 2003
    7,912
    Shoreline,Washington
    Full Name:
    Robert Parks
    When I was working at Boeing some of the stuff was designed to as much as 14G. A great amount of skill and experience goes into designing the wings for gust loads as well as static loads and they never skimp on it either. Most difficult is to build a wing where you are getting loads going in opposite directions in turbulence
     
  7. tazandjan

    tazandjan Three Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Jul 19, 2008
    38,056
    Clarksville, Tennessee
    Full Name:
    Terry H Phillips
    Lou- If we know how far the struts compress, we can calculate that.
     
  8. Kieran

    Kieran F1 Rookie

    Jul 23, 2006
    4,202
    Westchester, NY
    Full Name:
    Kieran
    Didn't Lion Air receive a ban from European airspace?
     
  9. Zack

    Zack Formula 3

    Dec 18, 2003
    2,001
    Nicosia, Cyprus/Cali
    Full Name:
    Zacharias
    You would need the rate of compression too. It's not linear.
     
  10. tazandjan

    tazandjan Three Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Jul 19, 2008
    38,056
    Clarksville, Tennessee
    Full Name:
    Terry H Phillips
    Zack- It would be pretty close to instantaneous at that rate of descent.
     
  11. James_Woods

    James_Woods F1 World Champ

    May 17, 2006
    12,755
    Dallas, Tx.
    Full Name:
    James K. Woods
    It occurs to me that the discussion here should be more about why in the hell this guy DID IT than whether or not the transport jet could take it and survive.

    It is starting to look like this airline should be closed down, at least until they can decide to learn how to fly safely.
     
  12. BlueBiturbo

    BlueBiturbo F1 Rookie

    May 19, 2004
    3,967
    Jakarta
    Full Name:
    TS
    #12 BlueBiturbo, Feb 5, 2014
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2014
    Too big to fail.
    Plus the safety authorities down here is too lenient, if You know what I mean.

    I suppose the plane was landing on tailwind

    Good quotes here :
    "How long does the average airplane last at Lionair?"
    "They last as long as some of my relationships with young dumb busty blondes"
     
  13. Zack

    Zack Formula 3

    Dec 18, 2003
    2,001
    Nicosia, Cyprus/Cali
    Full Name:
    Zacharias
    #13 Zack, Feb 5, 2014
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2014
    800 fpm is 13 fps.
    Struts on passenger aircraft are pretty big, assuming the travel is 6.5 feet, it would take half a sec to compress fully.
    From s= ut+1/2(a)t^2, and u = 0:
    a = 2s/t^2
    = 13/0.25
    = 52 fps^2

    From F=ma, assuming mass and knowing a, we can calculate F. Divide by g to get multiples of g's. So, who can finish this to get a rough idea of the g loading?
     
  14. tazandjan

    tazandjan Three Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Jul 19, 2008
    38,056
    Clarksville, Tennessee
    Full Name:
    Terry H Phillips
    Zack- That is a little less than 2 gs.
     
  15. BlueBiturbo

    BlueBiturbo F1 Rookie

    May 19, 2004
    3,967
    Jakarta
    Full Name:
    TS
    Rumored more that $10 million repair for structural damage
     

Share This Page